|
| 12 May 2016 02:54 AM |
These are just some rules all the PPN could agree with. Obviously will need all nations leaders to agree.
-All nuclear and atomic bombs are dismantled and none created. -Colonized countries must be cared for and Parliament/Congress must stay in power although Glorious Leaders may be kicked out. -A nation may not attack a civilian area with no Armed Forces. -A nation cannot claim victory or land without a signed surrender from opposing countries armed forces leader or nations overall leader.
These are just some ideas. Let me know what you agree with and what you think should be added and/or changed. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2016 04:59 AM |
[insert your reply here]
I had nothing to post here, sorry for making the useless post of this forum post. --------------------------------------------------- aeiou |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2016 05:07 AM |
| As EZIC's Co-leader I agree |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2016 07:58 AM |
"A nation may not attack a civilian area with no Armed Forces." So they CAN attack a civilian area, but they have to have armed forces... Double negatives. Just saying. I think you meant- "A nation may not attack a civilian area with any armed forces." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2016 02:35 PM |
| I mean if the area is simply innocent civilians they can npot attack but if their is hostile armed forces, they can. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2016 02:43 PM |
PAHEYPHURS PLUEASE
GLORY TO GLORIOUS ARSTOTZKA. GLORY. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
LNG257
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jun 2012 |
| Total Posts: 11767 |
|
|
| 12 May 2016 02:45 PM |
| GLORY TO ARSTOTZKA. GLORY FOR GLORIOUS ARSTOTZKA. I MUST FEED MY FAMILY AND SPREAD GLORY. GLORY GLORY GLORY. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 May 2016 11:43 AM |
| Oh no, you misunderstand. I understood what you mean, but the writing is confusing due to the double negative. If you meant that they can only attack an area with hostile forces than you may think of doing more than one sentence in this case. Now that I actually understood what you said I'd probably word it something like-"Under any circumstances can armed forces attack an area with a lack of hostile enemy forces." It's still a little shaky but gets the message across. Like I said more sentences sometimes help, but I'm not here to make rules for you, I just stopped by because I was interested. Good luck with whatever this is! I could help with other stuff if you want, just message me, but for now I won't bug you anymore. :) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|