|
| 02 Aug 2016 08:22 PM |
The Judiciary Committee has recently been reorganized and is in need of a new Chairman.
The Chairman shall only be chosen by members of the Majority party.
How to vote,
[X] Noob1234
Vote away!
(Voting closes in 18 hours or until a Majority of votes is reached)
Signed, Member of the committee on committee's
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 08:29 PM |
| I URGE ALL SENATORS TO PICK FEAREDVEXATION FOR SJC CHAIRMAN |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Saber516
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 725 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 08:33 PM |
| fearedvexation for SJC chariman |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Tigerism
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Aug 2015 |
| Total Posts: 561 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 08:40 PM |
Changing my party to the Democratic party.
My vote is: Tigerism
You need radical members as the Chairman, someone who isn't afraid to Nay a bad vote. Feared will just approve of every single nomination, good or bad.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 08:45 PM |
[X] FearedVexation
> Former Las Vegas District Attorney
> Former Assistant US Attorney
> Former Vice Chairman of the SJC
> Current Special Prosecutor appointed by Attorney General Qolio
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Tigerism
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Aug 2015 |
| Total Posts: 561 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 08:47 PM |
Feared has no idea what the SJC does, which is super ironic as the Vice Chairman. Multiple times he asked me "does the SJC actually do this" on the trello, it's like, you didn't research what the SJC does in the first place?
He's inactive unless you @mention him on the board, and he's a puppet; he'll approve anyone who comes in.
Person has no JB experience and wants to be SCJ? feared: aye
Person has no DoJ experience but wants to be AG? feared: aye
------
me: nay
See why I'm the better choice?
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 08:54 PM |
@tigerism Everyone has a lot of questions when they're first elected into something like Senate or a committee. If they had nothing at all as an experience I would nay but the people you're probably referring to have experience.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Tigerism
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Aug 2015 |
| Total Posts: 561 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 08:55 PM |
ok, so what experience does jacob have to be SCJ?
experience: law enforcement agencies
-----
that's it.
shouldn't he start as a fj first...???????????
and patrick:
exp: sc no doj exp
that means AG???
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Tigerism
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Aug 2015 |
| Total Posts: 561 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 08:56 PM |
+ you just tried arguing a few days ago that the SJC has no jurisdiction over resolutions that involve the judiciary lmao
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 09:03 PM |
> SecretlyJacob is a former Prosecutor and Supreme Court Justice one of the first appointed by night. He understands how the Supreme Court functions he doesn't have to be a Federal Judge. SC and FC are diffrent.
> Patrick has experiences in the Department of Justice in foreign countries I abstained on that vote.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 09:06 PM |
The resolution presented by Harvey did not directly effect the Judiciary. After all resolutions only effect House, Senate or both chambers of Congress.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Tigerism
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Aug 2015 |
| Total Posts: 561 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 09:07 PM |
want me to pull up screenshots of you admitting that you're a puppet for the democratic party in the SJC skype chat and was refusing to nay/abstain the vote until like 4 people were trying to convince you that he has no exp?
ooo other countries have the department of justice! thats not nusa, sorry
now with jacob:
um the first supreme court when night was potus was awful. they didnt know what they were doing tbh.. and wasnt that in 2013? 3 years ago? thats not recent wtf
+ i never saw any cases that he's prosecuted.. how many did he prosecute, 1?
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Tigerism
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Aug 2015 |
| Total Posts: 561 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 09:10 PM |
also the supreme court just did a motion a few days ago about the motion... here's an excerpt from the motion:
"WHEREAS according to the real Senate Judiciary Committee, they vote on various Resolutions that involve the Judiciary;
WHEREAS modifying the Senate Judiciary Committee undoubtedly involves the Judiciary;"
so even the sc agrees with me lmao
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 09:15 PM |
> I abstained check my twitter for the GIF i'm afraid Tigerism will report it like all other links he sees.
> He was still a Justice in the past but the SC did develop as the years went by but if a better candidate for the position was found I would support that person over him.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 09:17 PM |
That's the Justices opinion. (Synapsic)
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Tigerism
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Aug 2015 |
| Total Posts: 561 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 09:30 PM |
so.... because there's no better person nominated by sudden.. means that person should be approved?
WHAT KIND OF LOGIC IS THAT LOL!
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Tigerism
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Aug 2015 |
| Total Posts: 561 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 09:40 PM |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwPCAfOhJCE&feature=youtu.be
that video shows who feared really is!!!
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 09:41 PM |
@tigerism He's fit for the position but if presented with a better option I would go with that.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Tigerism
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Aug 2015 |
| Total Posts: 561 |
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 09:45 PM |
so u mean like a puppet, right??
lmao you're basically saying you'll approve anyone sudden nominates because there's no other candidates
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 09:46 PM |
"He's fit for the positon"
"but if there is a better option I would go with that"
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 09:53 PM |
I endorse Mefus to be the SJC chairman. I encourage you all to vote for him.
-The Hon. AnimatedDannyo, Associate Justice
ᗩᘉᓰᗰᗩ☂ᕮↁᗪᗩᘉᘉϒ〇 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Aug 2016 09:56 PM |
Sure I love Mefus but he has no legal experience whatsoever. If you compared both of us in the legal field I would be above the roof.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|