|
| 25 Jun 2011 03:28 PM |
| Not long ago a submarine launched a torpedo at a South Korean fishing boat. BUT! Many believe it was a North Korean submarine that launched the torpedo. If this is proven (Which it isn't yet.) then it could mean ANOTHER Korean war with much more bloodshed. And possible support to North Kore by China and South Korea by the United States and maybe the UN. What do you think? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jun 2011 03:29 PM |
| One torpedo will then result in WWIII |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jun 2011 03:30 PM |
SK and UN will kick their ass in one minute
THE END OF WWIII |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Jun 2011 09:28 AM |
| I'm sorry SK? I don't know what that is... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 27 Jun 2011 10:22 AM |
| Oh well then. Why not just say "South K." or "S. Korea" Or "South Korea"? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Czechia
|
  |
| Joined: 10 May 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1860 |
|
|
| 27 Jun 2011 10:34 AM |
China made it clear that they will NOT help NK in their war against SK.
SK and their allies will kick out NK. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Aug 2011 11:32 AM |
| @Czechia Chinese are Communists. You can't trust ANYTHING they say. HAVE WE ALL FORGOTTEN THE COLD WAR!? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Kirby7678
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Feb 2008 |
| Total Posts: 8650 |
|
|
| 01 Aug 2011 11:33 AM |
| yes because that was the past |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Aug 2011 11:34 AM |
| @Kirby The past should never be forgotten. If you forget the past! You won't see the Future! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Aug 2011 11:35 AM |
The NK has WWII tech.
UN might not be involved. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
muztache
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Mar 2010 |
| Total Posts: 200 |
|
|
| 01 Aug 2011 11:37 AM |
NATO would automatically involve itself, and the UN defense council.
North Korea has nukes and thats the only reason we would be hesitant in war.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
1995jam2
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Jul 2008 |
| Total Posts: 13857 |
|
|
| 01 Aug 2011 11:38 AM |
| There won't be another war because UN practically owns South Korea. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
muztache
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Mar 2010 |
| Total Posts: 200 |
|
|
| 01 Aug 2011 11:41 AM |
The US has two Infantry divisons, one Marine division, and two Carriers in South Korea.
That's it.
Not exactly 'owning'. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Aug 2011 11:41 AM |
| @Muz Incorrect. China,USA,Russia,Israel,Pakistan,India,France,UK have nukes. NK has no nukes. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
1995jam2
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Jul 2008 |
| Total Posts: 13857 |
|
|
| 01 Aug 2011 11:41 AM |
| you have no idea how the government works there do you or that UN isn't just US don't you |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
muztache
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Mar 2010 |
| Total Posts: 200 |
|
|
| 01 Aug 2011 11:42 AM |
NK has fissionable materiel for about a half dozen nuclear warheads.
They also have short and medium range strategic missiles. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
BL88XER
|
  |
| Joined: 09 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 259 |
|
|
| 01 Aug 2011 11:42 AM |
| My Grandpa fought in the Korean War. Still alive to this day :D! He fought for the South Koreans and he told me the story of him killing a tank driver. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Kirby7678
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Feb 2008 |
| Total Posts: 8650 |
|
|
| 01 Aug 2011 11:43 AM |
@comrade
Oops, I forgot what I "learned" in school. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
muztache
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Mar 2010 |
| Total Posts: 200 |
|
|
| 01 Aug 2011 11:43 AM |
| All nations are part of the UN you idiot, the UN isn't an armed force. You're thinking of NATO, and the USA is the lead member of NATO AND the UN Defense council. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|