|
| 27 Dec 2016 07:27 AM |
Like, imagine getting 5-6 offers a day which are considerable in comparison to the value of an item.
That obviously concurs the item has a good enough demand, which is suitable for confirming that the item isn't garbage.
I feel that people just use this, "this item is garbage; but I'm going to send you a trade anyway 'cause I want it," excuse in order to get an item for less than they know it's worth.
People keep telling me, STF can't get 170k demand, then they offer 160-165k demand, or 170k trash demand.
(we all know, or we should all know, that the drop of stfs prices was due to pged accounts and the wealthier robloxians wanting the different colored stfs, but this never killed demand, people just wanted other colors. It's kind of like CWHP and CW's but the CW's just never built demand)
What I get from this is that people want to get an item for less than its worth by making the owners and consumers believe that the item is bad. Of course with an item like STF which actually has demand, it's working in their favor.
Name one person who didn't dream about owning an STF before they broke 100-200k?
^that is rhetorical, it's meant to draw a comparison to the amount of people who do and the mediocre amount of people who don't.
tl;dr: stop making items seem bad when they are proven to not be bad. People love to think they know why an item has a certain rep, then go along with the flow.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Dec 2016 07:27 AM |
| but i dont hav item that means its bad |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Dec 2016 07:30 AM |
@armadillo
That's basically the mindset of most people; the reason why some biases are actually not.. bias. It's actually just the owners saying they don't want to give an item for a certain amount because they believe it's worth more.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Woodfalls
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Jul 2016 |
| Total Posts: 5459 |
|
|
| 27 Dec 2016 07:31 AM |
| I think the people you're talking about may be trying to shark |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Dec 2016 07:32 AM |
| i think the original is one of the best,below purple red and green,all others are garbage |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Dec 2016 07:36 AM |
@wood
No, It's honestly anyone who wants to win. They see that certain people say something about a certain item, usually something with good demand and high value, then they go with the flow.
Examples of these could be:
AoTF; a pretty nice looking item, but gets bad rep for???
STF; an item with amazing demand yet it's garbage???
ghostdeeri; and item that was voted to be a limited by a large portion of the community, yet it's called garbage hourly..
euro; was an item with alot of demand, then got slack for being a "swimcap" and dropped value and demand.
rs; this is more of a past thing, dotf and rs had alot of slack, being called low demand and trash, didnt work really in the end though, both items are still worth a lot!
dotf; ^
ff; alot of people like ff but don't trade for it because they are scared of the bad rep it has.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Dec 2016 07:37 AM |
@armadillo
When I first joined my dream items were:
Valk STF GBTH FF CoW
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Collabs
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Dec 2014 |
| Total Posts: 3068 |
|
| |
|
Pyromis
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Aug 2015 |
| Total Posts: 7135 |
|
|
| 27 Dec 2016 07:40 AM |
hopefully that trade will shush you
db = 40k
kotsa = 65k
bulb = 7k
jj = 60k
I hate the new Kanye, the always rude Kanye. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Dec 2016 07:41 AM |
o mi
db = 35k really bad downgrade offers kotsa = 60-65 wut bulb?? jj = 60
120+35(maximum)
155-160k max + ??? wut bulb??
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Dec 2016 07:43 AM |
@pyro
This is exactly what gets me angry. You sent a terrible offer because you think someone would be conflicted enough to accept it.
In fact, most stf owners aren't taking 170k unless its demand.
When you can find an owner who is willing to take 170 bad demand, then you're lucky.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Pyromis
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Aug 2015 |
| Total Posts: 7135 |
|
|
| 27 Dec 2016 07:44 AM |
i can op more in a diff trade?
only bad demand is kotsa
db is ok
I hate the new Kanye, the always rude Kanye. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Pyromis
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Aug 2015 |
| Total Posts: 7135 |
|
|
| 27 Dec 2016 07:49 AM |
would u liek that?
I hate the new Kanye, the always rude Kanye. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 27 Dec 2016 07:51 AM |
Its all a mind game
-The Wize Wizzard Haz Spoken |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
AntVenomn
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 7471 |
|
|
| 27 Dec 2016 07:55 AM |
| A item is trash if it gets lower offers than what it's valued at |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Dec 2016 08:10 AM |
@ant
The problem I'm addressing is the confusion and misguidance of wealthier traders.
No one can deny the demand on almost any STF, yet we still have people saying it has no demand and its garbage.
Another problem with this era of trading is that there are no decent items in the 80-140k range like there was in 2014.
Most people own cwhp, prank, ff, yum, void.
Other than that, there are no decent items.
Before we had: Vesp, AC, RDC, WWA, EoTF, BSF(More like 60)
and we also had more 15-40k items, like way more:
cf, di, dual venom, dual darkhearts, jj, musicas, cwhp, cws(until it hit 50k+), db, ozzys,yum, prank, kotsa, dc, dhop(was like 11-12k, terrible demand), rf, sinister
Then we had our demand items:
valk = 6k, legit = 3.5k, w's = 11k, desert scout = 9k?, and bunches more
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Dec 2016 08:11 AM |
I think the inflation of item values killed the demand and what people offer.
Like, CWHP was 35 great demand, and because people could afford it, it got 40k offers.
Now its 90 but gets 85k offers.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|