|
| 01 Oct 2011 09:39 PM |
I would tottaly move there.
There is one major city of Greenland called "Nuuk aka Godthab". Nuuk, Greenland is the capital of Greenland. It has a population of 50,000 people. The majority of the people speak english Danish and Inuit. Around 80% of the people in Greenland are of Inuit decent, while 20% of the people Are Danish.
If Greenland becomes an independent country then people from all over the world would start a new life there.
Greenland is the place to be! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
cowkiller
|
  |
| Joined: 03 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 4193 |
|
|
| 01 Oct 2011 09:49 PM |
| Yeah Lets move into a freezer! So much to do so much to see >.< I also have disliking for the danish :P |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Twigs180
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Mar 2008 |
| Total Posts: 18664 |
|
|
| 01 Oct 2011 09:54 PM |
| why? Greenland should remain a colony. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
cowkiller
|
  |
| Joined: 03 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 4193 |
|
|
| 01 Oct 2011 09:57 PM |
| Could it really sustain itself without denmark? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Oct 2011 10:01 PM |
>I also have a disliking for the Danish.
What is there to dislike? ---------------------------- Do you think Greenland would fail if it became an independent country?
Here is what I think:
If the climate in Greenland ever gets warmer and the population increases; then there would be more jobs more natural resources and more revenue. TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK!
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Oct 2011 10:02 PM |
@cow killer
It could, if the population increases and the climate gets warmer. -:) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
History0
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1679 |
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 05:43 AM |
"Could it really sustain itself without denmark?"
Well, the Falklands are economically self-sustainable (and they haven't started extracting oil), they need the UK for defence and political representation, Greenland doesn't have any big threat and I suppose that they can solve the last problem. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 08:36 AM |
It needs to be independent, it would be amazing if natives ruled there own country for once.
~ᎠᎩᎦᎤᎾᎤᎢᎤᎾᎳᏅᎯ~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Twigs180
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Mar 2008 |
| Total Posts: 18664 |
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 09:02 AM |
Lizard...just no.
There is a reason the Indians died. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 10:13 AM |
@lizard
It does not "need" to be independent. It would just be nice if it was independent. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
wreton34
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2698 |
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 10:14 AM |
| I think it should only be independent when it has a larger population. Or should be ceded to the UK. I prefer the latter. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 10:15 AM |
Lizard...just no.
There is a reason the Indians died. __________________________________________________________________________ Because in the end they were massacred by the oppressive whites? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Warrab
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Oct 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2390 |
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 10:36 AM |
Many were killed by whites, that's undeniable and unforgivable.
But 95% of natives were actually killed by European diseases, and that wasn't intentional. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 10:37 AM |
| Oh well. The gold rush was what killed the Native Americans. Once again, greed has won the battle against humanity. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Twigs180
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Mar 2008 |
| Total Posts: 18664 |
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 11:19 AM |
How did the gold rush kill the Indians? The largest of Indian deaths occurred about 10 years before that and 30 years after.
The Natives died because they weren't smart enough to invent guns. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 11:25 AM |
I agree with Twigs!
If you are too stupid to unite instead of fight you selves, you deserved to die. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 11:47 AM |
| No one deserves to die because they weren't trying to find ways to kill each other. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 11:57 AM |
| No one deserves to die, you cold selfish pig. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
wreton34
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2698 |
|
| |
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 12:00 PM |
| What about the n@zi leaders, responsible for the killing of large numbers of Jews? What about the inhuman extremists who order the sui.cide bombings of hundreds? These people represent their nations. And they do it by spreading horror and terror. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Warrab
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Oct 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2390 |
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 12:00 PM |
| I can name at least two people that deserved to die this year. One died a few days ago, one died a few months ago. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Czechia
|
  |
| Joined: 10 May 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1860 |
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 12:30 PM |
The Natives died because they weren't smart enough to invent guns.
___
And what's the deal?
Natives lived in natural conditions. The reason natives died wasn't because they weren't able to invent guns, they died mostly of disease, slavery, Spaniards and Al-capohol. And tell me, if you would meet a civilisation 2000 years ahead, that would try to kill your civilisation, would you be able to invent technology concurentive to theirs? I don't think so. And that's how the natives had problems with that, and there haven't been much of whites jumping on native side, and that was mostly to sell guns, not to show them how to make them. Your argument is stupid. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ewtron
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Oct 2008 |
| Total Posts: 3132 |
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 01:56 PM |
| Yeah, it's still part of Denmark, isn't it? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
logmanjr
|
  |
| Joined: 13 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 10075 |
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 02:02 PM |
| Why denmark retains it is questionable. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ewtron
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Oct 2008 |
| Total Posts: 3132 |
|
|
| 02 Oct 2011 02:04 PM |
| Then again, doesn't Britain control the Falkland Islands down in South America? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|