strongyos
|
  |
| Joined: 08 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 104 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 02:46 PM |
not just becuase of varcia, bc they want an endurance war again so they can be sure they never lose lol pretty cowardly move
and they also dont want any terms so they can cheat use dirty tactics etc |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2017 02:47 PM |
| csp can do the same????????????????? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Conetic
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Sep 2009 |
| Total Posts: 23293 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 02:48 PM |
wouldn't expect much less from an inferior fighting force
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
HateHaze
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jul 2014 |
| Total Posts: 2265 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 02:50 PM |
@und no no no you're missing it, csp v vak in an endurance war? plus using a different base?
vak probably wont use dirty tactics but they basically are playing dirty just because they're trying to make it an endurance war.
only reason tgi didnt beat vak is because vak was cowardly and called an endurance war instead of a straight up regular war
clearly csp will most likely win vs vak in a reuglar war if both bases used their regular forts, csp has been getting SO many wins in the past month at smo, hence why they're changing the war base to prevent that "undefeated" in wars from changing |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2017 02:51 PM |
| did tgi declare an endurance war though? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
HateHaze
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jul 2014 |
| Total Posts: 2265 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 02:51 PM |
| i dont remember but if they did it basically was a trap and so dumb. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2017 02:52 PM |
See -> https://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=105793217
"This will not be a war of raid victories. This will not be a war of silly final battles or whose egos are the biggest. This is going to be a war of endurance,"
-Toberdam in his initial declaration. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
HateHaze
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jul 2014 |
| Total Posts: 2265 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 02:53 PM |
| most likely vak probably wouldnt comply with an actual war |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2017 02:55 PM |
vak knows that csp is just being hyped up
so
an endurance war will kill that |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
HateHaze
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jul 2014 |
| Total Posts: 2265 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 02:56 PM |
| explain the change in the base then? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
strongyos
|
  |
| Joined: 08 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 104 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 02:57 PM |
| but u cant expect less from those coward no life kids |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2017 03:01 PM |
change of base:
See -> https://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=216428431
"let's have a real fight." >equal numbers where it's purely based on skill
"No more doubts about the truly superior clan." >completely mirrored battlegrounds to show that if vak can't win there they're bad
"Glory to Vaktovia!" >agree |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Brutecus
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4031 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 03:02 PM |
@Hate
There is nothing "dirty" about an endurance war. Unless you're saying CSP can't hold up the fight and they know this.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
HateHouse
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Aug 2013 |
| Total Posts: 8815 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 03:05 PM |
"Unless you're saying CSP can't hold up the fight and they know this." We very well know VAK will NEVER surrender, you know you can't defend SMO now as you lose on a daily, and you can't win at CSP's base at all, this is the easy way out. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2017 03:05 PM |
csp is gonna be calling vak dirty because they just want to fight based on bases
and not an equal battlefield
anyone can win at a base
but winning at a symmetrical battlefield with equal numbers? that shows true skill AND which clan is superior. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
HateHouse
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Aug 2013 |
| Total Posts: 8815 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 03:21 PM |
| @Under then let it be to a set amount of wins. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
c4spian
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 12282 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 03:31 PM |
it's not even the fact that they're using an unfamiliar battleground with their weapons, it's that they call it an endurance war instead of a war where you can actually determine a winner
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
theNBK
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jun 2015 |
| Total Posts: 1779 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 03:33 PM |
| No point in an endurance war when VAK and or CSP will just refuse to defend without consequence and go inactive, saying the war is still going on. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
c4spian
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 12282 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 03:33 PM |
"csp is gonna be calling vak dirty because they just want to fight based on bases
and not an equal battlefield
anyone can win at a base
but winning at a symmetrical battlefield with equal numbers? that shows true skill AND which clan is superior."
-it doesn't show true skill because no matter how many wins we get they don't have to surrender, they can just keep playing, it's roblox it's not like you get worn down over losing -the battlefield isn't the problem although they use it all the time and it's their weapons -"anyone can win at a base" we won at their base countless times and they won like once at ours
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Brutecus
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4031 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 03:36 PM |
No negotiations and I doubt Vaktus is changing anything. Accept or don't, NBK. VAK will be alive and well after this. Your choices here on out are for the well being of CSP.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
c4spian
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 12282 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 03:37 PM |
just know that you can't beat CSP in a regular war so you manipulate it to make yourselves look better
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
HateHouse
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Aug 2013 |
| Total Posts: 8815 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 03:37 PM |
| Then let the war not happen, CSP doesn't need the war anyway. Stop trying to get CSP to fall for VAK's failed of a bait. VAK going the easy way out is a disappointment. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
HateHaze
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jul 2014 |
| Total Posts: 2265 |
|
|
| 12 May 2017 03:38 PM |
| Then let the war not happen, CSP doesn't need the war anyway. Stop trying to get CSP to fall for VAK's failed of a bait. VAK going the easy way out is a disappointment. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2017 03:38 PM |
>completely mirrored battlegrounds to show that if vak can't win there they're bad
my main point
is that if you do get lots more wins than vak
it'll show theyre bad
so no one will be interested to join vak/vac
and people will leave because they'll lose interest in the clan
and vak will either officially surrender or die out |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|