Civak
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 15182 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:44 PM |
to my knowledge they removed the acc sharing rule for some reason that had to do with development or something idk haven't read the tos in... never
but idk what your points are either you guys played scummy and joined games on his acc to crash him then banned him when he came back on a diff acc and got mohxy in, giving us one less raider and you one more defender
and just at our last raid a raider got randomly crashed while we were winning and mohxy got in right away almost as if it was planned like the banning of avi
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
noVillain
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3451 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:45 PM |
ah yes, only a csp member has access to his account
CSP is at fault here!
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:45 PM |
1-0 csp favor
sometimes ur clan is so bad that even when ur given all advantages, u lose :/
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
outpay
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 11620 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:46 PM |
"you guys played scummy and joined games on his acc to crash him"
*looks through the three pages of posts for proof*
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:46 PM |
"but idk what your points are either you guys played scummy and joined games on his acc to crash him"
Civak get me solid evidence
and a NAME
And I'll give you the win personally.
Until then this war stays 1-0.
CSP OP | +2,435 posts. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Civak
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 15182 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:47 PM |
"and if the script was working, he wouldn't be able to get in the raid
whats your argument"
you know what man you're totally right I have no argument because a CSP member going on his acc and crashing him is perfectly fine then banning him to get mohxy in is also perfectly fine
and our members randomly getting crashed while we're winning and mohxy getting in RIGHT AWAY, I kid you not, I M M E D I A T E L Y
it's more than just a coincidence that mohxy started his pend when someone leaves a server it shows them as still in it for another second or two no way you expect me to believe that's just luck when it's happened more than once lol
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Xavez
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Jun 2012 |
| Total Posts: 735 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:47 PM |
"to my knowledge they removed the acc sharing rule for some reason that had to do with development or something idk haven't read the tos in... never
but idk what your points are either you guys played scummy and joined games on his acc to crash him then banned him when he came back on a diff acc and got mohxy in, giving us one less raider and you one more defender
and just at our last raid a raider got randomly crashed while we were winning and mohxy got in right away almost as if it was planned like the banning of avi "
------------------------------------------
He wasn't even in ISA at the time, he wasn't supposed to get in. No, don't even give me that excuse about "Well it's your fault for not having it fixed" you enforced the 9v11 mandatory rule even while your raider limit script was broken. You also don't even give proof, I mean suggesting the idea is alright, but going full out saying that it happened without proof, I don't even know man. Mohxy also probably got in since he was constantly refreshing the server page. I also believe it's possible they figured out that Aviation was not in ISA almost at the very end or did something, could be both or either.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Rjkelpiee
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 8557 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:47 PM |
| Civak if so it's still not considered a raid win according to war terms. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:48 PM |
And a tip, you shouldn't have people who you know account share raid with you.
Just saying :/
CSP OP | +2,435 posts. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
noVillain
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3451 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:48 PM |
ah yes, only csp member[s] have access to his account
CSP is at fault here! [2]
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Civak
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 15182 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:48 PM |
like I said my dude wait for avi to get on and tell you the name I don't even remember who he said it was lol I'm not going to say a random dude just to satisfy you
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
noVillain
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3451 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:49 PM |
also, provide proof of it
words don't get you wins my dude!
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:50 PM |
We always have people on standby to pend, mohxy probably saw the opening in the server and joined.
I see when people leave instantly idk about you though ;/
CSP OP | +2,435 posts. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Civak
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 15182 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:50 PM |
"you enforced the 9v11 mandatory rule even while your raider limit script was broken."
you still have the win from when our raider limit was broken you had more than 11 raiders in it during the raid, I don't care how many it shows in the screenshot for the win lol
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Civak
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 15182 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:52 PM |
"We always have people on standby to pend, mohxy probably saw the opening in the server and joined.
I see when people leave instantly idk about you though ;/"
in the server list it doesn't show it instantly and yeah I get that mohxy COULD have saw it and joined but mohxy being the one to get in everytime one of our guys randomly gets crashed???
and onmy you're not stupid don't even try and tell me that you guys didn't plan to ban avi and have mohxy join immediately to give you a number advantage, while we were winning
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Xavez
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Jun 2012 |
| Total Posts: 735 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:52 PM |
Logically, if what you said was true (I wasn't even at that raid)
Our raid win should not be invalidated because one officer (Yeah, an admin is required to start a raid at Vekta City, idk if he stayed though) failed to enforce terms that benefited ISA until the very end even after the scripts were broken.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:52 PM |
No one even know about the rule that "The raid has to stay a 9v11"
Till after we started to win when it got to 8v12
No one said a single thing during the first raid, or I would have probably dismissed one.
You had officers in the defense and I'm sure they were on TS3 why was nothing said then?
CSP OP | +2,435 posts. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
noVillain
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3451 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:54 PM |
i hope you know mohxy is always on standby when we defend AND raid when he isn't in the server
him getting in both times isn't valid proof lol
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Rjkelpiee
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 8557 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:54 PM |
[[ If there is a certain high rank that is abusing his admin, his admin will need to be removed.. For example, banning or kicking raiders for absolutely no reason will be considered admin abuse Admin Abusing is defined as any individual with administrative powers using admin other than :logs :h and :m (unless excessive) against the other raid commanders permission, or without a legitimate reason. ]]
If he did get kicked for whatever reason you believe the most that could happen is someones admin getting removed. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:54 PM |
Mohxy was probably the only one pending, we have our defenses very organized and we ALWAYS have a set defense squad.
No one would have been looking for a server space to open up except mohxy at that moment then
CSP OP | +2,435 posts. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:56 PM |
You can always come see logs, logs save from server to server (if you're thinking we crashed him)
i can assure you nobody was crashed, i was able to join because nbk told me one raider left so i joined quickly, pending is broke so the first person to pend when someone leaves, gets in |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Civak
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 15182 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:57 PM |
"No one even know about the rule that "The raid has to stay a 9v11"
Till after we started to win when it got to 8v12
No one said a single thing during the first raid, or I would have probably dismissed one.
You had officers in the defense and I'm sure they were on TS3 why was nothing said then?"
fatalcolt was the officer who officialized it to my knowledge and he had no idea that there even was a raider limit script at the time because it wasn't even working your war procedure said that you would have one and that we could too we did, it just didn't function properly on the first day and we realized that after the first 2-3 defenses I could've updated Vekta City immediately but I needed NBK or Mohxy to watch as I fixed it so they couldn't claim that I changed anything else For the rest of the first day I had my officers force you guys to dismiss if you went over the raider limit until I could get nbk or mohxy to watch me fix it
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:58 PM |
Civak look we're friends I know you're a decently level headed guy.
I know you honestly don't believe that we had someone go on Avis account to crash him
CSP OP | +2,435 posts. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Xavez
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Jun 2012 |
| Total Posts: 735 |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 11:59 PM |
Then it isn't our fault FatalColt was uninformed.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Sep 2016 12:01 AM |
| And if that was actually what happened and you have solid evidence, the real question is ### ### #### does Avi let people have access to his account when he owns a clan? ### OP | +2,435 posts. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|