Asassin37
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 9116 |
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 07:47 PM |
| I'm guessing nothing would change... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 07:48 PM |
Nah.
invading Canada would give the world the casus beli it's been waiting for. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 07:49 PM |
| The Casus Belli to start a war and be crushed by the US military? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 07:50 PM |
| >implying the US can fight the whole world alone. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Asassin37
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 9116 |
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 07:51 PM |
The UN .VS. The US.
The UN wins. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 07:56 PM |
The US has a hegemony over the ocean. So the US could seize all of North America, South America, and the Caribbean. The world could not stop that. Then the US could island jump to Greenland, Iceland, and the UK. Then the issue is conquering Afro-Eurasia.
The US would certainly not lose. I don't think it could could conquer Afro-Eurasia, though. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 07:58 PM |
That would definitely turn into a long war...
But then there are nukes, or the threat of them. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Asassin37
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 9116 |
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 07:59 PM |
| I'm guessing the Germans, the British, and possibly the Chinese would counter it... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 08:01 PM |
china would love to have a legit reason to fight US.
Plus all that war spending would make up for not being able to export toys to USA.
They would export missiles and bullets.
It's a wonder what war does to the economy. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 08:02 PM |
I bet a country like Iran or NK would find make up some excuse to push a button. ___ LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!! I LOL'D SO HARD Iran and NK do not have missiles that can reach anywhere near USA.
The war would never end.
Nobody would fire nukes at USA. It's assurance that THEY would be nuked right back, with no assurance they could even drop one nuke on USA. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Asassin37
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 9116 |
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 08:04 PM |
| NATO would drive the US out, and China would start a full-scale invasion. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 08:06 PM |
NATO would drive the US out, ___ Yeah, how?
China would start a full-scale invasion. ___ LOL good luck with that. China's navy sucks. They could never transport a massive army to USA. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Asassin37
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 9116 |
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 08:08 PM |
NATO forces are far more advanced than US forces, and the US forces would be destroyed by Canadian resistance.
The chinese would have no problem attacking the coastline with the US focused on Canada. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 08:12 PM |
This has got to be a joke. USA has, by far, the #1 army, air force, and navy in the world.
Why would there be Canadian resistance any stronger than other resistances? Canadians have no guns.
WHY WOULD THE US NAVY BE FOCUSED ON CANADA. The US navy can crush every other navy in the world with ease. You know China would have a lot of trouble even invading Taiwan right? Chinese invasion of the US is absolutely ridiculous.
asassin = call of duty player |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Asassin37
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 9116 |
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 08:18 PM |
Chances are not every soldier in the military will be on active duty. Usually a small portion is sent on a tour of duty.
And the US navy isn't the strongest thing in the galaxy. The invention of military aircraft has kept the navy in it's place for 70 years now. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 08:23 PM |
Dude. The US navy has 2384 ships. The second closest is North Korea with 708 ships. And those North Korean ships are NOT HIGH QUALITY SHIPS !
You need a strong navy to get your soldiers from China across the Pacific to USA.
As for the Air Force, the US has 11 aircraft carriers. Next closest? Italy with ONLY 2 ! China doesn't have even ONE! How can China keep the US navy down if it can't use its air force on the ocean? The US also has 18,234 aircraft. Compared with China, which ONLY HAS 4,092 aircraft.
Just face it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
twigs182
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Apr 2008 |
| Total Posts: 2109 |
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 08:33 PM |
America dominates the sea and air.
Fact.
Any nation that would even declare war over that would be a western nation in Europe, but even then, its the US, so they would back down. Besides, most of Europes military is grounded in the future ground war against the Belusarians and Russians.
Fact.
The only nation that could even content with the US naval wise would be the Iranian Navy if it used missile boat wolfpack tactics, the Chinese military, or the Russian military. Both would be wiped out in days though.
Fact.
The only airforce to content with the USAF would be the Chinese or Russian airforces, yet they use crap aircraft. The only thing that could content with an F18, F16, or hell even a F35 would be the Eurofighter. Its got promised kills on the F18 and F16, but F35 would be a tough battle and would come down to pilot abilities.
Fact.
The only nation that could content with the US ground forces would be Germany. Now don't you go WHAAAA! BIAS! This is fact. The only reason the US beat Iraq in the 90s was a device called the MLRS, which Germany operates the most of besides the US. It also has the best SPGs, the best tanks, and the best IFVs with the MILAN launcher.
FACT! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
isherloxi
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2284 |
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 08:40 PM |
China' building an aircraft carrier supposely.
But if the us went to war with the whole world.Im pretty sure the we would not be scared to launch The minuteman missiles at the biggest threats to us in the war.Then most countries would think exchanging nuclear missiles would kill us all and won't launch back.
We could probably strike launch sites but mobile nukes are still a threat.And does thE us even have mobile nuclear missile launchers besides submarines?
Most countries in africa would hardly do anything.
South america would do a few small battles.
The middleast,asia and europe would be fighting.Then theres people who will never turn on america. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
twigs182
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Apr 2008 |
| Total Posts: 2109 |
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 08:49 PM |
China is using an outdated 1992 era 70% completed Ukrainian carrier fitted with new engines based on diesel.
ITS TOTALLY GONNA BEAT A NIMMITZ OR A FORD!
A Wasp could wiped the floor of that thing. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
isherloxi
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2284 |
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 08:50 PM |
Well atleast it's a carrier.One step towards making a navy.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
cowkiller
|
  |
| Joined: 03 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 4193 |
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 08:56 PM |
| why do people not realise that a country having the best something doesnt mean it can take on all the other nations with it :L |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
twigs182
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Apr 2008 |
| Total Posts: 2109 |
|
| |
|
zct30
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 272 |
|
|
| 15 Aug 2011 10:08 PM |
>FACTFACTFACT
It's like world view and the massive amounts of rioting and havoc and other shenanigans people like me would be wreaking inside this country wouldn't matter. I would pull up Britain. Fed up with the feds? The answer is to burn down random houses and steal expensive things. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|