|
| 03 Dec 2016 03:13 PM |
1. leave the democracy/voting concept completely
a. it is quite corrupt that people can simply vote on people, in communities in lmad when most know each other closely and there is a lot of dirty rivalries as well as the votes being quite small can make it a lot more unfair. b. you can probably get better members simply by picking them by yourself, only use voting when nessecary but not between all of lmad and simply the legitimates group.
2. wipe the group, keep members that you can confirm as 100% legit
a. a lot of the people in the group were people from the old system so it would be good to wipe it to avoid any corruption and to get better middlemen b. it won't create that many eternal problems considering that you should keep a couple of people who can mm deals and hold items.
3. have higher and lower tiers of legitimates
a. people who cannot be verified and you may or may not trust could be put in a lower rank in order to make sure that people would focus more on the people who are more legit b. this encourages members of the legitimates to be legit and climb their way up
4. application based system
a. this helps with more and more people trying to get in, by doing so you can judge them by their higher and lower tier. b. this also ties in with (3.) because if you don't trust them as much you can simply put them in a lower tier, say that they do 5 deals or so that were pretty well known and big, they would get promoted.
all the ideas i have for now, i might make more in the future tho
sent these to him, opinions?
call me adam |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 03 Dec 2016 03:15 PM |
I have a better idea Abandon the group because it's pretty much based on bias and the talk on lmad so what's the point? Just have a lmad log area for everything that happens illegit and legit |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Dec 2016 03:15 PM |
also any ideas?
call me adam |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Dec 2016 03:15 PM |
@golden_flame
this post are all good ideas to resolve that issue however
call me adam |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Dec 2016 03:16 PM |
"have higher and lower tiers of legitimates
a. people who cannot be verified and you may or may not trust could be put in a lower rank in order to make sure that people would focus more on the people who are more legit b. this encourages members of the legitimates to be legit and climb their way up"
Drowsy has a scam refund implemented. He can't afford doing that, and it is not bright as then the group will have a lot of potential scammers in it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
vaporeon
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Mar 2007 |
| Total Posts: 1109 |
|
|
| 03 Dec 2016 03:16 PM |
At this point, I think the entire concept of the legitimates is kinda silly.
This could all be solved with roblox adding just two more trading slots. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Dec 2016 03:17 PM |
any other ideas/opninions
call me adam |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Dec 2016 03:19 PM |
@teholdblue
this keeps on with the idea of actually letting 100% legitimate people in
@vaporeon
how long will we have to wait for that, though?
call me adam |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Dec 2016 03:20 PM |
also, alwaysdrowsy had a post saying "creating new instutions for the legitimates" or something like that
call me adam |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Dec 2016 03:55 PM |
It said instituting a new voting system.
That does not mean that I am creating new institutions.
I just want to help people. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Dec 2016 03:56 PM |
in this thread i state that voting should only be done between the legitimates and only on several occasions, that should be enough for creating new institutions for the voting system
call me adam |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Y_0
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 26518 |
|
|
| 03 Dec 2016 03:57 PM |
3. have higher and lower tiers of legitimates
a. people who cannot be verified and you may or may not trust could be put in a lower rank in order to make sure that people would focus more on the people who are more legit b. this encourages members of the legitimates to be legit and climb their way up
They shouldnt be in the group if they arent 100% legit
-Ƴ_0⠀ (∩ ͡⎚ل͜ ͡⎚)⊃━☆゚.* |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Dec 2016 03:59 PM |
@y_0
this rank isn't for people who aren't 100% legit, it is for more new people in the group that you aren't so sure of their legitimacy, it is mainly to give priority to the more well known middlemen
call me adam |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|