|
| 08 Jan 2016 09:58 AM |
(The title was just to draw you in, it was a little bit misleading)
I've had an idea for a new BC that I thought I'd throw out there: Professional Builder's Club (PBC).
It is aimed at developers only, so it would cost more, maybe $39.99 a month, but instead of earning 1Tx per visit, they earn 1R$, so although it costs more, the idea is, they can then earn more through DevEx.
In addition, PBC members can have unlimited places active and earn 100R$ daily.
I was also thinking that since it is only for developers, you must first make a game with over 1M visits and prove your scripting and coding skills before you can purchase Professional Builder's Club.
Notes: I am aware that Shedletsky said there will be no more BCs, also that OBC alone is expensive, the point is that it is for a select few people who want developing on ROBLOX to be their job. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
helloburp
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14376 |
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 10:00 AM |
Actually, this doesn't sound too bad. Was expecting some really crappy "Mini Builders Club" garbage but this could actually be pretty useful.
Even if it is WNTS, support. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 10:06 AM |
| ^ Constructive criticism 1-0-1. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 10:20 AM |
no support you used a click-bait title
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oqqPCPFdRE
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Alton3144
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Jan 2009 |
| Total Posts: 2911 |
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 10:44 AM |
I know you have the right idea to help developers, however, I don't like this idea. For one, I do not believe 1M place visits is a really valid way to prove yourself, mainly for false thumbnails. Also I believe 1M is way to high, I believe it should be more like 100,000 to 500,000.
Another problem is, if it's a membership that you have to pay for, why should you need to have a requirement to buy something? It should be granted to a very good builder, and if that was the case I would be all for the 1M requirement.
Next is the issue of alts when it comes to the the 1 robux per visit could be easily alt abusable. If you can find ways around those issues then I'd support, even if it is WNTS.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 12:52 PM |
WTNS so No Support
[Insert siggy here] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 12:55 PM |
| WNTS Is still relevant. It is in a Pinned Thread. Look at it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 01:37 PM |
| Barely anyone uses their 100 places also WNTS and misleading title no support |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
MarbloxVx
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Oct 2015 |
| Total Posts: 2646 |
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 02:12 PM |
Why should they add this and support
http://www.roblox.com/BAIT-item?id=279048481 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
MarbloxVx
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Oct 2015 |
| Total Posts: 2646 |
|
| |
|
Graidlyz
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 13357 |
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 02:16 PM |
WNTS
Btw 1r$ per visit is waaay too much, loleris would have like R$80,000,000 /200,000 USD
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
xlaser23
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 20341 |
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 03:03 PM |
" It is aimed at developers only"
" It is aimed at developers only"
" It is aimed at developers only"
" It is aimed at developers only"
GET OUTTTTTTTT
http://www.roblox.com/xla-item?id=290739801http://www.roblox.com/aser-item?id=290739819http://www.roblox.com/23-item?id=290739831 R$1,226 Tx248 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 03:05 PM |
this sounded like a good idea
untill you said "devs only" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 03:06 PM |
WNTS and overall is just unneeded.
~siggy~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
xender2
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1970 |
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 03:55 PM |
A "professional" wouldn't need a higher stipend because they would be making money....
Don't need a new BC, but having more then 100 places somehow would be good. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 04:00 PM |
If you throw the whole thing about this being WNTS [which it is, so there's no trying to get this suggestion approved] out the window, you then realize there's plenty of reasons this is not a good idea.
Unlimited places? Way too far. A higher number? Reasonable. More daily stipend? Reasonable. ROBUX instead of Tickets for places? No. There really isn't a way to "prove your scripting and coding skills" that can be analyzed and determined by code. DevEx is already hurting ROBLOX to some extent, so making it easier to DevEx is not helpful. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 04:21 PM |
A developer aimed builder's club is an interesting concept, but this violates the WNTS and nothing extremely special here designated for developers.
Sorry
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 04:23 PM |
I wonder how many times I got reported for this post...
...still no '[ Content Deleted ]' though so haha you petty reporters. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Vendetex
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Aug 2013 |
| Total Posts: 124 |
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 05:11 PM |
| That would make everybody too rich if they have a popular game. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 05:19 PM |
> I wonder how many times I got reported for this post...
Why would anyone report...? This isn't breaking the rules. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jan 2016 05:54 PM |
| " few people who want developing on ROBLOX to be their job." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Jan 2016 01:00 PM |
If you think that 1R$ per visit is too much, then simple: raise the monthly cost, but if you consider that people like loleris have been developed for over half a decade, then actually US$200,000 is a reasonable earning.
Also bump. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
andreja6
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 1198 |
|
|
| 12 Jan 2016 01:07 PM |
| No, DevEx is already an over-bloated scheme, that actually encourages hacking and place theft. People should build because they want to build, not for money. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|