|
| 13 Jan 2017 11:34 AM |
I think that the removal of tickets were probably for the best. They were practically worthless and only caused inflation.
However, I feel like there should be a second currency that's free. But not like Tickets where it would give you twenty tickets just for logging on or something like that. One just for places.
After tickets were removed, there was a lack of a currency that gave you money to have people visit your place. Developers started making more IAPs and/or making them cost more because of DevEx. So, maybe we could help the developers while not bringing tickets all the way back.
Here's how it would work: You get one of these "dev points" for every hour your place is played. Also have trade currency available again so that you can trade these for ROBUX for use with DevEx.
Only having them under these conditions should reduce the inflation that we saw before in tickets. The reason tickets were so messed up is because they were given out way too easy, but this might be a way to circumvent that.
Papa bless |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Trancion
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2016 |
| Total Posts: 5923 |
|
| |
|
Sublivion
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 2390 |
|
| |
|
Sublivion
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 2390 |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2017 11:56 AM |
Also, the removal of tickets really doesn't have much affect on legitimate developers and traders.
Source: My income :)
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2017 11:58 AM |
No it isn't, I'm not asking them to roll back an update. I'm asking them to add something in that is similar to the update that they rolled back, but not really the same.
Papa bless |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sublivion
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 2390 |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2017 12:00 PM |
"I'm not asking them to roll back an update"
"*Adding back in a* *ticket*-like currency"
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2017 12:00 PM |
"ticket-like"
Adding back was a poor choice of words
Papa bless |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2017 12:01 PM |
Wouldn't it be easier to just give out robux for visits? Say 50 visits= 1 R$?
Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sublivion
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 2390 |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2017 12:03 PM |
Visits don't mean anything. They're just a number that is easily exploited and is only used for arrogance.
There really isn't much point as its only a small part of our income and now that group games have come along it would be way more exploitable and complex.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2017 12:12 PM |
I suppose so, hedikkeneemappelsap. Probably be better since it would also be a direct DevEx transfer. But I do feel like it should be based on hours played and not visits since it'd be harder to exploit.
Papa bless |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sublivion
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 2390 |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2017 12:14 PM |
More like easier.
*Opens up 10000 virtual clients and keeps them on the game for ages*
Also exploiting it wouldn't be beneficial to profit, they do that to get their games on the recomended page. Seriously though, it's only a small difference.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2017 12:16 PM |
Doesn't ROBLOX make you auto AFK after a little while?
Papa bless |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sublivion
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 2390 |
|
|
| 13 Jan 2017 12:25 PM |
There's something called bots..
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Jan 2017 12:34 PM |
That's true. But I still feel like someone exploiting place visits is more likely than someone making a bunch of different accounts to play for hours at a time.
Papa bless |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|