Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:10 AM |
FoA, VAK, and CSP
Anyone wanna debate? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Soloking1
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 24253 |
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:12 AM |
Not at all
Reavers are good and TCC is good, you are just a bunch of merc slaves too devoted to think for yourselves. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Synoan
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 15658 |
|
| |
|
Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:21 AM |
Synoan,
Raid SMO with RAA and get timer above 1500 then lol
RAA has some decent fighters but it's not the same as it was before & you could agree with me on that |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:22 AM |
| fc non-debatable #1 raiding squad would 100-0 vak despite 15v15 if we felt like it |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Soloking1
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 24253 |
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:23 AM |
Mohxy
Raid SMO and get terminal to 200, 10 raiders vs 20 VAK/VAC and it's only you catch it and hold it alone. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
strafe
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Apr 2008 |
| Total Posts: 298 |
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:26 AM |
| I really like your raid log document idea. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
r_y
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Feb 2016 |
| Total Posts: 3085 |
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:28 AM |
I beg to differ TBH.
FoA is easy as hell defending against if you get decent defenders in
I'd say SF can beat CSP and FoA. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:28 AM |
| I've gotten terminal to 200 myself |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:29 AM |
csp isn't a top raid team
and neither is vak
A-team, aww don't try to play us, A-team. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:30 AM |
| Mohxy not CSP please. Their official release date was 29th January. I have heard from people in CSP saying that too. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Synoan
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 15658 |
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:30 AM |
I have no doubt that I can do that
But you can't credit FoA with that since Paul and SF were there too |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:30 AM |
This thread is not about who can beat who in a war because a lot plays in that. RAT could beat FoA in a war but FoA individually has better fighters & a better raid team.
SF doesn't have that many good raiders in my opinion. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:31 AM |
vak - loses to foa all the time and lost to uaf at genesis, can't see what qualifies them
foa - good but cant think of anything noteworthy that qualifies them
csp - same as foa |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:31 AM |
| And FoA... VAK are bull, cut em off, they are dumarss, they perm banned 2 Raiders from FoA for doing well. I hope CSP does t grow up like them |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:33 AM |
Have you ever defended against VAK assassin?
LordMilt,
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lDgoWVm8C9rizdys1iuwr_yyN3qeZP5Ez4B7Tc73RAc/edit#gid=0
Stats don't lie
@Synoan,
You say FoA isn't good because they started losing raids at Coventry when you switched bases mid war. As someone who has raided Coventry for a long time, there was obviously something up with the mountain CP because no raider spawned there. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Synoan
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 15658 |
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:35 AM |
| No I say they're not because they complain about bases they don't win at like SURGE, OO, FW2 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:35 AM |
| yes i have defended against vak with foa and uaf, and won everytime defending against them. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:37 AM |
FoA won against OO a few days ago. SF & VOID joint raided OO the day after FoA raided & they lost several times.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
jwojwo12
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 976 |
|
| |
|
Synoan
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 15658 |
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:38 AM |
You can't judge a raid team off of one raid
VAK lost at OO's base too |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:38 AM |
| you're using 1 raid as an example of why 1 clan has a better raiding team as a whole. individual random raids don't matter, war raids matter. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 01 Apr 2016 10:38 AM |
A raid log doesn't mean anything mohxy V O I D went on a 100 raid win streak and at one point had over 300 more wins compared to losses for raids alone, and like 40 of those came from smo 2 lol.
Stats don't really mean anything, and you can't even say FoA's raid team is brilliant because they still haven't won at smo, they've just gotten close, failure regardless of how close it is to success shouldn't be praised.
VAK hasn't had a successful raid team for aobut 4 months and it was in december with aviationtechnology,enigma,praetors,isodore,chalst,brizingerz,lordevo,fourpapa,astrochemistry,damien and like 4 other people im forgetting.
A-team, aww don't try to play us, A-team. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|