|
| 24 Mar 2016 01:21 PM |
Is Encyclopaedia Britannica a good place to start?
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Mar 2016 01:22 PM |
It's a good source.
asian god. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
sdght34
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Jun 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5781 |
|
| |
|
|
| 24 Mar 2016 01:24 PM |
Alright, thanks Honoka. I've used Britannica as a go-to source for history and science in the past, was wondering if its credibility applied to politics.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
sdght34
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Jun 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5781 |
|
|
| 24 Mar 2016 01:25 PM |
| briticanna is british. all foreign opinions are irrelevant to US politics in an election |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Mar 2016 01:29 PM |
@sdght: But Britannica isn't opinionated?
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Mar 2016 01:30 PM |
I mean, seriously. If you look at Trump's page on Britannica, that's pretty neutral.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Valhalas
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 67829 |
|
|
| 24 Mar 2016 01:33 PM |
| Could read their websites for accurate info on their platforms too. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|