Technozo
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 4086 |
|
|
| 18 May 2016 06:31 PM |
NUSA Judicial Check Act
WHEREAS The Judicial Branch has been the fuel of Congressional impeachments
WHEREAS Judicial inactivity has made it difficult for people to get fair Justice served
RESOLVED Section 1(a): Established is a new trello called the United States Judicial Branch trello. (b) All judicial activity from individual judges will be stored in different lists. (c) Under this act it would be a crime for Judges who are not on leave to not submit at least one piece of Judicial activity to the board. (d) On leave is defined as vacation announced via shout, official chat room, or official DoJ or JB trellos. Judicial activity is defined as anything that has to do with helping out with the court process trello board or assisting DoJ officials.
Section 2(a): Judges approved by the Senate who are not on leave and do not have Judicial Activity(as defined above) twice per week may be legally sued or trialed for impeachment overthrowing the inactivity act for Judges only. (b) In the RARE case Judges have no Judicial activity to do they must go to a Department of Justice High Official who must verify this if no activity is submitted. If one piece of activity is sent a public announcement to the DoJ or the public must be sent out but does not have to be confirmed to avoid impeachment however a civil law suit can be filled if a case did not go to a case by the prosecution due to the fact that the liar Judge was unwilling to do his job. The prosecution cannot be the "United States" and the payment would be 5000 Las Vegas dollars per case.
Signed, Senator Technozo (R-NY)
~NUSA's YT Manager Ike #FreeBrady |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 May 2016 06:34 PM |
| Love the idea, Mr.Senator! I can not wait to see this become a act! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 20 May 2016 09:25 PM |
yeah!
federal courts are pretty fine and active right now, but now that you are just SHOVELING more stuff for us to do, i'm sure that will help our activity by 100!!!
no it won't.
giving us more stuff to do, i'm not sure you know what we do
• organize case times • contact defense in case in which never responds • same with prosecution • get threatened on every warrant made • make 20 minute verdicts • manage parts of USCP trello • manage cases • get a time from both sides within a week • keep active with warrant trello • keep active warrants and be a rule judge • give or preside over 2-3 hour cases • get threatened by guilt over people trying to decide common law
and those are legit a few things.
oh yeah, and soon post to maybe the fourth trello all judges will need to be added to two times or more a week or we'll be sued or impeached.
sounds great.
more stuff to do, more stress, less activity, less fair trials due to stress.
chain reactions
Judge Ocean Man |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 May 2016 09:30 PM |
This is really stupid.
-Dean of the Senate, AnimatedDannyo
ᗩᘉᓰᗰᗩ☂ᕮↁᗪᗩᘉᘉϒ〇 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
kyle90038
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 10841 |
|
| |
|
|
| 29 May 2016 03:51 AM |
This bill is totally unfair to the active judges as it forces them to take on another duty on top of their 10-15 duties all ready.
Why not check the court trello for the inactive judges? Oh no this judge hasn't taken a case in a month... Impeach them.
It's good on paper but disgusting in practice.
Signed, Justice H. Black |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Technozo
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 4086 |
|
|
| 29 May 2016 06:45 AM |
| You clearly did not read the bill. This is my fairest offer. Are you saying Judges cannot record two pieces of activity on a board PER week? Most Americans with jobs have patrol logs that are worse than this. If judges can't do that then I'm disturbed. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 31 May 2016 05:00 PM |
@Technozo Most americans with jobs that have patrol logs don't have to do a fraction of what judges have to do daily.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Technozo
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 4086 |
|
|
| 31 May 2016 05:12 PM |
Actually most Americans with jobs are doing more then what Judges do. This isn't to equalize that but rather to record and see what judges are doing.
~NUSA's YT Manager Ike #FreeBrady |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bakerley
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 12011 |
|
|
| 01 Jun 2016 05:45 PM |
Thank you very much for attacking the Judicial Branch for doing its job.
I, for one, will ignore this legislation if it is passed, and there's nothing that you can do about it. Why? Because you have failed to do the following things:
1) Amend the crime into the US Code 2) Define the maximum time a member of the Judicial Branch can be on leave for 3) Make the second half of your proposal legible
It's rather sad that I'm better at being a Congressman than you, and I left the Senate over a year ago.
That is all.
E pluribus unum, Federal Judge Bakerley |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Technozo
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 4086 |
|
|
| 02 Jun 2016 03:44 PM |
Okay there isn't any crimes I have listed out. If you're talking about the impeachment stuff it doesn't need to be outlined. You could be impeached for bringing candy to the US Capitol and the Senate can convict you of it, it's literally WHATEVER the House says.
Second, I think Judges have the right to go on leave. I'm just defining what it is because that way you won't be impeached or getting in trouble because that's what the law says. Now, I think there's a reasonable amount of time that you can be on leave for a certain situation. Being away for a year is not understandable but if you went to a funeral for one day I'm not sure why the Senate would convict you for that.
Now, I understand we have dedicated Judges(not sure about you though). The point of this is to outline what Judges accomplish. There's several benefits I can give.
First, if Judges are asked to take another job in the DoJ or be a Supreme Court Justice this is like a resume for them which is also a public database. Secondly, notice how AoS's DO NOT count as Judicial Activity for the board. I have seen Judges which I won't name abuse the system and only AoS people which isn't right and this will crack down on that. Thirdly, this will bring an extra layer transparency to the Judicial system. People want transparency in Government and this will ensure it to the best possible way.
There ya have it.
~NUSA's YT Manager Ike #FreeBrady |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|