KaroWhitt
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1078 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 12:53 AM |
The reason why I am asking for this expulsion to pass is because of a new, uncovered statement full of truths about the REAL JackieSharp (which you may find here: https://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=187093891). For the record, I am NOT writing this out of Conflict of Interest. The facts stated in the forum and what I am telling you below are nothing but cold, hard truth.
In the forum, it says Jackie had alt votes, which you can definitely tell by looking at the accounts that voted for her, no rocket science required. Several accounts are obviously alt accounts of hers, or alts from her friends that she has used for her own personal gain, getting votes for the House.
The account names that were used:
ElisabethMaireBlois: This account is obviously fake, the postcount is less than 30, and its only used when the time comes around to vote for Jackie.
zja99 and qza69: These accounts are relatively similar to each other, they voted for Jackie. The accounts also have a similar bio. Both are never on, unless it is elections.
LadyCarolineII: JackieSharp's old username was " LadyVictoriaII ", coincidence? I think not. Jackie said this account is her friend, but how can we be so sure when she has had these alt accounts vote for her before?
BryanIV: This is Jackie's brother, who quit a few years ago. Apparently she made him " get back on to vote for her ", but that's VERY suspicious. She could've easily just logged onto his account to vote herself. She has also admitted to getting onto his account to vote herself.
NancyLuPone: Only has 2 forum posts, and is in the same groups as Jackie.
Beetee910: Isn't even in the NUSA group. Their vote for Jackie was their only forum post.
NorwayHolders: Its' bio says it is used by the leaders of Norway. Enough said.
Links to the two elections: https://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=186866276 http://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=181194582
Any usernames look familar?
I won't stand for people being voted in with alts, especially if the person running is the one also using the alts for their own benefit. I do believe this whole expulsion could have been avoided if the HEC had did their job and looked into this before releasing the winning ballot, but it's too late for that now. Someone else could've gotten in fair and square, which JackieSharp did not allow for to happen. She is power-hungry and focused on her Vice Presidential campaign, not the House or any citizens.
(A big thank you to Officer38 for this information!!)
Signed, KaroWhitt Soviet510 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
KaroWhitt
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1078 |
|
| |
|
soviet510
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Sep 2012 |
| Total Posts: 2705 |
|
| |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 01:04 AM |
I URGE ALL MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE TO AYE JACKIES EXPULSION,
AS BEING HER FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF DURING HER CAMPAIGN TRAIL TO THE HOUSE I CAN CONFIRM THAT JACKIE DID INDEED USE ALTS TO WIN THE ELECTION.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 01:08 AM |
She'll going to be adamstratton secretary.
1667 posts and paracosm is my daddy. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 01:09 AM |
Nay.
This is a serious notion you're bringing up. You've based it entirely upon speculation. Cases of electoral fraud, especially in scenarios like these, are >incredibly< hard to trace and find definitive evidence on.
Needless to say, I think it's incredibly irrational to base someone's expulsion on what was provided in your body. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 01:10 AM |
| However, I do >THOROUGHLY< urge the House Elections Committee to investigate Congresswoman JackieSharp in regards to the recent election. This should be done first, then we can proceed with a possible notion to expel. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
KaroWhitt
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1078 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 01:13 AM |
@Sword thats ok you have your own opinion but the facts that these accounts are primarily active for elections is not okay, and the fact that some of these accounts have voted for her before is entirely suspicious. especially her brothers account and ladycaroline. i wouldnt have been making this if the hec did their job lol. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 01:15 AM |
Don't get me wrong, I agree - it's incredibly suspicious. However, I'd much rather go about this formally in a thorough investigation performed by the HEC. This will allow the HEC to review evidence to the fullest extent collected, and proceed with their opinion.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
soviet510
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Sep 2012 |
| Total Posts: 2705 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 01:23 AM |
The HEC doesn't conduct investigation.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 04:58 AM |
I feel that it'd be unfair to base this only on especulation. Although I'd like to hear more about and I urge the Department of Justice to look into this. Regarding the video, I believe that she has been already removed from her position for this, when she was in the Senate.
My vote for now is abstain, I'd like to get more information on this though.
Signed, Congressman Francis K. Smith |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 05:37 AM |
Aye, however I think the Department of Justice should look at this.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 05:56 AM |
I stand neutral on this and I posted on the wrong thread.
My stance is neutral.
Ignore my post. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
iSightU
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 59 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 06:07 AM |
Before I vote, I believe that an investigation should be conducted by some USA agency. Maybe IAB, USMS or something.
Due to the fact that an investigation has not be conducted -- no harsh feelings to anyone,
Abstain.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Locative
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 7501 |
|
| |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 06:49 AM |
i change my vote to abstain
though i still think that the department of justice should investigate
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 07:03 AM |
Abstain I would like DOJ to have an investigation into her and then tell us the results.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
disn1245
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1208 |
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 08:29 AM |
Abstain. First of all, some investigations need to take place in this topic. And she has already been expelled for whatever she did (virtual marriges, etc.) so therefore there is no need for an immediate expulsion.
Signed, Disn1245 Speaker Pro Tempore
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 09:01 AM |
Aye. I like to expel people. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 09:19 AM |
Abstain, I believe like TheRatchetGoomba, the DoJ should investigate. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 11:28 AM |
IF I MAY ADD,
That forum was not made without putting thought into it. I have multiple witnesses that will provide that JackieSharp specifically used her brothers account BryanIV to vote for her. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Apr 2016 01:50 PM |
Abstain.
I agree with everyone else - a proper investigation should occur first. The results of the investigation should then determine if an expulsion vote is to continue or not.
Signed, Representative DeviousQueen |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|