Chiwahwa
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1044 |
|
|
| 25 Mar 2016 12:24 PM |
NFC North 1. Minnesota Vikings 12-4 2. Chicago Bears 10-6 3. Green Bay Packers 10-6 4. Detroit Lions 6-10
NFC East 1. Washington Redskins 10-6 2. Dallas Cowboys 9-7 3. New York Giants 5-11 4. Philadelphia Eagles 3-13
NFC South 1. Carolina Panthers 14-2 2. Atlanta Falcons 10-6 3. Tampa Bay Buccaneers 8-8 4. New Orleans Saints 4-12
NFC West 1. Seattle Seahawks 12-4 2. Arizona Cardinals 12-4 3. Los Angeles Rams 5-11 4. San Francisco 49ers 3-13
AFC North 1. Pittsburgh Steelers 11-5 2. Cincinnati Bengals 9-7 3. Baltimore Ravens 7-9 4. Cleveland Browns 2-14 (give time for Hue Jackson to build his team)
AFC East 1. New England Patriots 12-4 2. New York Jets 8-8 (what are they gonna do at QB?) 3. Buffalo Bills 5-11 (the Rex Ryan syndrome) 4. Miami Dolphins 4-12 (so many bad moves, feel bad for Adam Gase)
AFC South 1. Indianapolis Colts 11-5 (assuming Andrew Luck comes back strong) 2. Jacksonville Jaguars 9-7 3. Tennessee Titans 6-10 4. Houston Texans 5-11 ($72 mil for Osweilier a deal losing teams would make)
AFC West 1. Oakland Raiders 11-5 (yeah I said it) 2. Denver Broncos 11-5 (bad offseason so far) 3. Kansas City Chiefs 10-6 4. San Diego Chargers 7-9 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2016 12:27 PM |
The cowboys will win the division if Romo is healthy
It's gonna be hard for the vikes to win the division again, but we'll see.
The chiefs will win the division.
Patriots 13-3
Texans higher than the titans.
Carolina 12-4
Bears 9-7
Browns better than 2-14
Ravens 7-9??
Are you kidding me |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Chiwahwa
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1044 |
|
|
| 25 Mar 2016 02:40 PM |
| cowboys had more flaws than just romo being hurt afc west is really hard to predict 3 teams could win the division panthers are better than 12-4 i said bears go 9-7 or 10-6 i just put 10-6 cause i'm a hopeful fan :3 browns need a lot of work they could go 3-13 or 2-14 i said ravens 7-9 cause for some reason i thought they were like 3-13 lol my bad still they stryggled even with flacco and forsett they could go 8-8 though good improvement from 5-11 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2016 02:43 PM |
NFC North 1. Minnesota Vikings 12-4 2. Chicago Bears 10-6 3. Green Bay Packers 10-6 4. Detroit Lions 6-10
lol typical bears fan right here
more like bears 8-8 and packers 12-4 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2016 02:46 PM |
| Giants aren't going to be worse than last year????? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2016 02:47 PM |
"1. Oakland Raiders 11-5 (yeah I said it)" i love u |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2016 02:50 PM |
| tbh the carolina panthers 15-1 reg season looked like a one time stint and they'll go 10-6, 11-5, or 12-4 at best this year |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2016 03:10 PM |
packers going undefeated
The Freezing Flame, in High Definition |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2016 03:23 PM |
Green Bay Packers Schedule
Home: Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Minnesota Vikings, Dallas Cowboys, New York Giants, Seattle Seahawks, Houston Texans, Indianapolis Colts
Away: Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Minnesota Vikings, Philadelphia Eagles, Washington Redskins, Atlanta Falcons, Jacksonville Jaguars, Tennessee Titans
Only teams I can see beating the Packers are Minnesota, Dallas (assuming Romo stays healthy), and Seattle.
That makes our record, at least, 12-4.
Packers will probably split the games with Minnesota, making them 13-3.
Packers can probably beat Dallas too (Dez' didn't catch the ball), making them 14-2.
Packers have a good recent history against Seattle (except for the playoffs), making them 15-1.
The Freezing Flame, in High Definition |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
BroBro264
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 28121 |
|
|
| 25 Mar 2016 03:28 PM |
"making them 15-1"
keep dreaming buddy |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2016 03:34 PM |
Their schedule is so easy this season. The schedule for out-of-division games is on a rotation for every season, and this year the Packers ended up with the NFC East and AFC South, both divisions being arguably the worst in the league.
