Azurane
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Sep 2015 |
| Total Posts: 1180 |
|
|
| 12 Mar 2016 12:44 PM |
| @nueva 36 ^ 20 would be 1.3367495e+31 possible name combinations. Adding the ability to use underscores would be 1.3367495e+31 x _s would depend on how many the user uses; so let's just use a estimate of 3 _s which would be 11.3367495e+3 x 3_s = 2.3886366e+93 possible names with underscores in 20 characters long. 11.3367495e+3 names without underscores. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Azurane
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Sep 2015 |
| Total Posts: 1180 |
|
|
| 12 Mar 2016 12:48 PM |
@nueva 36 ^ 20 would be 1. 336 74 95e+31. so let's use a estimate of 3 _s in _ names; because it would be extremely hard to get the exact number. 1.33 674 95e+31 ^ 3 would be 2.38 863 66e+ 93 possible estimated usernames for underscore names using 3 underscores. In names total without underscores the cap is 1. 336 74 95e+31 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Nueva
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Mar 2007 |
| Total Posts: 920 |
|
|
| 12 Mar 2016 12:48 PM |
But just think If I made a name like this djuskwlcud_amsnfueis. Just random letters compiled with an underscore, I could make so many of those.
-Nueva | 17367- |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Azurane
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Sep 2015 |
| Total Posts: 1180 |
|
|
| 12 Mar 2016 12:50 PM |
@nueva36 ^ 20 would be 1. 336 74 95e+31. so let's use a estimate of 3 _s in _ names; because it would be extremely hard to get the exact number. 1.33 674 95e+31 ^ 3 would be 2.38 863 66e+ 93 possible estimated usernames for underscore names using three underscores. In names TOTAL without underscores the cap is 1. 336 74 95e+31 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Nueva
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Mar 2007 |
| Total Posts: 920 |
|
|
| 12 Mar 2016 12:53 PM |
Yeah, that's a lot of names, which makes underscored names not to limited.
-Nueva | 17367- |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|