|
| 05 Jan 2016 06:14 PM |
| http://pastebin.com/zHN6P7CA |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| 05 Jan 2016 06:15 PM |
like i've already said I AM COMPLETELY NEUTRAL ON THIS GAME i see a lot of negative reviews on this game a lot of them are saying that 'earthbound is way better' and stuff like that undertale was made by two people who had 51,124 dollars to work with and was made over the course of two years now look at earthbound earthbound was made by a whole side of a massive company with nearly zero budget restrictions do you see the difference? and as for people saying undertale is 'overrated' and that some other major game deserves just as good reviews from the major critics company games are rated DIFFERENTLY because the critics know the massive budgets that were put into the game. they use the amount of time & money put into it to effectively rate it. if a company made a game in 30 days with 5,000 dollars to work with, they would rate it based on what kind of funding and time it had indie games are reviewed quite the same, but they have LOWER STANDARDS. a team of two people with 51 thousand dollars is expected not to have major industry quality. a game like fallout 4, however, is expected to be a top notch 100% perfect game based on its time spent as well as the massive crew that is supposed to be working on it. 300 people with a 50,000,000 budget; did they spend their time and money correctly? if not, low review indie games aren't given a scale this big. most are expected to have 5,000 to 100,000 dollar budgets and a production period of one year. undertale had a higher than normal budget and a two year production course. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|