|
| 27 Dec 2011 10:53 PM |
For instance, I'm talking to the wife of a guy who was in a hit-and-run, and I ask her how her husband was hit by a car. She says, "He was mad and happened to walk in front of a car." Well, I knew that the guy was intoxicated, so that's not really "happened to walk" so I say that she's lying.
"That's a lie! You know who pushed him in front of the car! Tell me!"
WOAH COLE. I don't have any evidence for that. My investigation is ruined. Have to do it again. Crap. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
hambert
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Jul 2008 |
| Total Posts: 10067 |
|
| |
|
| 27 Dec 2011 10:59 PM |
| no, when something like that happens, you go with the doubt option |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|