generic image
Processing...
  • Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • Robux
  • Search in Players
  • Search in Games
  • Search in Catalog
  • Search in Groups
  • Search in Library
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
  • Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • Robux
We use cookies to offer you a better experience. By using Roblox.com, you are agreeing to our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
   
ROBLOX Forum » Club Houses » Clans & Guilds
Home Search
 

Re: [CON] Expulsion of Representative JackieSharp

Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
KaroWhitt is not online. KaroWhitt
Joined: 22 Feb 2013
Total Posts: 1078
10 Apr 2016 12:53 AM
The reason why I am asking for this expulsion to pass is because of a new, uncovered statement full of truths about the REAL JackieSharp (which you may find here: https://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=187093891). For the record, I am NOT writing this out of Conflict of Interest. The facts stated in the forum and what I am telling you below are nothing but cold, hard truth.

In the forum, it says Jackie had alt votes, which you can definitely tell by looking at the accounts that voted for her, no rocket science required. Several accounts are obviously alt accounts of hers, or alts from her friends that she has used for her own personal gain, getting votes for the House.

The account names that were used:

ElisabethMaireBlois: This account is obviously fake, the postcount is less than 30, and its only used when the time comes around to vote for Jackie.

zja99 and qza69: These accounts are relatively similar to each other, they voted for Jackie. The accounts also have a similar bio. Both are never on, unless it is elections.

LadyCarolineII: JackieSharp's old username was " LadyVictoriaII ", coincidence? I think not. Jackie said this account is her friend, but how can we be so sure when she has had these alt accounts vote for her before?

BryanIV: This is Jackie's brother, who quit a few years ago. Apparently she made him " get back on to vote for her ", but that's VERY suspicious. She could've easily just logged onto his account to vote herself. She has also admitted to getting onto his account to vote herself.

NancyLuPone: Only has 2 forum posts, and is in the same groups as Jackie.

Beetee910: Isn't even in the NUSA group. Their vote for Jackie was their only forum post.

NorwayHolders: Its' bio says it is used by the leaders of Norway. Enough said.

Links to the two elections:
https://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=186866276
http://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=181194582

Any usernames look familar?

I won't stand for people being voted in with alts, especially if the person running is the one also using the alts for their own benefit. I do believe this whole expulsion could have been avoided if the HEC had did their job and looked into this before releasing the winning ballot, but it's too late for that now. Someone else could've gotten in fair and square, which JackieSharp did not allow for to happen. She is power-hungry and focused on her Vice Presidential campaign, not the House or any citizens.

(A big thank you to Officer38 for this information!!)

Signed,
KaroWhitt
Soviet510
Report Abuse
KaroWhitt is not online. KaroWhitt
Joined: 22 Feb 2013
Total Posts: 1078
10 Apr 2016 12:54 AM
aye
Report Abuse
soviet510 is not online. soviet510
Joined: 17 Sep 2012
Total Posts: 2705
10 Apr 2016 01:04 AM
aye
Report Abuse
Benjamin897 is not online. Benjamin897
Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Total Posts: 4139
10 Apr 2016 01:04 AM
I URGE ALL MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE TO AYE JACKIES EXPULSION,

AS BEING HER FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF DURING HER CAMPAIGN TRAIL TO THE HOUSE I CAN CONFIRM THAT JACKIE DID INDEED USE ALTS TO WIN THE ELECTION.


Report Abuse
Puresleepy is not online. Puresleepy
Joined: 20 Jan 2016
Total Posts: 1730
10 Apr 2016 01:08 AM
She'll going to be adamstratton secretary.


1667 posts and paracosm is my daddy.
Report Abuse
Swordmaker is not online. Swordmaker
Joined: 06 Mar 2009
Total Posts: 13627
10 Apr 2016 01:09 AM
Nay.

This is a serious notion you're bringing up. You've based it entirely upon speculation. Cases of electoral fraud, especially in scenarios like these, are >incredibly< hard to trace and find definitive evidence on.

Needless to say, I think it's incredibly irrational to base someone's expulsion on what was provided in your body.
Report Abuse
Swordmaker is not online. Swordmaker
Joined: 06 Mar 2009
Total Posts: 13627
10 Apr 2016 01:10 AM
However, I do >THOROUGHLY< urge the House Elections Committee to investigate Congresswoman JackieSharp in regards to the recent election. This should be done first, then we can proceed with a possible notion to expel.
Report Abuse
KaroWhitt is not online. KaroWhitt
Joined: 22 Feb 2013
Total Posts: 1078
10 Apr 2016 01:13 AM
@Sword thats ok you have your own opinion
but the facts that these accounts are primarily active for elections is not okay, and the fact that some of these accounts have voted for her before is entirely suspicious. especially her brothers account and ladycaroline. i wouldnt have been making this if the hec did their job lol.
Report Abuse
Swordmaker is not online. Swordmaker
Joined: 06 Mar 2009
Total Posts: 13627
10 Apr 2016 01:15 AM
Don't get me wrong, I agree - it's incredibly suspicious. However, I'd much rather go about this formally in a thorough investigation performed by the HEC. This will allow the HEC to review evidence to the fullest extent collected, and proceed with their opinion.