The Freezing Flame, in High Definition |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Mar 2016 03:40 PM |
I think it will be the Panthers Season this next season TX 5-11? They made the playoffs this year tho! I don't think it will be THAT bad of a record!
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Chiwahwa
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1044 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2016 12:49 AM |
| bears schedule is also easy which is why i said 10-6. also bears beat the packers last year they sure as hell can do it next year. giants are going to be worse imo new head coach and bad moves spending money like a kid in a candy shop that's what bad teams do maybe they will prove me wrong. also bears play every afc south team, i can see them beating them all, maybe not colts, beating every team in nfc east except maybe skins (not bought on cowboys this year romo is having surgery lol), bears could also VERY realisticly split with every nfc north team, maybe swept by vikings and maybe sweeping the lions, shouldn't lose to bucs or niners, making us 11-5 with losses to skins, packers, 2 from vikings, and colts. i could make arguments for wins against vikings colts and skins making us 14-2 LOL but it's not all gonna work out like that so i said 10-6 because of great defensive improvements through free agency (not spending a ton of money which is good) and easy schedule |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Chiwahwa
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1044 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2016 12:56 AM |
| ily 2 skyler and emporer the panthers did dominate so much and they're getting kelvin back i could see 13-3 or 14-2 still got the pieces. and "typical bears fan" who wouldn't put your team at 9-7 or 10-6 at least in year 2 of MASSIVE improvements, along with an easy schedule? not believing bears will go worse than 8-8 but it's a possibility with jay cutler anything can happen |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
afrobull
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Jun 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1591 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2016 01:10 AM |
NFC North 1. Minnesota Vikings 12-4 2. Chicago Bears 10-6 3. Green Bay Packers 10-6 4. Detroit Lions 6-10
vikings havent done anything in free agency except put franchise tag on Harrison
bears lost Forte and Bennett
packers re-signed players, didnt pick up anyone in free agency (typical)
lions i dont know but 6-10 is right
1. GB 2. MIN 3. DET 4. CHI
I am the one who knocks. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Mar 2016 03:04 AM |
AFC North will have 3 10 plus win teams The Steelers, Ravens, and Bengals, the Browns may get to around 6 wins maybe |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Alioc
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 215 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2016 07:24 AM |
bears 10-6, lmao ravens better be better than 7-9 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Chiwahwa
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1044 |
|
|
| 29 Mar 2016 11:59 AM |
If you think the bears will be worse than 6-10 you're stupid. No way it will be 1. GB 2. MIN 3. DET 4. CHI The Lions have another disaster season waiting to happen I assure you. The Vikings may not have signed anybody but that doesn't mean another year in the system, and AP's 2nd year back won't help them improve to maybe 12-4 with the easy schedule. The Bears' linebacking core has significantly improved and Kadeem Carey and Jeremy Langford will do fine in place of Forte. Martellus Bennett was a non-factor last year. Zach Miller was the guy and he did really well. You obviously don't know much if you say the Bears will be worse than 6-10. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
VezzieOG
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Aug 2013 |
| Total Posts: 10827 |
|
|
| 29 Mar 2016 12:03 PM |
"packers re-signed players, didnt pick up anyone in free agency (typical)" What about TE Cook from LA?
And there is no way the Packers don't win the division healthy, we're too talented.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
afrobull
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Jun 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1591 |
|
|
| 29 Mar 2016 12:57 PM |
@vezz
posted before the deal, and Cook isnt a big pickup honestly
I am the one who knocks. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Mar 2016 01:22 PM |
| Texans offense is now better with Osweiler lol? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Chiwahwa
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1044 |
|
|
| 29 Mar 2016 02:02 PM |
| You can make an argument that every team gets better every offseason. That's not how it plays out. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Mar 2016 02:59 PM |
Jaguars overtake the Colts tbh
DominantShredder 10/28/2012 - 3/17/2014; Add 11k posts to post count R$189 TX84 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Mar 2016 04:27 PM |
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You couldn't even when Luck was injured lol
Now that he's healthy..
compete with the titans |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Chiwahwa
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1044 |
|
|
| 30 Mar 2016 07:34 PM |
| tbh he played like ass when he did play and jags could possibly be the greatest improved team in the league then again they probably bout to go 5-11 again or something like that lol. why? because they are the jacksonville jaguars and that is what they do lol |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|