|
| 12 Apr 2016 01:58 PM |
Mods being insensitive to the concept of personal fruitcake?
https://www.roblox.com/you-tried-item?id=128866057 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2016 02:00 PM |
| Yes there were definitely no immature intentions with setting the group as your primary on the forums |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Apr 2016 02:00 PM |
I don't see anything wrong with it, it's a pro-personal fruitcake group.
https://www.roblox.com/you-tried-item?id=128866057 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2016 02:02 PM |
Yeah, I know. Implied F-bombs.
But seriously, they don't ban Squidward because his eye-nose position can be considered phallic by some dirty-minded kid, so why should they ban something that implies an F-bomb but isn't?
https://www.roblox.com/you-tried-item?id=128866057 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Apr 2016 02:07 PM |
It's obvious what you were trying to do with the group name. Just like the "I don't give a ship to pirates" group.
A character who's not intentionally designed to be inappropriate is a poor argument. It's like saying we need to ban hands because you can use them to punch someone and they should be banned for being too violent. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Apr 2016 02:08 PM |
I'm not sure about your stance based on that last metaphor.
https://www.roblox.com/you-tried-item?id=128866057 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Apr 2016 02:48 PM |
| He's saying there's a large difference between being intentionally and unintentionally inappropriate. The group was intentionally inappropriate. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|