|
| 21 Jan 2017 09:35 PM |
1.) SF 2.) VOID 3.) FC 4.) RAT 5.) VAK
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Laedere
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 23601 |
|
| |
|
Zerkius
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2015 |
| Total Posts: 3233 |
|
| |
|
Laedere
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 23601 |
|
|
| 21 Jan 2017 09:36 PM |
| Shouldn't FC be #1 considering they won against SF 9-0? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
espressos
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2011 |
| Total Posts: 17628 |
|
|
| 21 Jan 2017 09:36 PM |
It is a clan, it's a group that can be primaried right?
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Jan 2017 09:36 PM |
| ## ### ## ### ## ### ## ### ## ### |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zerkius
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2015 |
| Total Posts: 3233 |
|
|
| 21 Jan 2017 09:37 PM |
SF is just a hype clan.
In terms of actual clans, VAK still remains #1 because of how long they've lasted.
VOID and SF shouldn't be on this list, they've both shut down lots of times. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
espressos
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2011 |
| Total Posts: 17628 |
|
|
| 21 Jan 2017 09:38 PM |
| If you still rate clans or groups based on how long they've "existed" over their combat prowess and the community and its closeness, then ###### ####### at war clans |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Jan 2017 09:39 PM |
1.) SF Comes back once every few months to war VAK, and then precedes to shutdown again when they can't. Doesn't count.
2.) VOID Has done nothing relevant in the better part of a year, and when they raided TRA they got smacked. They come back to war VAK, and they shutdown again. Same as SF. Doesn't count.
3.) FC Has practically been invisible in clans for awhile. Although I admit they've got a great community I rarely see them raid, and have no idea how much they rally. So, this is a no.
4.) RAT Active and consistent. Can rally enough to raid at any time of day. Great community all around. Should be higher if anything.
5.) VAK Consistently active and is an offensive powerhouse in clans. Maybe if people would stop making a big deal and targeting them constantly and/or declining their wars they could prove it.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zerkius
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2015 |
| Total Posts: 3233 |
|
|
| 21 Jan 2017 09:39 PM |
| You can't base how good the clan itself is off of skill. Any clan can get the top gun fighters in their group. But it's how the clan is actually led. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zerkius
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2015 |
| Total Posts: 3233 |
|
| |
|
Laedere
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 23601 |
|
|
| 21 Jan 2017 09:40 PM |
"You can't base how good the clan itself is off of skill. Any clan can get the top gun fighters in their group. But it's how the clan is actually led."
Yes, but if you judge it like that, it's objectively a LOT more opinion based than the current system that's accepted. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zerkius
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2015 |
| Total Posts: 3233 |
|
|
| 21 Jan 2017 09:40 PM |
| There is more to a clan than it's skill level. For example, VAK has a much more stable community and member base than SF. VAK's members are actually loyal while SF's members just joined for the hype and the clan itself will shut down in a couple months. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zerkius
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2015 |
| Total Posts: 3233 |
|
|
| 21 Jan 2017 09:42 PM |
| Being a clan isn't all about being the best skill wise. It's a really inefficient way of rating a clan because hype clans would obviously get #1, like SF in this list. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zerkius
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2015 |
| Total Posts: 3233 |
|
|
| 21 Jan 2017 09:43 PM |
| It's the clans who haven't shut down and are still here that should be on the top lists. Not the hype clans with unloyal members. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 22 Jan 2017 01:47 AM |
| VAK is #1 SF VOID and FC shouldn't be on that list imo |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|