SpliTech
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 11407 |
|
|
| 29 Aug 2017 09:44 AM |
if the present didn't exist the past which was in the past considered the present would still be the present
mind blown
subforum machine 🅱roke |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Aug 2017 09:45 AM |
my mind isn't blown because what you said wasn't confusing you're just saying that if we went a little backward in time, what we currently consider the present wouldn't exist and the past would become the present as it once was
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
SpliTech
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 11407 |
|
|
| 29 Aug 2017 09:47 AM |
the present would exist and be considered the future tho
subforum machine 🅱roke |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 29 Aug 2017 09:51 AM |
"if the present didn't exist the past which was in the past considered the present would still be the present"
COPYPASTA CONFIRMED |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Aug 2017 09:52 AM |
But the present had to exist because the past is the present of its time Calculating (T-) If the present where to be destroyed it would create a C vortex SO T-C should equal to the equation. Calculating the Equation of time travel Which of course it
CxE2 (E=Mc2)
We would need to calculate the distance between the present and the past But to do that we need to know how far the past and present is. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Aug 2017 09:56 AM |
The past is already the present As if you were to time travel it would be the present to the people living in the past which means that time traveling is not to the past but to the distant future (C+T= T-T) If you get my drift |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|