WannaBet
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 23607 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 03:40 PM |
| if you're going to take extreme scummy measures to try to save yourselves from losing you are only going to fuel the problem this community has with fighting wars |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WannaBet
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 23607 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 03:47 PM |
| & for whichever war void plans to pursue, i advise it to ban the use of the forums altogether. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 03:52 PM |
| I use the forums regularly just because I like to. I'm not going to stop using it to please you |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WannaBet
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 23607 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 03:54 PM |
| it's not to please me, it's to save yourself from ruining your war and ending in the kind of mess raa is in right now. i'm talking about banning its use for your wars, not in general. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 03:55 PM |
Umm that won't ruin the war.
You guys not playing like you're supposed to ruins wars and I always play by the rules that were agreed to.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Toosalty
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1515 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 03:57 PM |
| iso immediately attacks this thread |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WannaBet
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 23607 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 03:58 PM |
| efforts to smear the enemy and manipulate public consensus is always the result of highly publicized wars and it will impede on your war whether or not you are responsible of it |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 03:59 PM |
| How am I attacking anyone? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
5ancu
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2015 |
| Total Posts: 6771 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:02 PM |
toosalty wannabet got iso involved in the thread by mentioning void
if anything, wannebet attacked iso |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WannaBet
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 23607 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:04 PM |
| RAA has done to every opponent it ever had and we were going to be victimized by it. VOID's wars often end up as forum drama too. If you enjoy battling on the forums more so than in-game then disregard my advice, but it shows how you prefer your wars to be fought. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
SLPM
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 33349 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:04 PM |
Your fort sucks I surrender.
*next day*
Adding you to my too scared to fight list.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WannaBet
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 23607 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:05 PM |
| I didn't attack him, Sancu. I gave a genuine suggestion since I know VOID wants to fight a war soon. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WannaBet
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 23607 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:05 PM |
has done it and we were not*
tablet autocorrect is infuriating |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
5ancu
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2015 |
| Total Posts: 6771 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:06 PM |
| it's a pretty horrible suggestion, considering every clan that can be considered decent (besides VAK and very few others) live off C&G. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WannaBet
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 23607 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:09 PM |
| Totally not true about most clans being C&G groups, true for VOID although ISO will completely disagree with you, but furthermore my suggestion is specific to war-times only. I know he needs hype to build up but the second the war starts and the marketing campaign ends he may as well (and whoever he will be fighting) keep the war in-game and on Skype rather than on the forums. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
5ancu
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2015 |
| Total Posts: 6771 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:10 PM |
| Name me some clans that are relevant and considered decent as of right now you believe are not C&G clans. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ghost0ps
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 14516 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:14 PM |
if you take the trash talk to a personal level, you're letting the "trash talkers win"
if you just ignore it, it wont be fun anymore lmao
you guys bring this upon yourself |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WannaBet
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 23607 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:15 PM |
War clans only?
UAF, FEAR, RAT, WIJ, OO, NFC and like half a dozen sword clans.
TCC is big on the forums right now but it doesn't depend on it, same goes for FoA. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
5ancu
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2015 |
| Total Posts: 6771 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:19 PM |
TCC was brought to life through the forums, and FoA seems to fight most of its wars on the forums, or at least express their sudden dominance on the forums at the very least.
NFC isn't a "C&G" clan, but neither is it decent.
I don't even know what OO is, but I've seen it mentioned so much on C&G.
I'll let you have UAF.
In general you can count most super clans out of being reliant on C&G, but most super clans haven't done anything relevant to wars, or just clans in general for months, perhaps even years (FEAR, RAT, WIJ, NFC, none of them have done anything for half a year+). |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WannaBet
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 23607 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:23 PM |
TCC was not brought to life through the forums and has been a very active group prior to the war. Its current priority, above any war related issues, is to integrate the newcomers they've brought into the clan through their multi-million advertising campaign. TCC gained several thousands of members in the past week, do you really believe that much of it has to do with the forums?
NFC is fully operational and gets an okay amount of people to events, I think that constitutes them being a decent clan, especially when they're much more stable and active than a clan you would likely consider decent like RAA.
OO does not depend on the forums what-so-ever, it's a relatively stable superclan.
If you're going to let me have UAF, you may as well let me have all of the other clans mentioned because they're on par or above for activity. UAF is actually one of the least active, fully operational war clans in the moment. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WannaBet
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 23607 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:28 PM |
| FEAR has actually had enormous success in its recent recruitment campaign bringing in tens of thousands of new members and earning hundreds of thousands up to a million R$ for future clan-related expenditure projects. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
5ancu
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2015 |
| Total Posts: 6771 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:32 PM |
"TCC was not brought to life through the forums and has been a very active group prior to the war. Its current priority, above any war related issues, is to integrate the newcomers they've brought into the clan through their multi-million advertising campaign. TCC gained several thousands of members in the past week, do you really believe that much of it has to do with the forums?"
I'm saying that they were brought to life in the first place through the forums. All of the advertisements that came afterwards doesn't influence any of that.
"NFC is fully operational and gets an okay amount of people to events, I think that constitutes them being a decent clan, especially when they're much more stable and active than a clan you would likely consider decent like RAA."
Now you're claiming I think RAA is decent, but okay. You see everything in black/white, I think that's your problem. And if NFC is "fully operational", why don't they do anything clan/war related that would support such a claim?
"OO does not depend on the forums what-so-ever, it's a relatively stable superclan."
"Relatively" being the key word in that sentence.
"If you're going to let me have UAF, you may as well let me have all of the other clans mentioned because they're on par or above for activity. UAF is actually one of the least active, fully operational war clans in the moment."
UAF has never been the most active clan, and its activity swings a lot. Recently, all of the Generals (Lucara, KingWilling, latino4eva5) basically quit ROBLOX, so they've had to pick the best aspiring prospects to take up the task. But it sure as hell kicks butt here and there, and has beaten several of the clans you mentioned on the list prior to its Generals leaving, now that you wish to speak so much of the past, even though I clearly indicated I was talking about right here, right now, by saying 'current'. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
5ancu
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2015 |
| Total Posts: 6771 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:33 PM |
"FEAR has actually had enormous success in its recent recruitment campaign bringing in tens of thousands of new members and earning hundreds of thousands up to a million R$ for future clan-related expenditure projects."
FEAR never does anything war related, and when they do, they get absolutely battered, irregardless of how many R$ SONIC has. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WannaBet
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 23607 |
|
|
| 18 Feb 2016 04:49 PM |
TCC wasn't brought to life by the forums, it became dependent on the forums throughout 2014 and since then reformed its structure to become independent of it. What they were throughout a period of time has nothing to do with what the group is now, after all, as you put it at the end of your response, we're talking about "current clans". It is above decent and independent of the forums.
Clans that are fully operational don't have to partake in wars - and NFC has on numerous occasions throughout the past year such as the REDFOR vs. BLUFOR war. Just because the scope of your knowledge is limited to what you see here does not mean that that's all there is, the same point goes for OO which is a fully operational superclan (that is more active than UAF by a good amount) that happens to be independent of the forums.
FEAR has not only been fully operational for more than half a decade but it's currently the most active superclan. Its front page campaign was a huge success and is worth more than any meager war victory in this game. I think your view on clan has been too distorted by the ignorance of the C&G community. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|