Report Abuse
soviet510 is not online. soviet510
Joined: 17 Sep 2012
Total Posts: 2705
10 Apr 2016 01:23 AM
The HEC doesn't conduct investigation.


Report Abuse
RAZVANPAUL is not online. RAZVANPAUL
Joined: 21 Feb 2009
Total Posts: 1080
10 Apr 2016 01:26 AM
Aye
Report Abuse
JackieSharp is not online. JackieSharp
Joined: 27 Jul 2014
Total Posts: 301
10 Apr 2016 01:56 AM
Nay
Report Abuse
LordFrancisSmith is online. LordFrancisSmith
Joined: 18 Dec 2013
Total Posts: 289
10 Apr 2016 04:58 AM
I feel that it'd be unfair to base this only on especulation. Although I'd like to hear more about and I urge the Department of Justice to look into this. Regarding the video, I believe that she has been already removed from her position for this, when she was in the Senate.

My vote for now is abstain, I'd like to get more information on this though.

Signed,
Congressman Francis K. Smith
Report Abuse
TheRatchetGoomba is not online. TheRatchetGoomba
Joined: 08 Nov 2014
Total Posts: 7724
10 Apr 2016 05:37 AM
Aye, however I think the Department of Justice should look at this.


Report Abuse
SuddenRush12G is not online. SuddenRush12G
Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Total Posts: 11565
10 Apr 2016 05:55 AM
Signed.
Report Abuse
SuddenRush12G is not online. SuddenRush12G
Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Total Posts: 11565
10 Apr 2016 05:56 AM
I stand neutral on this and I posted on the wrong thread.

My stance is neutral.

Ignore my post.
Report Abuse
iSightU is not online. iSightU
Joined: 31 Mar 2015
Total Posts: 59
10 Apr 2016 06:07 AM
Before I vote, I believe that an investigation should be conducted by some USA agency. Maybe IAB, USMS or something.

Due to the fact that an investigation has not be conducted -- no harsh feelings to anyone,

Abstain.

Report Abuse
Locative is not online. Locative
Joined: 22 Sep 2011
Total Posts: 7501
10 Apr 2016 06:46 AM
nay because womens rights

Report Abuse
TheRatchetGoomba is not online. TheRatchetGoomba
Joined: 08 Nov 2014
Total Posts: 7724
10 Apr 2016 06:49 AM
i change my vote to abstain

though i still think that the department of justice should investigate


Report Abuse
tonsofyumyums is not online. tonsofyumyums
Joined: 19 Sep 2013
Total Posts: 2359
10 Apr 2016 07:03 AM
Abstain I would like DOJ to have an investigation into her and then tell us the results.


Report Abuse
disn1245 is not online. disn1245
Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Total Posts: 1208
10 Apr 2016 08:29 AM
Abstain.
First of all, some investigations need to take place in this topic. And she has already been expelled for whatever she did (virtual marriges, etc.) so therefore there is no need for an immediate expulsion.

Signed,
Disn1245
Speaker Pro Tempore
Report Abuse
chiefpelican is not online. chiefpelican
Joined: 17 Nov 2013
Total Posts: 533
10 Apr 2016 09:01 AM
Aye.
I like to expel people.
Report Abuse
MarkMacKinnon is not online. MarkMacKinnon
Joined: 30 Aug 2011
Total Posts: 124
10 Apr 2016 09:19 AM
Abstain,
I believe like TheRatchetGoomba, the DoJ should investigate.
Report Abuse
Doug_Stamper is not online. Doug_Stamper
Joined: 20 May 2011
Total Posts: 649
10 Apr 2016 11:28 AM
IF I MAY ADD,

That forum was not made without putting thought into it. I have multiple witnesses that will provide that JackieSharp specifically used her brothers account BryanIV to vote for her.
Report Abuse
DeviousQueen is not online. DeviousQueen
Joined: 03 Nov 2013
Total Posts: 2514
10 Apr 2016 01:50 PM
Abstain.

I agree with everyone else - a proper investigation should occur first. The results of the investigation should then determine if an expulsion vote is to continue or not.

Signed,
Representative DeviousQueen
Report Abuse
Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
Page 1 of 1
 
 
ROBLOX Forum » Club Houses » Clans & Guilds
   
 
   
  • About Us
  • Jobs
  • Blog
  • Parents
  • Help
  • Terms
  • Privacy

©2017 Roblox Corporation. Roblox, the Roblox logo, Robux, Bloxy, and Powering Imagination are among our registered and unregistered trademarks in the U.S. and other countries.



Progress
Starting Roblox...
Connecting to Players...
R R

Roblox is now loading. Get ready to play!

R R

You're moments away from getting into the game!

Click here for help

Check Remember my choice and click Launch Application in the dialog box above to join games faster in the future!

Gameplay sponsored by:
Loading 0% - Starting game...
Get more with Builders Club! Join Builders Club
Choose Your Avatar
I have an account
generic image