Vidkun
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 10381 |
|
| |
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 03:41 AM |
| Not when you own a VK 72.01k |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
55Altair
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Oct 2008 |
| Total Posts: 6272 |
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 03:41 AM |
| Maybe if you don't pay anything it is |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 03:50 AM |
calling it an esport to make yourself not look as fat
siggy |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 03:51 AM |
world of tanks is pay to win without strategy.
paper tanks, paper guns, paper shells. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Vidkun
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 10381 |
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 03:55 AM |
| how is world of tanks pay to win please elaborate |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 03:59 AM |
- premium tanks have better matchmaking and do not face as high tiers as non premium tanks
- the best performing shells must be bought out of your own money
- intense grind. get premium or spend a few months to get your next tank
- 100% crew can be bought, lots of upgrades there
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:01 AM |
how does this have anything to do with c7g you irrelevant little sh-
#code print 'bellaz is a guy' |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:14 AM |
| Or you can be good and never spend a dime because of clans |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Vidkun
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 10381 |
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:25 AM |
ok im gonna debunk all ur points there pal
- premium tanks have better matchmaking and do not face as high tiers as non premium tanks there are only a couple of premium matchmaking tanks. the existing ones are not able to be bought and are usually rewarded by good sportsmanship and skills
- the best performing shells must be bought out of your own money you can buy them for more credits (which you earn in battle and cant buy)
- intense grind. get premium or spend a few months to get your next tank not really. once you actually start performing well getting to tier VII is easy (you shouldnt get to tier VIII quickly because that would make it really hard to have decent games)
- 100% crew can be bought, lots of upgrades there 100% crew can be bought for 300 gold which is pretty steep and nobody really does that. i usually train my crew in a premium tank (which trains them faster but doesnt mean the tank is OP)
this is how premium tanks work
better than stock, but worse than their fully upgraded counterparts
for example the ## No. VI (Japanese Tiger) is the Tiger I but with the L/56 instead of the L/71 so it has worse ########### |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:31 AM |
- premium tanks have better matchmaking and do not face as high tiers as non premium tanks there are only a couple of premium matchmaking tanks. the existing ones are not able to be bought and are usually rewarded by good sportsmanship and skills
fair point but they still exist, which they shouldn't.
- the best performing shells must be bought out of your own money you can buy them for more credits (which you earn in battle and cant buy)
for a lot of credits. far too expensive to run a tank on premium shells from money you earn in battle. there's also historical problems here. tanks aren't firing the right rounds and therefore doing far too little damage. a conqueror firing heat? good one.
- intense grind. get premium or spend a few months to get your next tank not really. once you actually start performing well getting to tier VII is easy (you shouldnt get to tier VIII quickly because that would make it really hard to have decent games)
for one player, that is. someone might only get 1000 research points a day and you might get ten times that.
- 100% crew can be bought, lots of upgrades there 100% crew can be bought for 300 gold which is pretty steep and nobody really does that. i usually train my crew in a premium tank (which trains them faster but doesnt mean the tank is OP)
so you've bought a tank to get a better crew? and it isn't p2w?
this is how premium tanks work
better than stock, but worse than their fully upgraded counterparts
for example the ## No. VI (Japanese Tiger) is the Tiger I but with the L/56 instead of the L/71 so it has worse pen
the l/71 is the long eighty-eight which was used on the tiger ii, not the tiger i. the tiger i used the l/56. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Vidkun
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 10381 |
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:34 AM |
| The L/71 is able to be mounted on the Tiger I in WoT for balancing reasons (French heavy tanks have ridiculous pen but no armor) The Tiger II can mount the L/71 but that's the stock gun. You can mount a 128mm long barrel'd gun on it. The premium tanks exist for crew training and easier credit earning to #### ### ###### easier. They force you to actually do good in games to actually get the ability to use gold to transfer experience to make grinds quicker. Premium tanks aren't OP, they're just decent tanks that are designed to train crews that you can put into tanks of the same class and country. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:35 AM |
| Not all premium tanked help either. I have two tier ten prems and all the regular tier 10s. I still burn credits. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Vidkun
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 10381 |
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:36 AM |
If you only get 1000 exp a day, you're playing WoT >>>VERY<<< badly and doing an average of 0 damage a game.
Even if you do 0 damage you get at least 200-300 experience for random spotting or blocking damage.
So basically you'd have to play at least 20-30 minutes a day to earn 1000 experience per day. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:38 AM |
| One battle gets me 1-4K exp there's no way it'll take you a day unless you don't move all game and get artied asap |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:39 AM |
| i'm sorry what the tiger i could not historically mount the l/71. the l/71 is probably the size of the tiger i. i don't see how mounting a gun far more powerful with far better ########### is balance - then again, wot doesn't really care about shells or balance, for that matter. the tiger ii could not fit a 128mm. there's not even a proposed 128mm modification. there's a proposed 105mm modification, but fitting the pak 44 into a tiger ii? impossible. this game really does have some historical issues. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Vidkun
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 10381 |
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:42 AM |
| Still, at least the Russian bias isn't as bad lmao |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Vidkun
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 10381 |
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:43 AM |
| There was a proposed turret design to fit the L/71 on the Tiger I. Look it up pal. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:43 AM |
| russian bias isn't a thing. the commies complain about 'us bias' and 'german bias' all the same. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:43 AM |
| all these sub 1000 wn8s in this thread |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:45 AM |
| 1700 overall wn8 3500 recent screw off |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:46 AM |
| looking at the design now. modified /experimental/ tiger e. it's a paper tank. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Vidkun
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 10381 |
|
|
| 05 Sep 2016 04:48 AM |
What's wrong with paper tanks? They already said they don't try to be laser accurate historic.
It's fun to see these cool tanks that were planned put into action. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|