|
| 24 Jun 2017 09:17 PM |
| Why do people consider it the best game on the console? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 24 Jun 2017 09:28 PM |
| Legend of Zelda (the original, duh) was better. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
thrift00
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 3884 |
|
| |
|
|
| 24 Jun 2017 11:07 PM |
| Their both good. But theirs no way to saw which is better because on how different the games are. It would be like comparing Call Of Duty to Mortal Kombat. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
min1up
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Oct 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2712 |
|
|
| 24 Jun 2017 11:15 PM |
"It would be like comparing Call Of Duty to Mortal Kombat."
I disagree with this so much.
Even if those are two different games, they still can be compared in design choices, execution, and overall enjoyment.
For example: Don't Starve Together (Madness Mode) is better than Left 4 Dead 2. A top-down multiplayer survival game that is extremely difficult to a first person zombie shooter that *requires* on co-op but not too difficult.
Even though those games are completely different, the aesthetic and the overpowering dread Don't Starve Together gives off is way better than Left 4 Dead 2. For pure enjoyment purposes, Don't Starve Together weaves something that builds you with expectation along with fear with what is to come in the future, something that is way more enjoyable than Left 4 Dead 2's "go from A to B" expectation.
Also Don't Starve Together is just more fun to me. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jun 2017 01:22 AM |
I like the original SMB more. I haven't played Super Mario Bros 2 yet (the real one)
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
lan641
|
  |
| Joined: 03 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 20 |
|
| |
|
|
| 25 Jun 2017 07:04 AM |
| Now I do agree they're both quality games. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|