|
| 07 Aug 2016 10:14 PM |
we measure time in days, hours, minutes, seconds, etc. Now, picture what the smallest measurement of time would be. It would make sense that it should be 0.00... with the 0 repeating and a one after infinite zeros, right? Shouldn't that be the most precise way to measure time?
Here's the problem: as time progresses, the measurement really wouldn't change, because this is dealing with infinity. Therefore, time has fixed increments, the "fps" of life isn't infinity, since you can't reach infinity. the same is true for the measurement of the 3 normal dimensions: width, height, and length.
now, using this logic, everything is basically a bunch of pixels, and there has to be some "rule" that determines where these pixels move every "step" in time. If you could observe the arrangement of every single "pixel" at one step, and then compare them to the next step, you could find this rule. Using this rule and the placement of pixels in the present, you could apply this rule to determine the future.
and that's how my car got totaled in the first place. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 10:17 PM |
| the 'fps' is how fast your brain can use the info from the light your eyes gather |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 10:20 PM |
this is based on simple human logic, so either this is right or human logic is wrong, either way, it's important.
But even with this knowledge, it would be really hard to do without super advanced technology, and you would have to take into account the cross-dimensional stuff like black holes.
and that's how my car got totaled in the first place. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 10:23 PM |
@super
just think of time as a book. every page represents and increment of time. If that increment is a century, it would be a rather short book. If that increment was the next number greater than 0, it would take infinite pages just to cover a millisecond in time. And if time is actually real, we know that we've been around longer than that.
and that's how my car got totaled in the first place. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 10:26 PM |
i think you are thinking way too hard about this time isnt a physical concept |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 10:29 PM |
height, width, and length are. They would have to work the same way.
and that's how my car got totaled in the first place. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 10:39 PM |
those are completely different things OP seriously, read over your reasons and not overthink about the two concepts and you will see why they are different one is time, a period when something happens and height width length is how big something is |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 10:43 PM |
According to Einstein, time is the 4th dimension, and regardless of whether that's true or not, the two things can relate because both can be measured.
and that's how my car got totaled in the first place. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 10:44 PM |
| however both are not measured by the same WAY |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
AluminumX
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 17997 |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 10:48 PM |
this thread is incorrect
there can be unlimited frames per second, but we will always be at a limitation due to how many we can actually process
frames per second just means how fluently you can view something, as when they're put together they move as one which shows motion
now the more frames with details you add, the more fluent it becomes
therefor, it could become infinity
IT'S DESPERATION! | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvheNuXxk_k |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
AluminumX
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 17997 |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 10:48 PM |
btw
frames is not measured by time
frames is just a picture
frames is limited by time though
IT'S DESPERATION! | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvheNuXxk_k |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 10:49 PM |
it would work the same way, both time and the 3 dimensions are measured with numbers, the fact that you can never reach infinity would apply to both.
and that's how my car got totaled in the first place. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
AluminumX
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 17997 |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 10:50 PM |
one last thing
i actually read this post now
saying time isn't infinity is still incorrect
1 second
0.1 second
0.01 second
0.001 second
i can keep going forever if i keep adding zeros, which is still technically time itself
IT'S DESPERATION! | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvheNuXxk_k |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
AluminumX
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 17997 |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 10:51 PM |
"it would work the same way, both time and the 3 dimensions are measured with numbers, the fact that you can never reach infinity would apply to both."
you can't reach infinity because it never stops
that's probably why
this isn't a major discovery at all
IT'S DESPERATION! | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvheNuXxk_k |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 10:52 PM |
STOP ITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
i like gluing myself on a tree | +2k posts |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 11:07 PM |
going back to my book example, if you're saying that time can be "infinite frames per second", and if every page was a "frame", and every second was a "chapter", you would have to read infinite pages to make it to chapter 2, and like you said, infinite never stops going, which means it would be impossible for time to progress if it was measured with that. if infinity represented a chapter, reading two chapters of time would basically be "two infinities", and anything + infinity is still infinity.
and that's how my car got totaled in the first place. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
AluminumX
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 17997 |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 11:42 PM |
This is still incorrect. Time never advances, we add a certain number of time together to advance. A second is literally 0.1 put together ten times. Time doesn't end, we add it up to advance though.
IT'S DESPERATION! | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oYU93-Kv_k |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
AluminumX
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 17997 |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2016 11:44 PM |
The book example is completely wrong as well, if you were to compare time with it.
Sixty pages in a chapter.
Sixty seconds in a minute.
You keep going and don't stop with seconds, it's until we hit 60 that we classify that group of seconds as a minute. In a book we go up to sixty pages and just call that a chapter. With books you build up to it, with time you break it down and classify it.
IT'S DESPERATION! | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oYU93-Kv_k |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|