|
| 25 Sep 2011 09:47 PM |
Ohye.
al dat OOP crapz suckz. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Tenal
|
  |
| Joined: 15 May 2011 |
| Total Posts: 18684 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
thegenius
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Oct 2008 |
| Total Posts: 3838 |
|
|
| 25 Sep 2011 09:53 PM |
Agreed.
(Note: Math FTW) (Also, thegenius is insane.) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Sep 2011 10:00 PM |
| there are so many noob C++ programmers out there who dont know diddly squat about C++, but only experienced programmers claim to know C |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Sep 2011 10:02 PM |
| That statement is false. C = C++ because the incremental operator comes afterwards, meaning it does the comparison and then increments. If the incremental operator was first it would be even further false, because it would cause C to be less since the incrementation happens before the comparison. umadbro? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Sep 2011 10:03 PM |
| Poke won the game due to using his brain and thinking about the "++" increment. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Sep 2011 10:04 PM |
nou.
fortunately, the comparison was beging performed in a multicore environment, so when the CPU loaded C, it got a number, let's say 50. then a second thread edited C to be 25 before the first thread leaded C again, thus it becomes 50 > 25++, which is true. umadbro? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Sep 2011 10:06 PM |
| No, because that means you didn't add thread safety, like any good C++ programmer would. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Sep 2011 10:09 PM |
| that's because a C programmer wrote it, not a C++ noob |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
thegenius
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Oct 2008 |
| Total Posts: 3838 |
|
|
| 25 Sep 2011 10:10 PM |
Contradiction.
(Note: Math FTW) (Also, thegenius is insane.) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
XlegoX
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jun 2008 |
| Total Posts: 14955 |
|
|
| 25 Sep 2011 11:11 PM |
| Most large complex C code bases just just as much object orientation as C++ projects do. I don't see the point of not moving to C++ for them, other than lack of compiler support which isn't an issue for most projects. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Sep 2011 11:49 PM |
| Because C forces you to create your own OOP system specific for the purpose of the project |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 26 Sep 2011 12:26 AM |
| Object Oriented Programmation is one of the features of C++ that I like the most. If you say that it is bad, then I am forced to disagree with you. Anyways, nobody forces you to use OOP, if you don't like it (which is surprising). |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Seireihen
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 120 |
|
|
| 26 Sep 2011 02:34 AM |
im 12 and wat is this
~God Troll strikes again~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
XlegoX
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jun 2008 |
| Total Posts: 14955 |
|
|
| 26 Sep 2011 08:01 AM |
"Because C forces you to create your own OOP system specific for the purpose of the project"
That's in correct. Object oriented code written in C is less efficient than code written in C++, because there's a lot of optimization which C++ compilers can perform that the C compilers aren't sophisticated enough to perform on the equivalent C code. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Sep 2011 11:19 AM |
| C++ is better then C because it has two more plus's *troll face* |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Fl0x
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5169 |
|
|
| 26 Sep 2011 01:00 PM |
umg Neentendo'h uses C++ lul |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Sep 2011 04:39 PM |
@suicidextreme
Please get out...You know nothing about C and C++ please leave. This forum is for people who actually can script. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|