|
| 08 Feb 2017 12:32 PM |
I. Due to the unreliability of the federal SWAT this bill shall establish a municipal SWAT under the LVPD to be a permanent solution to these issues. NOTE: The LVPD SWAT will not replace the federal SWAT. (Im referring to it as LVPD SWAT to avoid any confusion)
II. The commander of the LVPD SWAT will be appointed by the Mayor with help/recommendations from the LVPD Sheriff/Chief.
III. The LVPD SWATCOM can be removed by order of the Mayor or the LVPD Chief and an LVCC vote.
IV. LVPD SWAT officers must also be employed within LVPD or they will be removed from the LVPD SWAT. SWAT officers will go through an acceptance process created by the Sheriff/Chief of LVPD.
V. The LVPD SWAT will be a emergency response force; they can be ordered to deploy by the LV Mayor and Deputy Mayor and the LVPD HICOMM
VI. The group shall be created by whoever the Mayor chooses; the ranks and permissions will be chosen by the Mayor.
VII. The LVPD SWAT shall receive the same tools as the federal SWAT.
Credit to Prozulous for the idea
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ruamaryn
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Jan 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1607 |
|
| |
|
Ruamaryn
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Jan 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1607 |
|
|
| 08 Feb 2017 01:34 PM |
Also this creates more local job opportunities which is always a plus in my book :)))))
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Prozulous
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 821 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Xasix
|
  |
| Joined: 16 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1073 |
|
|
| 08 Feb 2017 02:23 PM |
I urge you to Aye this as currently the LVPD Special Response Team is non-functional. The group should have at least the hicom in this order from lowest to highest:
Commander LVPD Sheriff Mayor Group Holder (paul)
Xasix | Zaz-ix |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
virginia
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Jun 2007 |
| Total Posts: 199 |
|
|
| 08 Feb 2017 02:34 PM |
aye, good idea (proz) thanks for bringing it up Youtube
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Feb 2017 02:54 PM |
| Aye, but congress will probably be angry. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
HershB
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Mar 2013 |
| Total Posts: 5361 |
|
|
| 08 Feb 2017 03:31 PM |
Aye, but I have one concern. I don't like the fact that the mayor can remove any commander with a single order, because this means future bias or brainless mayors can remove a commander because he wants to, not for the betterment of the city.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Craith
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Jan 2015 |
| Total Posts: 2022 |
|
|
| 08 Feb 2017 03:33 PM |
| Nay until bill is ammended to put LVPD SWAT solely under the command of the LVPD chief. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
T0bayas
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Nov 2015 |
| Total Posts: 192 |
|
| |
|
Kolibob
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2014 |
| Total Posts: 1046 |
|
|
| 09 Feb 2017 01:56 PM |
Put it under the Chief; period.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
kindve
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Oct 2014 |
| Total Posts: 1569 |
|
|
| 11 Feb 2017 07:29 PM |
| when i was in lvcc i made # bill not so similar to this but similar, it was to establish # lv swat that was only under supervision of lvpd, not under it i get the bill itself, but this really just seems like how MPD SWAT was ran under squareheaddude (it was bad). this bill just seems like its establishing # SWAT division under LVPD, but the only difference is that it has # team. if you want # local swat just establish # real local swat.. the lvpd chief can establish # division at any time but this is purely just giving it # team. not trash talking the bill i get and like the gist of it but i think it does not need to be fully under LVPD so we dont run into # MPD thing again. -kindve |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
kindve
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Oct 2014 |
| Total Posts: 1569 |
|
|
| 11 Feb 2017 07:34 PM |
| when i was in lvcc i made # bill not so similar to this but similar, it was to establish # lv swat that was only under supervision of lvpd, not under it i get the bill itself, but this really just seems like how MPD SWAT was ran under squareheaddude (it was bad). this bill just seems like its establishing # SWAT division under LVPD, but the only difference is that it has # team. if you want # local swat just establish # real local swat.. the lvpd chief can establish # division at any time but this is purely just giving it # team. not trash talking the bill i get and like the gist of it but i think it does not need to be fully under LVPD so we dont run into # MPD thing again. -kindve |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
lamg_567
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Jul 2014 |
| Total Posts: 257 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2017 08:33 PM |
e.e
Your friendly Koala -lamg_567 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Feb 2017 08:41 PM |
nooooo
I HAVE CHORTLES! ◕‿◕ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2017 10:29 AM |
| @kindve it would've ran well if SWAT Commander at ### time was actually compliant, they ruined it for everyone because they couldn't stay professional or contain themselves. care.exe has stopped working |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Feb 2017 12:47 PM |
*blames it on "current SWATCOM at the time"* (me)
>never let me do anything for SWAT so it was literally a dictatorship
I'm not the one who ruined it sorry
idk if i read those posts right but it seemssss as if someone *cough* is trying to pin something on me again
I HAVE CHORTLES! ◕‿◕ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|