|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:03 AM |
- He wants to change the name of the group - He wants to change fort fang - He already changed the guns, training places - He already changed rank names, ranks
JC will no longer be JC with these changes.
Atom you need to realise that you are a group holder, not our leader. If you can't protect our values you shouldn't be holding it at the first place.
If it ever becomes Atoms Cobras I will leave. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:04 AM |
JC is trash and trying to fix that is bad??
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:08 AM |
| Don't forget the crappy logo |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:13 AM |
| Good for him. The ranks, fort, and guns are outdated. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
MOO_JL
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Apr 2016 |
| Total Posts: 700 |
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:14 AM |
Finally the group might make some progress?! How dare they.
[UAFVIZ] ~Moo~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
5ancu
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2015 |
| Total Posts: 6771 |
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:15 AM |
| I don't get why he wants to scrap the idea of a Fort Fang completely, his safest bet to recreate and regain activity with JC is revamping Fort Fang so it looks all fresh and new, and once he has gained the members' trust, he can start experimenting, and if it all goes t**s up, he can always revert. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
5ancu
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2015 |
| Total Posts: 6771 |
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:16 AM |
his safest bet is to recreate*
I've been up for like two or three days, apologies... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:19 AM |
| wow they are planning on not adding divisions *flips desk* |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:24 AM |
harb, atom just got his leadership back so just give jc some time to recover
who knows jc might stay the same |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:30 AM |
| It's already heading backwards rofl |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ShadowSTR
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 24465 |
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:30 AM |
| Turning a dead clan around how terrible! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:32 AM |
why is it bad to upgrade our technology
rank names are pretty much same, with the exception of Lieutenant Colonel, Vice[Supreme] Commander, Staff Sergeant and Militant
there have been many clans that kept to the same assets and are now long gone
also it's 2k16, we can't keep the SAME Fang any longer.
just give the new stuff a chance, what makes JC what it has been is not technology and the assets it uses, it's the people themselves. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:33 AM |
| No revamp the old, regain activity then experiment and listen to the peoples demands. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:37 AM |
listening to certain people's demands is not always a good thing
also you people who want the old stuff back haven't even tried or seen the new stuff, how would you know if they are bad or not
anyways, as i said, what makes JC are the members, not the tech and the assets |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Glerax
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 16552 |
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:39 AM |
| also atom isn't the group holder, he is actually the leader |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:40 AM |
I see why you got your ranks.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
strafe
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Apr 2008 |
| Total Posts: 298 |
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:41 AM |
'also it's 2k16, we can't keep the SAME Fang any longer.'
You're missing the point that a number of people are *asking* for Atomic to use Fort Fang, due to it being a great fort. (even with how old it is)
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:44 AM |
They don't understand how JC works and like the HRs under steff they will just repeat what atom is saying or make sure their answers supports atoms ideas to get in favour.
very sad. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:44 AM |
"wow they are planning on not adding divisions *flips desk*"
Funny because I asked Atomic yesterday if he was adding divisions back and he said yes.
Also I don't really agree with fort fang being removed, but it's his choice in the end. My suggestion would be to revamp fang completely, but it's still his choice to actually make new and good tech for JC. Fang has been around for what, 5 years now? We can't have current fang forever. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:46 AM |
| Cobras demands+cng oppinion> Atoms plans. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:53 AM |
"I see why you got your ranks."
If you think that's how I got my rank then go ahead buddy, prove yourself right and me wrong.
"You're missing the point that a number of people are *asking* for Atomic to use Fort Fang, due to it being a great fort. (even with how old it is)"
I understand that many people are asking for Fang, which I also believe is a great fort, but how are we supposed to bring new members in if we are using the same fort for years to come?
"They don't understand how JC works and like the HRs under steff they will just repeat what atom is saying or make sure their answers supports atoms ideas to get in favour."
As far I know, the HRs under steff tried to keep JC alive as much as they could. However, they didn't want to bring new stuff in the table, just revamp some of them.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:55 AM |
Fang is a base that is raided often and always defended at.
That's what makes us active, that's what gets us new members.
Revamp the old fang with a fresh look and new scripts. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:55 AM |
But anyways, bring this arguement to the group wall.
It would be better to have other JC participate in this as well, rather than have it accessible only to a handfull of members. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2016 10:57 AM |
| JC is relevant to CnG and there for I post it here. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|