|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:33 AM |
| Wait, I'm still a bit confused... What happened to this war? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
seliso
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6443 |
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:34 AM |
| paul joined XI and basically controlled XI with his gang. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:35 AM |
| So it ended as a stalemate, as XI was being helped by another group? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
seliso
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6443 |
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:40 AM |
| XI became SF. but yes a stalemate you can say. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
seliso
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6443 |
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:43 AM |
| http://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=181816227 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
RECL4IMER
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Apr 2015 |
| Total Posts: 594 |
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:46 AM |
I will make a forum clearing everything up later. SF did not carry XI, basically I asked Paul to join as he himself is a skilled combatant and fighter. All of the first days raid wins were achieved by all XI members.
Yesterday I was not online and so my HR's ran the war but FOA broke the war terms and claimed wins obtained before the raid times as actually war wins. In retaliation Paul smashed FOA with SF members.
I will go more in depth, I am only writing this today as I was away all of yesterday and am receiving stick for something that happened when I was not even present.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:46 AM |
| Makes sense for it to end as a stalemate since SF helped out XI. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:47 AM |
| @Rec4 Then why is XI claiming the victory? Both teams broke terms, should end as a stalemate... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:48 AM |
| Just because FoA broke the terms doesn't mean you guys also have to do the same. Both groups are at fault, so this should wuite clearly end as a tie. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
RECL4IMER
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Apr 2015 |
| Total Posts: 594 |
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:50 AM |
We broke war terms after them. When I realized what had happened when I got online I spoke to Dystra and was attempting to nullify all raid wins achieved yesterday which would of made the war score 2-1.
I gave Dystra everything he wanted and I mean everything. He edited his base without our permission and refused all suggestions made by us.
I just wanted a fun war not all this. And I am claiming a win as we were winning, and he pulled out without sorting out the issues. That is a surrender in any book.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
RECL4IMER
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Apr 2015 |
| Total Posts: 594 |
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:51 AM |
But just wait I will explain what actually happened later on in a forum with a ton of evidence, and then we will see everyone's opinion on the matter. FOA backed out, XI was eager to continue once we map everything out.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:53 AM |
| So what you are saying is that, if I was FoA, and I jumped off the building, you would jump off right after me? You should handle this diplomaticly, instead of breaking the wars terms. Talk it out with FoA, and if it does not work out and they are neglecting it, declare superiority. That would make a lot more sense, but just breaking war terms, because they did as well is not good. Both teams did wrong, and the war ends as a stalemate from a neutral point of view(I am not in FoA). |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:54 AM |
You wanted to change a base designed for KOs to a terminal base - it wasn't happening because it's an awful idea.
You agreed to the spawn changes, also. That made the base significantly more fair.
You're the one who had these absolutely ridiculous restraints on the war such as raid times. You refused to negotiate with me, you lied to me, and you fought the war like an absolute coward.
You can go ahead and claim your petty victory in the same manner you did over TCC, I believe everyone has seen our true strength trumps your strength.
It must genuinely feel rough having to have another group hold your hand through a war. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:55 AM |
| Your evidence or whatever claims you have are useless, as you just agreed that you broke a war term. Both teams broke war terms, it is as simple as that, and both groups were at fault. In this case, this would end as a stalematea. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
RECL4IMER
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Apr 2015 |
| Total Posts: 594 |
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:56 AM |
Dysta we broke 0 war terms. And if you haven't noticed I gave in and kept the base a KO base as it was going to remain for the remainder of the war you pulled out of.
You're the most unreasonable child I have ever met. Good luck justifying the forum I write up later.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 09:57 AM |
I am not tooting my own horn here, but we didn't break war terms. We defended our base throughout the whole war, whereas they refused to defend for an entire day. I have LEGITIMATE PROOF of everything you agreed to, we have proof that your member count steadily rose when your men were rallied ( having SF members join ) and I have proof you ordered your men not to defend.
Tell me - where is Paul now that the war has ended? He is gone, you had him join simply for war. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
RECL4IMER
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Apr 2015 |
| Total Posts: 594 |
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 10:00 AM |
And actually Aguaro the only war term we broke was claiming victories outside of allowed raid times which is exactly what they were doing.
And if you didn't read my reply I said I was going to nullify all of the raid wins achieved by both clans on that day.
FOA changed their base without our permission and began claiming wins outside of raid times that were in the terms. And Dystra I am going to stop arguing with you over the forums and you will just have to wait for me to post all our evidence. The fact is you left the war, I didn't want to claim an auto win I wanted to keep fighting and achieve 20 raid wins.
And this triumphant mite was not displayed in the slightest since you were losing on the first day and even on the second. Around 3 SF were present in the events on Friday which we were winning. Good game. (y)
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 10:00 AM |
^ You basically hired mercenaries. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
RECL4IMER
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Apr 2015 |
| Total Posts: 594 |
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 10:01 AM |
I at no point ordered my men not to defend.
I was not present at all on Sunday but seeing as you were claiming wins before the allowed raid times I give credit to my HR's putting a halt on the war so we could talk.
For you to only pull out as I was giving you exactly what you wanted.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 10:01 AM |
| Stop acting as if a 2-1 lead is anything special. Prior to your complete refusal to defend ( again, I have proof. Don't lie to everyone. ) we were winning every raid. We would have been in the lead before you just stopped allowing us to raid altogether. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 10:03 AM |
Your third in command ordered your men not to defend. Again - I HAVE PROOF.
He also kicked me when I showed up and tried to reason with him and called me an idiot.
Shows what kind of officers you've got running XI. You're a backwater leader fit for a backwater clan. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
RECL4IMER
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Apr 2015 |
| Total Posts: 594 |
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 10:03 AM |
Winning every raid? Aha you raided so much more than us.
And yes a 2-1 lead is nothing, still more than you had though.
And I like how I am achieving full blame for how my HR's handled yesterday when I was not online. Although they did it the correct way.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 10:03 AM |
why do wars need literally terms and agreements, just beat each other until one of you stops fighting ok.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 10:06 AM |
You are to blame, because those are your officers. The men you entrust to lead the group in your absence.
And just FYI both raids we hosted on you yesterday were a victory.
As for Doom's ( long time, no see ) comment, I generally don't mind war terms and they CAN prevent some acts of cowardice, but groups like XI manipulate them to their advantage. Defending your base should be common sense, a requirement, but they defended single servers at a time stating it wasn't in the war terms. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Jan 2016 10:08 AM |
| Dystra is speaking the sincere truth. With the evidence he has, and also the fact that you agreed that you told Paul to help you out, you have no right to claim victory like this. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|