|
| 24 Sep 2016 09:16 AM |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32mxZxv3dYM
Just the beginning blows my mind. She thinks that just because single-celled organisms exist now and existed about 4 billion years ago, that means they've never changed. A lot can change in a single-celled organism. For example, many of those single-celled organisms became parasitic bacteria when they needed more nutrients to survive. It's doubtful that they were ever that way during the first moments of life on Earth because there was really nothing to feed on other than other single-celled organisms. Some viruses and bacteria do prey on other bacteria and viruses, but they've still adapted to feed off of more complex organisms. I'll let you experience the rest for yourself, but prepare yourself for a world of hurt.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| 24 Sep 2016 09:24 AM |
And I just love how she bases her whole arguments off of us having to DIRECTLY observe something in order to prove it. As anyone with 5% of a brain knows, you don't have to see something to believe it, you only need to see its remains and influences. We know when soils formed because of huge canyons with exposed rock layers, and we know how old those rocks are due to various radiometric dating techniques.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|