|
| 08 May 2016 09:39 AM |
Pretty pathetic that you would stoop to the level of openly supporting cheating and the use of dirty tactics.
Your once honorable clans (Should they have been honorable from the start) deserve to rot. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
OwneD1991
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 12623 |
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:41 AM |
| go back to hiding behind your frost bows |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
| |
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:43 AM |
Yeah we hide behind a symmetrical base, 6 defenders against 24 raiders in a 30 player server, even spawns, a midpoint that allows Raiders to spawn 50% closer than us (A midpoint that is also neutral at the beginning of any server, meaning Raiders can take it without FC there), access to everything for each team, an open flag to see any incoming FC, and the same weapons for all.
Just because your amazing RCL fighters can't understand the concept of gravity with an arrow doesn't mean we hide behind our base. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:44 AM |
| raa/synoan is cool but yeah the rest are complete ass. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:45 AM |
"biased"
How so? Because FC is allied with UAF and FoA, and we were also allied to RAT?
My clan affiliations mean nothing for this point of view - it is clear that RAT cheats and uses dirty tactics. Whether I'm in FC or not, this wouldn't make a difference and it doesn't take a genius to show that RAT represents a clan attitude that has destroyed this clan world. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
| |
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:48 AM |
| what do you mean gravity xD |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
OwneD1991
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 12623 |
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:49 AM |
'it doesn't take a genius to show that RAT represents a clan attitude that has destroyed this clan world.'
You don't believe what UAF or FoA has done ruins the clan world also?
How about the updating of their base after a loss to add more defensive advantages? How about doing that over and over each time you lose at your base?
Honestly, the point you are arguing is 100% biased and there's no reason to deny it.
Hell, even my point is biased. All three clans have played dirty in this, and denying FoA and UAF's involvement is just plain ignorant. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:50 AM |
They have better damage guns, they use "blacklists" to ban anyone they want from their forts (Even if the person did not break one rule at the fort. Blacklists are meant to bar people from the group, it should have no effect upon the banlist at the fort unless said person is an exploiter), they use unfair bases, they use script limits to deny defending from their members (Yet they claim to be a super clan who accepts everyone), they decline wars, they ban good Raiders from their fort for no reason (Not even saying they were blacklisted), they use the ally tab to hide from defeats, they had exploiters as HR (Surgence), etc.
Oh and most importantly (Perhaps even more important than better damage guns) is the fact that after losing at their fort they put in 3 shot pistols to decrease losses.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bazzzaa
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Apr 2008 |
| Total Posts: 1589 |
|
| |
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:51 AM |
@Mohxy
https://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=188758233
I've personally spoken to Polymorphic and the entire RAT HICOM on this issue, and they have consistently refused to justify their antics. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:52 AM |
RAT doesn't cheat but they could've cut back on not using the three shot pistols.
FoA handled it horribly & started spamming on the forums & constantly annoying RAT about it (which isnt how you get people to stop by the way)
Base updates to their advantage have been made primarily by FoA & UAF, I haven't heard of RAT making base updates. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
OwneD1991
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 12623 |
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:53 AM |
'Oh and most importantly (Perhaps even more important than better damage guns) is the fact that after losing at their fort they put in 3 shot pistols to decrease losses.'
I love that your most important point is also something that both the clans you are supporting have done.
UAF's multiple updates to Stonecarve to reduce losses FoA's millions of updates to Stronghold II to reduce losses
Hypocrisy at its finest. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:53 AM |
@iso
"mY gUn nO ShOOt StrAiGht >:((((("
@owned
There are differences between balancing a base and making updates to win. What updates occurred, making leafs bigger? Lol.
Also how has UAF cheated? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:53 AM |
| Those less-damage guns for raiders you talk about are on a decommisioned and unused base that the development department hasn't worked on for a long, long time. It's simply a bug that had not been noticed since the base hasn't been used for a long time for anyone to pick the glitch out. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:54 AM |
I haven't made any updates
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:54 AM |
"I love that your most important point is also something that both the clans you are supporting have done."
Oh yeah I forgot that UAF and FoA added better guns (That are only given to those defenders) to win!
I'm sorry but if you honestly count balancing a base such as Stonecarve as cheating you're an idiot, no wonder why SC got pummeled. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
OwneD1991
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 12623 |
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:55 AM |
'There are differences between balancing a base and making updates to win. What updates occurred, making leafs bigger? Lol.
Also how has UAF cheated?'
Is what FoA did really balancing a base? Are you kidding me? Neder I know you're not dumb, come on. If you want to try and claim FoA's updates to Stronghold II are balancing updates, then the same can be claimed to the weapon updates to Celeste. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:56 AM |
| What has FoA updated then? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
MLGRCLer
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2014 |
| Total Posts: 734 |
|
|
| 08 May 2016 09:59 AM |
UAF added a gate to F3 made mountains unaccessible for raiders removed mangled weapons wiped credits.
added a gate that blocks the main gate added a spawn on the cliffs.
yet RAT is the one playing dirty.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
OwneD1991
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 12623 |
|
|
| 08 May 2016 10:00 AM |
'What has FoA updated then?'
You mean the redesign of their base just to favor defenders? Every time someone raids them, there's a new defensive update lol
I don't know if you're being purposely dense or what |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
OwneD1991
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 12623 |
|
|
| 08 May 2016 10:01 AM |
'UAF added a gate to F3 made mountains unaccessible for raiders removed mangled weapons wiped credits.
added a gate that blocks the main gate added a spawn on the cliffs.
yet RAT is the one playing dirty.'
this. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Scriws
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Jan 2014 |
| Total Posts: 1772 |
|
|
| 08 May 2016 10:03 AM |
"UAF added a gate to F3 made mountains unaccessible for raiders removed mangled weapons wiped credits.
added a gate that blocks the main gate added a spawn on the cliffs"
Gate to F3 - You can't hit a button?
Mountains Unaccesible - You ever raid? Because you have mountains
Removed mangled weapons and swipe credits - THIS BENEFITS U, DO YOU WANT US ALL TO HAVE THE BEST GUN WHEN YOU JOIN
Gate to main gate - Button.
Spawn on cliffs - yeah unfair but nothing compared to ur admiral pistols so? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|