|
| 24 Apr 2011 03:07 PM |
Ok, as many of you know I created two HGD games. The first still works fine but is a little out of date. The second however has run into problems. Its has major lag caused by a combo of decals and bricks. Now what I am wanting to know is what do you want to do? I have a few options laid out that could work. - 1. Keep on trying to fix the New Halo Galatic Domination - 2. Forget about the NHGD and update the Origional with units and planets. - 3. Start over compleatly with a new map and add all the units and planets. - 4. Your own idea - Now please respond with any of these as your vote. Just type 1, 2, or 3, if you want any of those as your vote. If you have a idea type 4 and state your idea. I will take a look periodicly to see what every one has voted. Only vote once, and I will make my dicision on a unknown date in the future. Thank you for caring enough about HGD to vote in a attempt to make it better. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
addey
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 332 |
|
|
| 24 Apr 2011 04:17 PM |
i vote: 4 you should stick with the original, but make 2 or 3 less planets, and that might clear up the lag a little, because the first one lags quite badly too. also, add something new that would get more people playing! most of the time, nobody is playing it! i think HGD is a brilliant game and a one of a kind, as there are no other games like it! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
helo119
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jun 2009 |
| Total Posts: 296 |
|
|
| 24 Apr 2011 08:55 PM |
I would vote 4: (My idea is an upgraded version of 2. So if you think this vote actually belongs to 2, go ahead and change it.) Copy the original onto the NHGD Place, then update on THAT place, Just in Case something happens. So you could maybe keep the Original 1 update behind so people aren't stuck with a ruined place. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Apr 2011 01:45 AM |
| i cant make an good decision cause 1 and 2 are both good plans so i decided to vote for 2 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Apr 2011 01:46 AM |
| if you update the original will my planet desing be there? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 25 Apr 2011 03:18 AM |
| i choose 1 cause 2 get rid of the lag go into the freemodel place but go 2 ur models when u have the anti lag scipt then press it like a million times so then when some1 goes on they,ll have no lag stirght away bu t with 1 u,ll have lag at 1st then u,ll lag up badly later so thats y i say like a million(i dont mean a million i mean alot of times) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Apr 2011 06:17 PM |
| Anit lag scripts are not true they give your place a virus theres not way to have anit lag unless you have a good computer. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
piecheese
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Jun 2008 |
| Total Posts: 950 |
|
|
| 25 Apr 2011 07:48 PM |
| 3., the old one is outdated, and the new halo galactic domination has multiple large problems. suggest u copy all of the races homeworlds and other major planets. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
clanky4
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 389 |
|
|
| 26 Apr 2011 07:03 AM |
4. I would suggest that you strip the game down to it's bare essentials.
What I mean is get rid of the units that are rarely ever used. (I never see anyone use all of the available units) Scale down the amount of planets, people don't use all of them. And I have noticed that the building brick set you have in the starting area is a tad bit too big. It never completely loads on my computer.
Your game is a very good design and fun to play but it just has a tad bit too much in it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
addey
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 332 |
|
|
| 26 Apr 2011 11:42 AM |
| you dont need to do as much as above says |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
JJBAM65
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3 |
|
|
| 26 Apr 2011 02:43 PM |
| i think that you should scrap the new hgd and update the old one with units BUT dont add many if any planets |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
JJBAM65
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3 |
|
| |
|
helo119
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jun 2009 |
| Total Posts: 296 |
|
|
| 26 Apr 2011 07:16 PM |
| @clank: It seems like a good idea. But the fun of having lesser used units is using them. I like using the rarer units (such as Rhinos as the UNSC, Bombers as the Flood, or Skirmishers as the Covies...) So it would kinda ruin the fun in it. As for the other part, as toning down the bricks (without decals). I noticed in the old one, its just the same brickset TWICE. So yes...tone down on the bricks... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Apr 2011 10:08 PM |
In my opinion all of the Units are needed. So no matter what I do with the game all of the units will stay in the game. Same with the planets(I worked realy hard on those). Otherwise you all hive some very good points. Please keep voting and sujesting new ideas.
Thank You Legobuilder95 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Adaris2
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1 |
|
|
| 27 Apr 2011 03:25 PM |
| I love both games, though I go to the original one more because of the new one's lag. I have to say #2. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
helo119
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jun 2009 |
| Total Posts: 296 |
|
|
| 27 Apr 2011 05:06 PM |
(An update to my vote.) Insted of inserting a bunch of new planets, just...insert a few... I mean like you said, the lag was cased by a mix of decals and bricks. So whats gona happen if you have the same number of decals and bricks? LAG. I mean you can insert more planets, yeah. But I am also suggestion a tone down... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
addey
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 332 |
|
|
| 28 Apr 2011 11:40 AM |
| legobuilder, out of interest, what would you vote for? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Apr 2011 06:36 PM |
different version of 2 so like 4, 3, and 2 i mean this by using a new map where planets r easier to find and scrap some units and add some new ones in the nghd |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Apr 2011 01:40 AM |
i vote 4 i have a very very good idea for you now ul haved to read this hole thing KEEP the old dom BUTTTT chang a few things like the planets are to small increase there size by x3 or more and the amount of planets is sort of anoying altho good for big games it made it sorta hard to find enyone next GIT RID OF FLOOD if u still have them idrk havent been on it in a long time but most people use flood like there a invinsible race also idk if ur guna use my idea or not but im buildings a halo map where i got a base plate and streatched it as far as i could and im buildings a MASIVE ark altho sins i wunted to build in a herry the first arm i made has a bit less grafics to it but im fixsing that right now and also u do have alot of units indeed but u need to make them realisticly sized some of the vehicals are the size of the infuntry you should have inside planet units and space units |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Apr 2011 04:42 PM |
| I personaly agree with clanky4 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Apr 2011 07:41 PM |
| 2....But don't add anymore planets. 1 reason I have for not putting in anymore planets is cuz we don't need stars and gas giants. You actually need to take out the huge redish pinkish, giant, planet. Also, the halo ring is pretty much NEVER used, so please take it out. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 May 2011 07:13 PM |
| 2 the original is better but there isnt a whole lot of room on the planets |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 May 2011 05:15 AM |
| i say option 2 as the orginal is played the most but maybe 1-3 planets could be added |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|