|
| 08 Jul 2016 07:11 AM |
It has came to my attention that the valuing system of trading has became non-logical for me, myself and I.
Although I know the value of most items and most of the time I get what I say for an item, it seems that there has been a slight complication for not only myself but for others who may or may not be reading this.
So to start off I'm going to mention the difference between Dark Conjurer and JJ 5x5 Top hat. Now I have owned both of these, therefore I now understand that JJ should beat Dark Conjurer. People say JJ is 50k and DC is 55k, this as an example is non-logical; this is because the JJ top hat has more rap than DC, therefore JJ > DC in my point of view. (waiting for the hate) Further into this example, I believe that any item with more rap than another item should have more value too. Personally I believe that in order to gain the value, you must use the rap within a calculation.
My calculation method might seem stupid, but for most items value it works. The calculation is basic. So using Classic Fedora as an example, you would double the rap which would come to the answer of 60,000? ish. After doing this you would find the number between 30,000 and 60,000, which is 45,000. This sums up as the value as many people already say its 45,000.
Now I ideally want to fix the system by having enough supporters as it in my eyes have became a slight issue because so many people continue to misunderstand and low ball me and several others. (Raise your hand) Not only this, people tend to argue from people devaluing an item. Just another example for non logical value is I have had Blizzard Beast Mode several times, and personally I believe the value is 8,000 at max. Due to the calculation, the value would be round 7,500 to 8,000, however many people misunderstand and think it worth 6,000 to 7,000.
What im trying to get supported with for those who still don't know is that: Lets make all items which has more rap mean it wins in value against other items, such as the DC and JJ example. Another thing is (unlikely) but the calculation method I use. Whether you think its stupid or sounds like a reasonable idea. Support or hate.
Thanks.
It is I, the one and only, Sir O'Lord O'Doctor Professor Vetagos |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
WavyBank
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2016 |
| Total Posts: 2474 |
|
|
| 08 Jul 2016 07:13 AM |
last line made me cringe
but dc is 50 anyways |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jul 2016 07:17 AM |
Which last line? xD
It is I, the one and only, Sir O'Lord O'Doctor Professor Vetagos |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WavyBank
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jun 2016 |
| Total Posts: 2474 |
|
| |
|
|
| 08 Jul 2016 07:27 AM |
i don't support this l0l
157,452 | R$5,343| Goal 305k value at the end of July. | +30k+ value on alt |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jul 2016 07:27 AM |
xD its windy today
It is I, the one and only, Sir O'Lord O'Doctor Professor Vetagos |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jul 2016 11:45 AM |
True, true.
Smartalek22, Hater of SLPM Puts [X] Chancellor for gallantry on my resume to annoy him. (but serious, I did better than him at Chancellor Veta could tell you that) Probably the best trader (2K to 5K come on!) Have had many previous roles Can do front flip with no trampoline (no honestly) SLPM ruined Hirdsenian empire Traded with shedletsky (who hasn't) Met creator of fun minigames (so easy) And he said "Hi :D" to me (" came out as @ annoying american keyboard) And brother and frienship goals with hannavas04 Thx BAIII Oh an Founder of a Group
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
AzureAres
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 7280 |
|
| |
|
|
| 08 Jul 2016 03:00 PM |
Azure, thats why I want this forum to be supported so that the system would be more logical.
It is I, the one and only, Sir O'Lord O'Doctor Professor Vetagos |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|