|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:11 AM |
| You're all lucky to be middle class people. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
TDFaIl
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 699 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:14 AM |
| Fail, I just checked it up on my Firefox spell checker, we both failed, it's bourgeois |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
McFlick
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 11090 |
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:15 AM |
> relying on a spell check
> haha noob |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:16 AM |
I wasn't relying, I was checking to see how it was spelled.
Obvious kiddy is obvious. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
meto02
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 11373 |
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:17 AM |
| I'm glad I never meet mcflick. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
TDFaIl
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 699 |
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:17 AM |
| I just searched it myself in disbelief; I spelled it right, you're using an alternate spelling. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:18 AM |
@Meto He's obviously a child. We should leave him alone. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:18 AM |
| Wow, my English teacher is a liar. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:19 AM |
| Wait, that was Bourgeoisie, Bourgeois means middle class, I was right :D |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
TDFaIl
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 699 |
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:27 AM |
"bour·geoi·sie/ˌbo͝orZHwäˈzē/Noun 1. The middle class, typically referring to its perceived materialistic values or conventional attitudes"
Someone tell me what is wrong with this guy's eyesight. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:28 AM |
^ "The middle class" "Materialistic Values" "Conventional attitudes"
I'm sure if you understood big words you would know. :3 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
TDFaIl
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 699 |
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:29 AM |
Not sure if trolling
or just very stupid |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:30 AM |
| No you obviously don't have a high standard vocabulary. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
TDFaIl
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 699 |
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:31 AM |
>high standard vocabulary
That is not even grammatically correct. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:32 AM |
*Looks up*
Well apparently so, I see no complaints.
Learn English or get out. >:O |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
TDFaIl
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 699 |
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:34 AM |
Wikipedia (i/ˌwɪkɨˈpiːdi.ə/ or i/ˌwɪkiˈpiːdi.ə/ wik-i-pee-dee-ə) is a free, web-based, collaborative, multilingual encyclopedia project supported by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation. Its 19 million articles (over 3.6 million in English) have been written collaboratively by volunteers around the world, and almost all of its articles can be edited by anyone with access to the site.[3] As of July 2011, there were editions of Wikipedia in 282 languages. Wikipedia was launched in 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger[4] and has become the largest and most popular general reference work on the Internet,[2][5][6][7] ranking around seventh among all websites on Alexa and having 365 million readers.[2][8] The name Wikipedia was coined by Larry Sanger[9] and is a combination of wiki (a technology for creating collaborative websites, from the Hawaiian word wiki, meaning "quick") and encyclopedia. Wikipedia's departure from the expert-driven style of encyclopedia building and the large presence of unacademic content has been noted several times. When Time magazine recognized You as its Person of the Year for 2006, acknowledging the accelerating success of online collaboration and interaction by millions of users around the world, it cited Wikipedia as one of several examples of Web 2.0 services, along with YouTube, MySpace, and Facebook.[10] Some have noted the importance of Wikipedia not only as an encyclopedic reference but also as a frequently updated news resource because of how quickly articles about recent events appear.[11][12] Students have been assigned to write Wikipedia articles as an exercise in clearly and succinctly explaining difficult concepts to an uninitiated audience.[13] Although the policies of Wikipedia strongly espouse verifiability and a neutral point of view, critics of Wikipedia accuse it of systemic bias and inconsistencies (including undue weight given to popular culture),[14] and allege that it favors consensus over credentials in its editorial processes.[15] Its reliability and accuracy are also targeted.[16] Other criticisms center on its susceptibility to vandalism and the addition of spurious or unverified information;[17] however, scholarly work suggests that vandalism is generally short-lived.[18][19] A 2005 investigation in Nature showed that the science articles they compared came close to the level of accuracy of Encyclopædia Britannica and had a similar rate of "serious errors."[20] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 01:36 AM |
I was really lazy to read, so heres a site i found with this that involves grammar:
The problem is of lack of proper vocabulary or no-vocabulary and all these exams require high standard of vocabulary. As we have identified the reasons for .. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|