|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:06 PM |
The following legislation has passed the House of Representatives and is now to be voted on in the Senate
https://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=212708298
Please post your vote below
-Luke Hefner, PPT |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:07 PM |
nay that clause is there to prevent bribery between the executive and legislative branch and removing it just so that this representative can get a position isnt a really justifiable reason to amend our constitution
are we 2 really start changing the const just for personal benefits
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Twittered
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2015 |
| Total Posts: 222 |
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:14 PM |
Nay per the Minority Leader.
- Senator Karl Rove [R-CA]
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:15 PM |
| Aye- If we don't have this ### why do we have this here, if a Senator or House wishes to leave for a Directorship or Cabinet Position they should have the right to with this they cannot leave no matter what even if they resign, So they have to work even if they don't what to do the job which, so basically they are basically forced to work, which is basically ######## |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:21 PM |
| ############ we have it there for the same reason it's in the real life constitution - to prevent possible bribery between the legislative and executive branches |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:21 PM |
| nevermind, this hasn't gotten ###### in the house |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:25 PM |
| ######### Why would people bribe, With this clause you basically f over the Senators who get Nominated for a Directorial or Cabinet position in the Executive Branch, and even if they resign they get stuck in Congress no matter what happens. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:29 PM |
its not a matter of WHY would people bribe its a matter of preventing it
if you get elected to congress you either resign for a justified reason or you serve out your tenure and represent those who elected you - you will not leave just so you can get a director or deputy director etc position because you are tired of congress, that's not how this works.
i oppose this and will continue to oppose any repeal of this, if you make a commitment to congress then you keep your commitment and serve your tenure
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:32 PM |
| But Surprise this clause is not in #### Why you have a clause which PREVENTS QUALIFIED CONGRESSMEN from taking any head of agencies/Departments, You're basically forcing them to serve out the tenure even if they Don't want to, I find that unconstitutional. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:34 PM |
| this clause is in ### constitution for one (assuming thats what u said since it got hashtagged) and it doesnt FORCE anyone to serve out their tenure, they are free to resign however what they arent free to do is resign just so they can go out and get a cabinet or director post |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:36 PM |
Nay.
Keep your promises to the people who vot
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:36 PM |
https://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=212283509
My waiver got passed by the house.
9 Ayes 3 Nays 1 abstain
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:37 PM |
You cant give a waiver to the Constitution LOL
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:37 PM |
You can only amend it there is no waiver
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:37 PM |
| But if this was ### (Real Life) This Wouldnt let Jeff Session or Obama become President until they serve our their Tenures. They would have been forced to serve it out. Which also means a Congressmen couldn't become President or Vice president |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:38 PM |
lord im not changing my stances on this so quit trying
this is in there for a reason and its staying there
we arent making a constitutional amendment just so a select few can benefit and leave congress (leaving the people who voted for them w/ no representation) just for some position in executive branch
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:40 PM |
nay for obvious reasons
reserve constitutional amendments for when we really need it...not so some people can go off to eb lmao
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:43 PM |
since we can grant waivers to constitutional amendments now lets grant a waiver allowing for rapidaax to have seven vice presidents guys
or maybe even three presidents cuz why not who cares about the constitution if we can just waive it away
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:46 PM |
nay per the minority leader [2]
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:48 PM |
2 more nays to fail 12 more ayes to pass
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 25 Mar 2017 12:52 PM |
changed to abstain
ill beat u up 👊👊👊 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|