|
| 25 Jan 2016 12:44 PM |
A lot of teams shut down the doubters in Week 1. As we move on to Week 2 lets see who rose and who fell. We still have a long way to go!
#1 Corinth Spartans(1-0){Last Week-- #5} =================== The adrenaline running from the Rams game is probably still flowing. Spartans, have been underrated during the duration of the offseason, but I think now people are starting to see the Offensive powerhouse they are. Expect more results out of them all season.
#2 Milikan Rams(0-1){Last Week-- #1} ================ No one should be saying the Rams aren't a VB team anymore because that's just blasphemy at it's finest. The Rams have a very talented roster so imagine what they could do with practice? Chemistry is the Ram's biggest obstacle.
#3 Korblox Snowhawks(1-0){Last Week-- #9} ===================== Coming into the season, I made it clear this team depended on Healable's activity. Props to healable because he seems very committed to proving the doubters wrong week after week. Snowhawks have a relatively small roster (30 members) so I still see activity as a concern, but the chemistry, team play, and the fact every member on Korblox wants to succeed, will go a long way this season.
#4 Dansville Ducks(1-0){Last Week-- 4} ================== Dansville stay the exact same spot I had them coming into the season because they confirmed my doubt. Still very deadly on paper, but no matter how many excuses this team comes up with, activity seems like a huge problem for them.
#5 Highland Huskies(0-1){Last Week-- 3} =================== Losing to Korblox should not change people's minds that the Huskies are a fluke. They still have one of the best WR core with a nice QB. =================== #6 Barton Bruisers(1-0) {Last Week-- 10} ----------------------- My question for death coming into the season was can he step up? I think he did a pretty good job answering that against the tough Warriors defense. ---------------------- #7 Roblox Warriors(0-1){Last Week-- 2} ---------------------- Like the Rams its hard to ignore the skill on paper. The recent loss of vrillion could definitely deter them, but I think they will recoup and get back to winning form ----------------------- #8 RedCliff Raiders(1-0){Last Week-- 12} ----------------------- Big win vs Canton, Raiders move up because Mm has showed that his team is top 10. Keeping one of the solid offenses down to 23 points is impressive, while scoring 24 points. (kudos to Hanboy13) ----------------------- #9 Canton Greats(0-1){Last Week-- 7} ------------------------ This team doesn't deserved to be moved down, and I know they can do better. They could have gone for the tie, but who actually goes for ties? ------------------------ #10 Pemberley Punishers(1-0){Last Week-- 8} ---------------------- Win is a win, but the Punishers played a team with a guy who got HC a few days ago. Lets come back in Week 2 when they have to play the Highland Huskies, before we really get a discussion about this team. ----------------------- #11 Florida Firecats (1-0) {Last Week-- 6} ----------------------- I was tempted to move the Firecats up, but the fact is I really need to see more. Mallard claims he's bringing in Collinator and that's a fantastic move, but still need to see more. ----------------------- #12 Saxon Sunbirds (0-1) {Last Week-- 13} -------------------------- Poor Dc man, you'll get it next time. DC and Benny are going to be a threat that we talk about in the next weeks. All though they are 12 in these power rankings, let's open our eyes because Saxon is gonna do something special this season. -------------------------- #13 Joston Jackrabbits (0-1){Last Week-- 14} #14 Rockford Raptors(1-0) {Last Week-- 15} #15 RektShire Rattlers(0-1){Last Week-- 11} #16 Roblox Panthers(0-1){Last Week-- 16} ========================================= Thanks for reading, again I want all the criticsm I can get. I feel as if i'm getting better every week and I hope you guys can say the same. A lot of teams don't deserve to be where they are (Saxon), but unfortunately the skill level on other teams has risen, and it leaves me asking questions. --------- PREVIOUS POWER RANKINGS
http://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=182182564 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jan 2016 12:48 PM |
rockford beat joston and they're still below them? seems legit.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jan 2016 12:51 PM |
If you saw the ending of the game had Joston played it correctly they'd be winners.
I also don't like how ikios is doing things, very arrogant coach compared to silly |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
CP3HD
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 387 |
|
|
| 25 Jan 2016 12:59 PM |
FFC wins, goes down 5 ranks. Pemberley wins, goes down 2 ranks. Rockford beats Joston, still below them.
Millikan loses to the #5 ranked team, goes down less than teams who won their games.
Bro, if people call my predictions trash, this has to the damn landfill. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jan 2016 01:03 PM |
Power rankings aren't about wins and losses lol
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jan 2016 01:22 PM |
| Well you are comparing an Assistant Coach to a Head Coach. And us sacking them and forcing them to throw an inc on 4th and 40 is not luck, but to each their own I like being underrated. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jan 2016 02:32 PM |
I really think ikios is your downfall.
However I do like how your coaching your team this season. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jan 2016 02:50 PM |
"Power rankings aren't about wins and losses lol"
Exactly and after week 1 there shouldn't be huge fluctuations unless a huge blowout happened unexpectedly. Good power rankings and keep the coming!
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jan 2016 02:51 PM |
| uhh power rankings are pretty much wins and losses. hotter teams get ranked higher lol. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
hancock3
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 4708 |
|
| |
|
MaIlard
|
  |
| Joined: 29 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 7661 |
|
|
| 25 Jan 2016 03:13 PM |
we were #5 and go to #12 for beating rattlers
like it's not my fault I played the rattlers, I beat who I had in front of me and went on idk how that penalizes us |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
lannypooo
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Nov 2015 |
| Total Posts: 317 |
|
|
| 25 Jan 2016 03:54 PM |
| i wouldn't give us #1 rank for beating rams but good rankings otherwise |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jan 2016 04:01 PM |
Listen, I didn't rank you guys low because of playing the rattlers. I ranked you guys 11 because of your performance playing the rattlers.
23-14 to a team that lost 2 of there deeps? You only threw short intermediate throws, however your run game is very strong. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jan 2016 04:02 PM |
uhh power rankings are pretty much wins and losses. hotter teams get ranked higher lol.
not gonna rank a team higher just because they won. Would you rank the patriots higher than the Panthers for beating the Jags? Or would you rank the panthers higher for losing to the Cardinals by a field goal.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jan 2016 04:08 PM |
| Who the hell cares about power rankings after week 1.....teams are still trying to find their identity, well most |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Rodriquex
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Jun 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14525 |
|
| |
|
|
| 25 Jan 2016 04:17 PM |
| only thing harder than power rankings before the season is power rankings after week 1 imo |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dmayer65
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Jun 2009 |
| Total Posts: 481 |
|
|
| 25 Jan 2016 04:20 PM |
i like these rankings, nice job
I am the one who knocks. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 29 Jan 2016 11:13 AM |
Rockford at 14 AND below Joston? Pemberley 10? Rams still top 3? Canton "didn't deserve to lose?"
roflmao.
"What's a god to a nonbeliever?" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Jan 2016 11:19 AM |
Rockford at 14 AND below Joston? Pemberley 10? Rams still top 3? Canton "didn't deserve to lose?"
Rockford at 14 was a mistake and I Acknowledge that
Pemberley hasn't shown anything to move up from 10
Rams still are a top 3 team and its not close
Canton could of obviously gone for the tie so no they didn't deserve to lose |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Jan 2016 12:21 PM |
even with a tie they'd be the same or even lower.
rams didnt play like top 3 by far snowhawks, spartans, even bruisers if u stretch it
pemberley had 4 turnovers so i mean they at least should be #8, best of the mediocre
"What's a god to a nonbeliever?" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Jan 2016 12:22 PM |
plus warriors are rebuilding they are way too high rn
"What's a god to a nonbeliever?" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|