Alloviser
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 17236 |
|
| |
|
CheveIle
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 15607 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 02:45 AM |
no im beating him up ingame rn;;;;
I Love To Boost! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 02:46 AM |
why you ask
A good demand it cannot be a rare But thats a good doing item [rocks value changer] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Alloviser
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 17236 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 02:51 AM |
| Could you recheck eerie on rocks? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 02:52 AM |
is something wrong with it
A good demand it cannot be a rare But thats a good doing item [rocks value changer] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Alloviser
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 17236 |
|
| |
|
Alloviser
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 17236 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 02:55 AM |
| well I saw you was the one who changed it's value so I think contacting you would be the best choice |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 02:56 AM |
that was teoc not me but is there something wrong with the value?
A good demand it cannot be a rare But thats a good doing item [rocks value changer] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Alloviser
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 17236 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 02:57 AM |
ohh right sorry it was "outfiter"
"TheEpicOutfitChanger has changed this item's Value"
but yeah i think it's still inaccurate wrong and I provided enough proof, teoc just hates me because of that antennas thing |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Alloviser
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 17236 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 02:59 AM |
| also I dont want to accuse teoc of something but I kinda think he wants to keep eerie low on rocks for self purpouses (he was looking for eerie too) but again it's only my guess |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 03:00 AM |
he was the one to bring up raising eerie... and 1m is a fair value for now, since there's only the one guy whos been offering
A good demand it cannot be a rare But thats a good doing item [rocks value changer] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
indy5c
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Jun 2017 |
| Total Posts: 5900 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 03:01 AM |
teoc is the one who raised it wat u mean he keepin it low
i fear 7-up .0. (kamiyama/spiffy5(c)/indy5c) - I work for rocks!!! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Alloviser
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 17236 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 03:10 AM |
| he raised it to 1m from 950k when it has untaken 1.2m offer |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 03:11 AM |
it hasnt had any other offer besides that one i do realize its a rare that never gets traded, but... it wouldnt be right to raise it to 1.2m after one trade
A good demand it cannot be a rare But thats a good doing item [rocks value changer] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Alloviser
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 17236 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 03:16 AM |
Personally I had 2 trades from him. One pstf+cri and other one pstf+cri+rbadams+stunna shades
And other owners rejected that as well I could give proof?? I mean all the owners values eerie > pstf even when some of them own eerie and pstf together so idk 1.15m I think would be fairest bucause it eerie has untaken like 2.25m offer
If I'm wrong or something or you guys need more proof just ask me or check rocks value request, I provided lots of proof |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 03:18 AM |
2 trades from the same guy if at least 1-2 other people offered around the same/at least over 1.1m like he did, then it would be fair to give it a raise
A good demand it cannot be a rare But thats a good doing item [rocks value changer] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Alloviser
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 17236 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 03:24 AM |
but he offered the same to all active eerie owners and they have rejected that isn't that enough proof??
And eerie went for 1.1m+ for sure like month ago when sql was at the bottom for sql++ (atm the entire other side was around 1.1m+) but I think I couldn't provide proof of that and as theepicvalue said using old trades is not okay so I will end with that sql trade
But if pstf is 1.1m on rocks, just saying that eerie should be worth more than that because eerie owners values eerie>pstf
idk am I wrong?
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 03:29 AM |
using old trades is only (somewhat) accepted IF the item has gone for NOTHING, and i mean NOTHING since completed. however, it wouldve been better if the trade had been sent in earlier
A good demand it cannot be a rare But thats a good doing item [rocks value changer] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 03:33 AM |
like i already said though, we need more proof than just one desperate guy who really wants eerie and is oping a lot to consider it for a raise
right now, 1m is a fair value.
A good demand it cannot be a rare But thats a good doing item [rocks value changer] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Alloviser
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 17236 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 03:35 AM |
It was sent so rocks changed value from 900 to 950 when it went for 1.1m
Now when it has 1.2m untaken offer it got raised by 50k again (so it's 1m on rocks now)
Could someone explain why is it working like this?? I mean for example when sql got traded once for alot now it's value was raised by 200k straight away??
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Alloviser
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 17236 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 03:36 AM |
Also would it be enough proof if lg actually COMPLETED the trade? I mean like seriously eerie owners aren't willing to trade their eeries but I just think you guys will just raise eerie by 50k again even when the trade will be completed so maybe it's not even worth my time trying to get eerie for LG
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 03:38 AM |
okay; sql wasn't 'once' we were given 3-4 trades of it going for 700k-750k however, the decision was made late at night, and when some other vc'ers woke up and saw the change it was rethought, and everyone agreed 600k is a more 'fair' value
A good demand it cannot be a rare But thats a good doing item [rocks value changer] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Alloviser
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 17236 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 03:39 AM |
But big items gets traded more rarely.. Just look at wwc
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 03:41 AM |
im gonna stop now; we're not raising eerie any more until more proof arises of it getting over said value (and not from lg)
A good demand it cannot be a rare But thats a good doing item [rocks value changer] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Alloviser
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 17236 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2017 03:42 AM |
not worth my time because rocks will raise it maximum by 50k again so nvm too lol
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|