Cewyah
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Feb 2017 |
| Total Posts: 5713 |
|
|
| 09 Sep 2017 10:19 PM |
Know that in most cases it wouldn't be practical to use wait(100) but, is it possible?
R+://837799844 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
KEVEKEV77
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 6961 |
|
| |
|
|
| 09 Sep 2017 10:21 PM |
| It doesn't say, but I'm betting that it's VERY high |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 Sep 2017 10:23 PM |
| It probabally will allow you to go on forever, but start glitching out at about at a 32 bit integer |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 Sep 2017 10:23 PM |
It's nothing that's observable.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Cewyah
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Feb 2017 |
| Total Posts: 5713 |
|
|
| 09 Sep 2017 10:25 PM |
Good, bet no one would probably use wait(24935832590326893263296293626296) or something like that. :D
R+://837799844 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 Sep 2017 10:26 PM |
wait(math.huge) maybe?
JoshScript is my "programming language" 😎😎😎 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 Sep 2017 10:28 PM |
The real question is how little can it wait
wait(10/math.huge) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 Sep 2017 10:34 PM |
"...how little a wait can go"
wait() is usually around 1/30 of a second. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
cabbler
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Jun 2015 |
| Total Posts: 735 |
|
|
| 09 Sep 2017 11:49 PM |
| Most likely the typical ~ 2 billion limit. which is over 60 years. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 Sep 2017 11:56 PM |
this will OBVIOUSLY be needed for those games in the ads where you got the youtuber playing for 60 years to collect all the poke knives.
Hopefully i'm not the only person whos seen this ad |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Sep 2017 12:29 AM |
| I think its ########## (68 years..?) attempt to index global 'soul' (a nil value) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Sep 2017 12:33 AM |
Or its the digit right before roblox makes a number math.huge()
attempt to index global 'soul' (a nil value) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|