|
| 07 Mar 2016 08:03 PM |
of the base layout and the simple concept of "objectives" idk how many times I have to tell people this, the sheer fact that there is even numbers in a base where the raiders objective is to hold something for thirty minutes is literally lacking all sorts of sense, considering the defenders only objective is to retrieve the terminal.
I can name a million scenarios where in the raids i've lost at that smo we always have like four people in the terminal, ignoring the vak in the vak only room, but it won't matter if we can't lock the whole base down, it'll never matter because of "trump" cards like that.
The base is poorly designed at this point, and i'd rather just raid kaznan with those new fancy gui's that are actually really cool, kudos to opacor you did nice bro.
A-team, aww don't try to play us, A-team. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2016 08:04 PM |
| damn i havent seen you in a year or two |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2016 08:05 PM |
whats good lil bro
A-team, aww don't try to play us, A-team. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2016 08:05 PM |
if smo was really all about skill vak wouldn't be complaining about OO's base rn.
i'll just leave it at that lol
A-team, aww don't try to play us, A-team. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2016 08:06 PM |
| when has vak ever had a fair base? (varcia doesn't count) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2016 08:07 PM |
They never have, and the original smo was just utter garbage, but people still won there due to the defender limit being like six or something like that, (FC and RAT curbstomped multiple times)
A-team, aww don't try to play us, A-team. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2016 08:08 PM |
roses are red tires are black
when will lordmiltonious's father come back
/ +10,000 posts / FrigidWolf - Wolverized - xPrecision / Iron Insurgency / |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 07 Mar 2016 08:11 PM |
god damn cocksmith I said exclude varcia.
and smo ii was easy but only if you knew what you were doing.
vak could easily camp 2nd floor and that would be it |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2016 08:12 PM |
nothing much
you still active in clans?
i remember we had a load of beef back in the day lmao |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2016 08:12 PM |
vak could easily camp 2nd floor and that would be it------ they've lost outnumbering raiders there before, it was just an easy way to expose the lack of skill they had in general, especially by that generation of V O I D smh
A-team, aww don't try to play us, A-team. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Kazarn
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 863 |
|
|
| 07 Mar 2016 08:14 PM |
Honestly, I can understand why people find the even numbers thing silly at SMO.
I've always thought a server size of twenty-five, with a limit of fifteen raiders (10 v 15) would be some what reasonable.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Mar 2016 12:54 PM |
| Im active just showing the post |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Mar 2016 01:02 PM |
''if smo was really all about skill vak wouldn't be complaining about OO's base rn.''
We don't complain about OO's base, our past 6 raids there have been victories...
As for the OP, I'm not bothered responding to SMO threads anymore...
Raiders are just simply not skilled enough to raid SMO, while it isn't entirely balanced, compared to other forts at the present it is pretty easy.
VAK have won lot's of PR's at the current SMO, so if we can, you guys have no excuse.
And don't pull the ''Omg but it is ur base u guis are obviously bettur at it1111''
That basically translates to ''Wow you guys are better than us, make it easier for us to win''
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bladeor
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1924 |
|
|
| 08 Mar 2016 01:09 PM |
| Alas, VAK comes to save the day again! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
c0des
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Oct 2013 |
| Total Posts: 12351 |
|
| |
|
|
| 08 Mar 2016 01:26 PM |
| why do people think rhodes is unfair smh |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Mar 2016 01:37 PM |
In an attempt to make a base 100% fair, people neglect to realize it cannot be made fair based on objective standpoint for raiders, and the fact the Defending team will always have home field advantage and know the terrain better.
In the end, just forget making fair bases.
TheDarkVaraug, Evan || Add 23,771 Posts
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Mar 2016 01:41 PM |
I have no idea forged, it's pretty easy
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bladeor
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1924 |
|
| |
|
|
| 08 Mar 2016 01:47 PM |
| sadly FEAR thinks otherwise damien |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
usher121
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 431 |
|
|
| 08 Mar 2016 01:48 PM |
VAK will never change their OP fort. Most clans won't until they're forced with a system of complete balance.
VAK has an instant reset timer with 30 minutes to hold -- WTF? Really? 30 minutes, insta reset? No gtfo.
Not to mention that they spawn directly near the wall so they have easy access to get the terminal back.
14 v 14 -- Seriously, the raiding team is always suppose to have more numbers while raiding it's not suppose to be a fair balance. Why not? Well.... 30 min timer, reset terminal back to 0 if you capture it... Of course we need to outnumber you.
Medi guns... -- Need I say more?
VAK is so dead to me, they're a terrible clan with no purpose anymore. They will never consider fixing their fort cause they're butthurt young adults who will do anything not to lose even if that means building the fort to where there's no chance of winning.
And that's in general with most clans #GetfkingReal |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zullway
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Oct 2013 |
| Total Posts: 15074 |
|
|
| 08 Mar 2016 01:49 PM |
| Usher couldn't have said it better tbh |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Mar 2016 01:50 PM |
"i'd rather just raid kaznan"
I think that'll be worse than the current SMO, but your opinion, friend.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Mar 2016 01:50 PM |
The term is a 20 second re-cap
The spawns are even
But what would I expect from a FEAR member
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|