disn1245
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1208 |
|
|
| 14 Jul 2016 10:33 AM |
Vehicle Removal Act Written by Representative Disn1245
Section I: A major problem facing American city-goers is lag; lag caused by unwanted and abandoned vehicles lying all over American cities. However, when a citizen attempts to remove a vehicle, through conducting arson upon it or driving it over the edge of the map, they can be legally arrested. This act wishes to fix this.
Section II: If passed, it will legal to remove a vehicle through the following forms: conducting arson upon it (if vehicle is in a city where arson is possible) and driving it over the edge of the map (if vehicle is in a city where there is an edge of the map). Any law enforcement who arrests citizen for removing a vehicle through the forms listed above can be arrested and punished for 28 U.S. Code 2680 (false imprisonment).
Section III: Any legislation in conflict with this act is hereby declared null and void.
Signed, Disn1245 Representative |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
devTools
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Sep 2014 |
| Total Posts: 7950 |
|
|
| 14 Jul 2016 10:40 AM |
Or we can ask the devs to automatically remove vehicles if 1) The owner of the vehicle spawns a new one 2) The vehicle hasn't been used in over 5 minutes 3) The owner leaves the server
Signed, devTools NSA Deputy Director |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
goleros
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 561 |
|
|
| 14 Jul 2016 02:55 PM |
what if the citizen is actually GTAing a car? There would be no proof that they intend to drive it off the edge.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Jul 2016 04:42 PM |
WHAT? First off, you realise you can get in the driver's seat, spawn a new car, and the other one will disappear, right? This is highly unneeded. Second off, encouraging the explosion of cars puts the public in danger!
Finally, what the hell is the last clause? Charing the police officers for "28 U.S. Code 2680 (false imprisonment)"?????? Um, that's NOT A CHARGE. You people who don't know anything about law really need to stop messing with law. Title 28 is judicial procedure; nothing in there is a crime. Second off, what the hell does 28 U.S. Code 2680 have to do with false imprisonment? There is NOTHING in that statute that has anything to do with that crime.
This is useless, stupid, and will have major negative effects. Don't pass this garbage.
-The Honorable, Federal Judge AnimatedDannyo
ᗩᘉᓰᗰᗩ☂ᕮↁᗪᗩᘉᘉϒ〇 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mefus
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Sep 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1138 |
|
| |
|
Benda587
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 354 |
|
|
| 14 Jul 2016 09:09 PM |
| First off let me just start by quoting you: "If passed, it will legal to remove a vehicle through the following forms." Read over that sentence and tell me what is wrong with it; secondly 28 U.S. Code 2680 applies to tort claims and that is not even a charge, just a list of exceptions that would make it impossible for a civilian to file a tort claim against the government. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|