7_c
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Mar 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1133 |
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:26 AM |
| If it was flat, then why didn't we fall off yet? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
weezie
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Jan 2008 |
| Total Posts: 978 |
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:26 AM |
| HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM. HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:36 AM |
what a stupid point
"If it was flat, then why didn't we fall off yet?"
A. It's not like they live to tell you, don't they?
B. Essentially no one has been to Antarctica due to the Antarctic Treaty.
C. It's unknown if the earth even *has* an edge. If space doesn't have an edge why does the earth have to/ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:37 AM |
Here's some questions for you, round earthers.
==𝙌𝙐𝙀𝙎𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉𝙎==
1. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗱𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 "𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲", 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝗻-𝗮𝗿𝗯𝗶𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗮 𝗱𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗳𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀?
2. 𝗗𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘀𝘂𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲?
3. 𝗗𝗼𝗲𝘀 *𝗮𝗻𝘆* 𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙨 (𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆), 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝗻-𝗮𝗿𝗯𝗶𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗮 𝗱𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗳𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀?
4. 𝗣𝗵𝗼𝘁𝗼𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗱, 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗽𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗲𝘁𝗰. 𝗜 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗴𝗼 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗽𝗵𝗼𝘁𝗼𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗨𝗙𝗢'𝘀, 𝗕𝗶𝗴𝗳𝗼𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝘁𝗰. 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗜 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮. 𝗗𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗽𝗵𝗼𝘁𝗼𝘀 𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙨?
5. 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿, 𝗪. 𝗪𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗸𝗹𝗲𝗿 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗥𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵’𝘀 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗰𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲, 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴, “𝘼𝙨 𝙖𝙣 𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙛 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜, 𝙄 𝙨𝙖𝙬 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙖𝙗𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙙 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙤𝙣𝙡𝙮 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙣 𝙨𝙘𝙝𝙤𝙤𝙡 𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙠𝙨. 𝙉𝙤 𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙚𝙧 𝙬𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙙𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙢 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙣𝙮𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙙. 𝙄 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙬𝙖𝙮𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙡𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙝𝙖𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙣 𝙗𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙤𝙛, 𝙢𝙪𝙘𝙝 𝙡𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙙 𝙛𝙤𝙧. 𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙫𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙢𝙚𝙖𝙣𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 - 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙞𝙩 𝙞𝙨 8” 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙞𝙧𝙨𝙩 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙖 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙡, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤 𝙗𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙦𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚𝙨; 𝙩𝙝𝙪𝙨 𝙖 𝙨𝙢𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙣𝙖𝙫𝙞𝙜𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙗𝙤𝙖𝙩𝙨, 𝙨𝙖𝙮 30 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜, 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚, 𝙗𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙫𝙚 𝙧𝙪𝙡𝙚 𝙖𝙣 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙫𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙤𝙛 600 𝙛𝙚𝙚𝙩. 𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙚 𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙩 𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙖𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙗𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙦𝙪𝙞𝙩𝙚 𝙨𝙪𝙘𝙝 𝙛𝙤𝙤𝙡𝙨. 𝙉𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙤𝙧𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙙. 𝙒𝙚 𝙣𝙤 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙜 600 𝙛𝙚𝙚𝙩 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙖 𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙛 30 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙤𝙧 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙡, 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙬𝙖𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙧𝙮𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙤 𝙨𝙦𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙞𝙧𝙘𝙡𝙚”
𝗔. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 "𝗰𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲" 𝗽𝘂𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝗡𝗔𝗦𝗔 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘄𝗮𝘆, 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗴𝗲𝘀?
𝗕. 𝗗𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝘀 *𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿* 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗲-𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱-𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗼𝗿𝘆?
𝗖. 𝗗𝘂𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗹𝗮𝘁 𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗻𝗼 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘂𝗱𝗲?
6. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗹𝗮𝘁-𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁?
7. 𝗔𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝗻 𝗡𝗔𝗦𝗔'𝘀 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗶𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗲𝘀, 𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘂𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗲𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝘁𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗼𝗰𝗲𝗮𝗻. 𝗗𝘂𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀, 𝘄𝗲 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗡𝗔𝗦𝗔 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗽𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗽𝗵𝗼𝘁𝗼𝘀. 𝗗𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗲'𝘀 𝗼𝗯𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗡𝗔𝗦𝗔'𝘀 𝗽𝗵𝗼𝘁𝗼𝘀?
8. 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗱𝗶𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗮 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗷𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗿𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗼 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝗳 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲?
