Kiroll
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 9285 |
|
|
| 08 Dec 2016 03:48 PM |
be in charge of an extremely active clan that was super bad at raiding and always lost
or be in charge of an extremely inactive clan that was super good at raiding and always won |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ayreh
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1457 |
|
| |
|
|
| 08 Dec 2016 03:49 PM |
| Active because activity is funner and skill can be improved |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Dec 2016 03:50 PM |
| neither i want a huge clan where everyone is active and realizes i am the only one who can run the place |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Kiroll
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 9285 |
|
|
| 08 Dec 2016 03:50 PM |
@ayreh irrelevant noob
@dystra true |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Dec 2016 03:52 PM |
active
quantity > quality (just look at ww2 east front)
Worshipper of Chin-chin. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Dynerov
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Jul 2014 |
| Total Posts: 14682 |
|
|
| 08 Dec 2016 03:53 PM |
The extremely active.
For who needs to be good at raiding when you can be good at defense? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Dec 2016 03:57 PM |
Is the active clan bad at defending too?
And is the inactive clan a rich history type of clan that people used to look up to or just good and won most of their raids?
eh |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|