Zach1102
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 48576 |
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 03:47 PM |
I've defended and raided both forts and it's clear that they are too reliant on numbers. The SMGs deal horribly low damage meaning that if you have more people, you win and that's a fact.
Both forts have too many entrances and that makes it impossible to defend as both sides always end up with just 10 defenders and 15 raiders, meaning that raiders have a huge edge.
Throw in the faulty errors from day 1 and horrible spawning in the UAF fort and it truly is just another mess. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 03:48 PM |
10 v 15 is actually very fair
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zach1102
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 48576 |
|
| |
|
Arcarius
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Jul 2012 |
| Total Posts: 20844 |
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 03:49 PM |
chins..
Chancellor of the Federation |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 03:49 PM |
Actually it's pretty balanced and fair imo.
Also why're you trying to be relevant by bashing on something that is going to help the clan world?
https://www.roblox.com/My/Groups.aspx?gid=2867530 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
SUGERDEW
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8689 |
|
| |
|
Pectrial
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Apr 2014 |
| Total Posts: 3582 |
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 03:50 PM |
| Lol I defending successfully with less defenders twice what are you on. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
IArlongI
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Mar 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2499 |
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 03:51 PM |
Both forts are fair, as well as how it's setup.
Hi Abril |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Pectrial
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Apr 2014 |
| Total Posts: 3582 |
|
| |
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 03:59 PM |
| smg damaged should be raised |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 03:59 PM |
the war is going fine, idk what youre complaining about
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Pectrial
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Apr 2014 |
| Total Posts: 3582 |
|
| |
|
ncusa17
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 7049 |
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 04:17 PM |
only pissed about two things >fort fang lags out badly >60 second cap time is utter bs
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
B1900D
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Mar 2010 |
| Total Posts: 11295 |
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 04:19 PM |
your opinion doesnt mean anything
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 04:22 PM |
| Everyone complains about everything nowadays |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bahll
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8150 |
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 04:23 PM |
Better than redfor v bluefor
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 04:44 PM |
To be brutally honest I don't care if there are any problems that people have with this no matter the amount. I'm so happy and joyful to see clans being this active and actually being motivated to fight.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Hacted
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 9496 |
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 04:45 PM |
REDFOR vs BLUFOR actually forced people to defend and the groups involved weren't incredibly inactive at least..
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 04:49 PM |
Forced people to defend?
How? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zach1102
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 48576 |
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 04:53 PM |
| A rowar should be a huge climatic battle, just constantly rushing a quick capture terminal with more numbers. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 04:53 PM |
redfor vs blufor was 10 times better than this garbage of a ro-war
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ColossaI
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 945 |
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 04:53 PM |
Zach1102? More like CoolGuy1102.
i am the snorkel king |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Zach1102
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 48576 |
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 04:56 PM |
| That's even worse considering the low damage SMGs and many entrances to each fort. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 21 Aug 2016 04:58 PM |
low damage is better than high damage guns lol
guns should be 8-12 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|