9. 𝗗𝗼 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗮𝗿𝗴𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗼𝗻 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗰𝗶𝗿𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗮 𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗮𝗿𝗴𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 *𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻'𝘁* 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗶𝗿𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴?
10. 𝗜𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗰𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀?
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:41 AM |
"𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 "𝗰𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲" 𝗽𝘂𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝗡𝗔𝗦𝗔 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘄𝗮𝘆, 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗴𝗲𝘀?"
the earths curvature is not noticable enough to the point where you dont have to take into account the curvature of earth
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:42 AM |
the earth is flat because i say it is!!!! >:-(
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:43 AM |
"the earths curvature is not noticable enough to the point where you dont have to take into account the curvature of earth"
Incorrect.
As noted, if the earth was round, any construction would have to factor in ==600 FEET== of curvature. However, they *NEVER* DO.
𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙪𝙚𝙯 𝘾𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙈𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙍𝙚𝙙 𝙎𝙚𝙖 𝙞𝙨 100 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙡𝙤𝙘𝙠𝙨 𝙢𝙖𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙖𝙣 𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙪𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙬𝙤 𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙨. 𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙚𝙙, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙀𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙝’𝙨 𝙨𝙪𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙫𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙣 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙘𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙩, 𝙞𝙩 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙙𝙪𝙜 𝙖𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙖 𝙝𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙯𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙡 𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙢 𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚 26 𝙛𝙚𝙚𝙩 𝙗𝙚𝙡𝙤𝙬 𝙨𝙚𝙖-𝙡𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙡, 𝙥𝙖𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙤𝙪𝙜𝙝 𝙨𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝙡𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙨 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙖 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧, 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙢 𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙬𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙧’𝙨 𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙛𝙖𝙘𝙚 𝙧𝙪𝙣𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙛𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙡𝙮 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙡 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 100 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚𝙨.
𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙇𝙤𝙣𝙙𝙤𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙉𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙝𝙬𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙣 𝙍𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙨 𝙖 𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚 180 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙗𝙚𝙩𝙬𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙇𝙤𝙣𝙙𝙤𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙇𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙥𝙤𝙤𝙡. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙧𝙤𝙖𝙙’𝙨 𝙝𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙥𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙩, 𝙢𝙞𝙙𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙖𝙩 𝘽𝙞𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙝𝙖𝙢 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙞𝙨 𝙤𝙣𝙡𝙮 240 𝙛𝙚𝙚𝙩 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙫𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙖-𝙡𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙡. 𝙄𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙖 𝙜𝙡𝙤𝙗𝙚, 𝙝𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧, 𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 8 𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙨 𝙥𝙚𝙧 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚 𝙨𝙦𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙙, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 180 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙚𝙩𝙘𝙝 𝙤𝙛 𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙡 𝙬𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙢 𝙖𝙣 𝙖𝙧𝙘 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙥𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙩 𝙖𝙩 𝘽𝙞𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙝𝙖𝙢 𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙖 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚, 𝙖 𝙛𝙪𝙡𝙡 5,400 𝙛𝙚𝙚𝙩 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙫𝙚 𝙇𝙤𝙣𝙙𝙤𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙇𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙥𝙤𝙤𝙡.
𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿, 𝗪. 𝗪𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗸𝗹𝗲𝗿 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗥𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵’𝘀 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗰𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲, 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴, “𝘼𝙨 𝙖𝙣 𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙛 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜, 𝙄 𝙨𝙖𝙬 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙖𝙗𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙙 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙤𝙣𝙡𝙮 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙣 𝙨𝙘𝙝𝙤𝙤𝙡 𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙠𝙨. 𝙉𝙤 𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙚𝙧 𝙬𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙙𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙢 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙣𝙮𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙙. 𝙄 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙬𝙖𝙮𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙡𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙝𝙖𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙣 𝙗𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙤𝙛, 𝙢𝙪𝙘𝙝 𝙡𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙙 𝙛𝙤𝙧. 𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙫𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙢𝙚𝙖𝙣𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 - 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙞𝙩 𝙞𝙨 8” 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙞𝙧𝙨𝙩 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙖 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙡, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤 𝙗𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙦𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚𝙨; 𝙩𝙝𝙪𝙨 𝙖 𝙨𝙢𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙣𝙖𝙫𝙞𝙜𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙗𝙤𝙖𝙩𝙨, 𝙨𝙖𝙮 30 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜, 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚, 𝙗𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙫𝙚 𝙧𝙪𝙡𝙚 𝙖𝙣 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙫𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙤𝙛 600 𝙛𝙚𝙚𝙩. 𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙚 𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙩 𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙖𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙗𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙦𝙪𝙞𝙩𝙚 𝙨𝙪𝙘𝙝 𝙛𝙤𝙤𝙡𝙨. 𝙉𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙤𝙧𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙙. 𝙒𝙚 𝙣𝙤 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙜 600 𝙛𝙚𝙚𝙩 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙖 𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙛 30 𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙤𝙧 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙡, 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙬𝙖𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙧𝙮𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙤 𝙨𝙦𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙞𝙧𝙘𝙡𝙚” |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:46 AM |
I can go on, almost forever. Here's some *excellent* flat earth stuff you should look into.
