| |
|
| |
|
dew365
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Sep 2008 |
| Total Posts: 7712 |
|
| |
|
iornfence
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 7305 |
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:03 PM |
| they got a picture. and gravity. gravity tells all. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:03 PM |
| astromoners know its there u numnut |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:03 PM |
| Well, the moon landing is real, there's evidence to prove it, but Pluto? None at all, really. A satellite has never even seen the thing. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Benbo231
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 1362 |
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:03 PM |
| Telescopes have pictures. You've never seen Zimbabwe, have you? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:04 PM |
| The only "picture" is a blurry speck. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:04 PM |
| Moon landing is fake. Why is the flag waving when there's no gravity up there. Why is there a picture of the spaceship from the outside taking off...YOU TOOK THE PICTURE? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Benbo231
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 1362 |
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:04 PM |
| And we do have a satellite that's done a fly-by of pluto. It took pictures on its way out of the solar system forever. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:05 PM |
| ***WHO TOOK THE PICTURE*** |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:05 PM |
| There's no actual picture of Pluto, nothing to prove it exists. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
iornfence
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 7305 |
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:05 PM |
| they left a camera. as for the flag waving, its held by wires. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Benbo231
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 1362 |
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:05 PM |
| Unwanted...It's inertia from the initial planting of the flag, camera footage from a vid-cam on the landing gear that was retrieved later on by another mission? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:06 PM |
@Ben
You mean Voyager 2?
It never came close to Pluto. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Benbo231
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Nov 2008 |
| Total Posts: 1362 |
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:07 PM |
| I don't have pictures of any one of you. Nor do you have any pics of me. Therefore, you're all hoaxes and don't exist. Any one of you figments of my imagination wanna argue further? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:07 PM |
Pluto, formal designation 134340 Pluto, is the second-most-massive known dwarf planet in the Solar System (after Eris) and the tenth-most-massive body observed directly orbiting the Sun. Originally classified as the ninth planet from the Sun, Pluto was recategorized as a dwarf planet and plutoid due to the discovery that it is one of several large bodies within the newly charted Kuiper belt.[note 9] Like other members of the Kuiper belt, Pluto is composed primarily of rock and ice and is relatively small: approximately a fifth the mass of the Earth's Moon and a third its volume. It has an eccentric and highly inclined orbit that takes it from 30 to 49 AU (4.4–7.4 billion km) from the Sun. This causes Pluto to periodically come closer to the Sun than Neptune. As of 2011, it is 32.1 AU from the Sun.[12] From its discovery in 1930 until 2006, Pluto was classified as a planet. In the late 1970s, following the discovery of minor planet 2060 Chiron in the outer Solar System and the recognition of Pluto's relatively low mass, its status as a major planet began to be questioned.[13] In the late 20th and early 21st century, many objects similar to Pluto were discovered in the outer Solar System, notably the scattered disc object Eris in 2005, which is 27% more massive than Pluto.[14] On August 24, 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) defined what it means to be a "planet" within the Solar System. This definition excluded Pluto as a planet and added it as a member of the new category "dwarf planet" along with Eris and Ceres.[15] After the reclassification, Pluto was added to the list of minor planets and given the number 134340.[16][17] A number of scientists continue to hold that Pluto should be classified as a planet.[18] Pluto has four known moons, the largest being Charon discovered in 1978, along with Nix and Hydra, discovered in 2005,[19] and the provisionally named S/2011 P 1, discovered in 2011.[20] Pluto and Charon are sometimes described as a binary system because the barycenter of their orbits does not lie within either body.[21] The IAU has yet to formalise a definition for binary dwarf planets, and as such officially classifies Charon as a moon of Pluto.[22] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
wowufail
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 138 |
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:07 PM |
lol the moon has very weak gravity hurr durrr all large thns .ike palnets and moons have a little garvity |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
iornfence
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 7305 |
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:08 PM |
| Wait. I know who posted this. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:09 PM |
| i guess evolution is fake if they dont have pictures |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:09 PM |
I have a *very* basic knowledge about all things gravity, but one thing I can't quite get my head around is the 'weakness' of gravity on the moon. Surely it is a large enough body (and is also within proximity to another large body, the Earth)? The more I try and fathom this out the more my head hurts - helpful, easy to understand answers greatly appreciated!
To above |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
xpsm1530
|
  |
| Joined: 01 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 22280 |
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 09:10 PM |
| No, scientist s just classify it as a meteorite, not a planet. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|