Artia44
|
  |
| Joined: 15 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 24951 |
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 02:59 PM |
Vaktovia stole their colors.
That is also why the war was so long. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Tenal
|
  |
| Joined: 15 May 2011 |
| Total Posts: 18684 |
|
| |
|
Armanos
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 14602 |
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 03:01 PM |
>>>>>:O OHGM your right.
l~ArM~l |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
squidboi2
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Apr 2009 |
| Total Posts: 52336 |
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 03:02 PM |
| But black and white aren't colors. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Tenal
|
  |
| Joined: 15 May 2011 |
| Total Posts: 18684 |
|
| |
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 03:07 PM |
Black isnt a color.
A black object absorbs all the colors of the visible spectrum and reflects none of them to the eyes.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Dekord
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Sep 2008 |
| Total Posts: 9965 |
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 03:08 PM |
@solo
And an object of green/red/purple/whatever you want, do so partially. Doesn't mean black is not a color. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 03:08 PM |
White is all the colors together, and black is a shade.
~->Implying that this is my siggy<-~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
olldeath
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Jul 2009 |
| Total Posts: 15578 |
|
| |
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 03:12 PM |
@ Dekord.
They reflect color while black does not.
Black is not a color. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Dekord
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Sep 2008 |
| Total Posts: 9965 |
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 03:14 PM |
@solo
They reflect light*, yes. But I can just as easily say that absorbing light is the definition instead, no?
It's a color. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Solotaire
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Jul 2009 |
| Total Posts: 30356 |
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 03:15 PM |
"But black and white aren't colors." To clarify: On the light scale, black is not considered a colour (for reasons soloman has already explained), and white is the combination of all the colours on the visible light scale.
However, when you use the pigment scale of colour, white is no longer a colour and black is all the colours.
A better phrase would be "Black /or/ white isn't a colour", as depending on which scale you use, one of them always will be a colour. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
squidboi2
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Apr 2009 |
| Total Posts: 52336 |
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 03:17 PM |
@Dekord,
Sorry, but you can't make up definitions for words on the spot.
SOWEE. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Dekord
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Sep 2008 |
| Total Posts: 9965 |
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 03:22 PM |
@Squid
I wasn't making up a definition, I was hypothetically changing it for you to see the argument from a different perspective.
If there is an accepted standard I am unaware of..? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 03:23 PM |
@ Darth.
Flame moar.
And no.
If I meant white I would have said white.
White reflects all colors.
Black reflects none.
White == color
Black =/= color |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
squidboi2
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Apr 2009 |
| Total Posts: 52336 |
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 03:24 PM |
"But I can just as easily say that absorbing light is the definition instead, no?"
"say that absorbing light is the definition instead, no?"
"say...definition instead"
Ya.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Dekord
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Sep 2008 |
| Total Posts: 9965 |
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 03:24 PM |
| And again: Why is reflecting light the definition for colour, rather than absorbing it? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Solotaire
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Jul 2009 |
| Total Posts: 30356 |
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 03:24 PM |
Dekord's definition is valid. As I explained, in the case of Dekord's version, White is no longer a colour. It is just based off of absorbing or emitting. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Dekord
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Sep 2008 |
| Total Posts: 9965 |
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 03:25 PM |
@Squid
lol
Yes, keyword being "if" here. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|