==𝗙𝘂𝗿𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗙𝗹𝗮𝘁 𝗘𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗮𝘁==
1. 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗿 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸 𝗙𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝗦𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗵𝘄𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗧𝗲𝘅𝗮𝘀 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗞𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗮𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗙𝗹𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗮 𝗣𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗮𝗸𝗲
2. 𝗧𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘀 𝗪𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗭𝗲𝘁𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗖𝗼𝘀𝗺𝗼𝗴𝗼𝗻𝘆
3. 𝗦𝗲𝗲 𝗦𝗮𝗺𝘂𝗲𝗹 𝗕𝗶𝗿𝗹𝗲𝘆 𝗥𝗼𝘄𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗺'𝘀 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗲𝗱𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗕𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗘𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗚𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗮 𝗙𝗹𝗮𝘁 𝗘𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵
4. 𝗔 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗱 𝗟𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝗕𝗹𝗻𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗥𝗼𝘄𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗺'𝘀 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸: 𝗟𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝗕𝗹𝗻𝘁 𝗧𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹𝘀
5. 𝗜𝗻 𝗔 𝗵𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗳𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗴𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗲 𝗯𝘆 𝗠𝗿. 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵'𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝗻-𝗴𝗹𝗼𝗯𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆.
6. 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗸 "𝗧𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗮 𝗙𝗶𝗿𝗺𝗮 1901" 𝗯𝘆 𝗗𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗱 𝗪𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗹𝗮𝘄 𝗦𝗰𝗼𝘁𝘁 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗳𝗮𝘃𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗙𝗹𝗮𝘁 𝗘𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵
7. 200 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗦𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗕𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝘆 𝗘𝗿𝗶𝗰 𝗗𝘂𝗯𝗮𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝘀 *𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲* 𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗯𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗶𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗼𝗻. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:47 AM |
lmao stop making up facts, earth is obviously flat 😂😂😂😂
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:47 AM |
gravity would become weaker if we went further away from the core. so yes it's not flat also appolo already had a pic of it
The Silent Client is Silent cause this Signature has to rhyme, okay? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Precluded
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1513 |
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:48 AM |
earth is flat and i have proof
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:49 AM |
earth is flat and i have proof [2]
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:50 AM |
The north pole is the only place we are not allowed to visit, the flat world chart says that its accutaly the edge of the world
next to that, if you look at flight routes, youll see that they dont go straight, but on the flat earth chart they do |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:51 AM |
"gravity would become weaker if we went further away from the core. so yes it's not flat also appolo already had a pic of it"
gravity is not real
NASA even admitted that their photos of the earth are fake |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:51 AM |
One more example of engineers that should've considered in curvature but didn't:
The Grand Bridge is 104.2 miles, but surveyors and the engineers who construed stated that no curvature of the earth was accounted for during construction, but, however, if the earth was a globe, that would've had to factor in for a 6990.50 foot drop. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:53 AM |
"gravity would become weaker if we went further away from the core"
I can put my argument in a syllogism:
Premise 1: Gravity become weaker if we went further away from the core Premise 2: Gravity doesn't exist on a flat earth Conclusion 1: Ergo, "gravity" doesn't become weaker if we went further away.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
RelmC
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Sep 2013 |
| Total Posts: 4160 |
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:54 AM |
"gravity is not real" are you serious |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:55 AM |
Read this round earthers: Why the earth is flat!
𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗢𝗻𝗲: 𝗚𝘆𝗿𝗼𝘀𝗰𝗼𝗽𝗲𝘀
Definition from Wikipedia: 𝘈 𝘨𝘺𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘱𝘦, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘨𝘺𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘴, 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘦𝘭 𝘮𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘢 𝘨𝘪𝘮𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘢𝘹𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘪𝘵𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘸𝘢𝘺. 𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘱𝘶𝘯 𝘶𝘱 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘹𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘥𝘶𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘸 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘮, 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘢 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘦𝘭 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘧𝘪𝘹𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦 (𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘧𝘪𝘹𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘯 𝘌𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘩). 𝘚𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘵 𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘴, 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘰𝘣𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘯 𝘌𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢 𝘨𝘺𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘱𝘦'𝘴 𝘢𝘹𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭 𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 24 𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴.
Anyone who has ever owned a gyroscope can verify that they do verify that they do very curious things, even seemingly defying "gravity" sometimes. This experiment show both that the earth is NOT rotating, and can't be a ball. Gyroscopes have been spun up for hours at a time, and not even the slightest of rotations can be observed. Attitude indicators operate by use of a basic gyroscope. If the earth were a ball, spinning, wobbling, going around the sun, which is bolting around our galaxy, that is rocketing around the universe at a combined rate of about 1,000 miles per second, they would be virtually useless, especially on transcontinental flights. Some higher end smart phones are equipped with a built in gyroscope. If yours has one, download any decent pitch indicator, and leave it on your night stand when you go to bed. Wake up in the morning and see for yourself that the phone has not moved or changed it's angle the entire time. Since your average person can get a good gyro and produce these same results, this is another (objective) empirically experimental proof that the earth is flat, and it isn't spinning.
𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝘄𝗼: 𝗡𝗼 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲
Preface: Why were we never taught the curvature of the earth? We see the flatness everywhere. Go to the beach, look to the horizon, flat. They tell you it's because of the earth's monstrous size that we can't see any c In the second ################## ####2 inches; in the third mile, 72 inches, or 6 feet.
use, first discovered by a flat earther in the ####### #### ### Samuel: IF the earth is a globe, and is 25,. As I'm sure you have or will do now, a Google search provides a reasonably small amount of curvature for a mile, but further investigation provides a diagr From the summit of any such arc there will exist a curvature or declination of 8 inches in the first statute mile. In the second mil######f####w### ####2 inches; in the third mile, 72 inches, or 6 feet.
use, first discovered by a flat earther in the 1800's. From Dr. Samuel: IF the earth is a globe, and is 25,000 English statute miles in circumference, the surface of all standing water must have a certain degree of convexity--every part must be an arc of a circle. From the summit of any such arc there will exist a curvature or declination of 8 inches in the first statute mile. In the second mile the fall will be 32 inches; in the third mile, 72 inches, or 6 feet.
The formula for calculating how much curvature is M^2X8=the amount of curvature in inches, where M is the mileage.
Joshua Nowicki has been photographing the Chicago skyline for a few years now. As the crow files, this is 57 miles, which should yield 2,166 feet of drop. (57X57X8/12=2,166') This would be impossible if he were doing so on a ball that is 25,000 miles in circumference. Modern science tells us that this is a mirage, but again, anyone who's actually seen a mirage, superior or otherwise, will agree that mirages are just "reflections" most of the time they are greatly distorted, and always upside down. Granted, visibility factors such as atmospheric blocking and waves and swells on lake Michigan sometimes do not grant this sight always, but the skyline is seen on a regular basis. This isn't the only instance of people being able to see further than they should, in fact, people are recently testing the globe, and the flatness of water to see landmarks that should be well over the curvature of the earth, and every time this test is done, no curvature can be found. This can be done easily if there is a fairly large body of water near you. All you need is a decent camera and the earth curvature calculator. This is yet another empirical proof that the earth is flat.
𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗼 𝗯𝗿𝗼𝗮𝗱𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 1915
The radio broadcast of 1915 would be impossible on a globe. Having no relay towers then, and seeing how radio waves do not travel in curved lines around a ball, my opponent must explain how this is possible. At 3,800 miles, there should be a 1,823.232 curve of water between the two, not to mention the distance to Honolulu. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Azciy
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2006 |
| Total Posts: 295 |
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:56 AM |
.
I hope this doesn't get filtered |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:56 AM |
""gravity is not real" are you serious"
Yes, this video explains several reasons why it is probable gravity isn't real:
/watch?v=kV_28NhcLGM |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 29 Apr 2017 08:57 AM |
| Isn't gravity a funny thing? It can hold oceans to the ground yet allows birds to defy it just by flapping its wing. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|