|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:13 PM |
This is an actual U.S. bill being suggested.
Beginning on the date that is 90 days after the date of enactment of the Assault Weapons Ban of 2015, it shall be unlawful for any person who is not licensed under this chapter to transfer a grandfathered semiautomatic assault weapon to any other person who is not licensed under this chapter, unless a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer has first taken custody of the grandfathered semiautomatic assault weapon for the purpose of complying with subsection (s). Upon taking custody of the grandfathered semiautomatic assault weapon, the licensee shall comply with all requirements of this chapter as if the licensee were transferring the grandfathered semiautomatic assault weapon from the licensee’s inventory to the unlicensed transferee, except that in applying paragraph (1)(B)(ii) of such subsection, ‘14’ shall be substituted for ‘3
Basically this is saying that if this bill is passed then it would be illegal to give anyone a firearm who does not have a federal gun license. And any gun manufacturer can be apprehended for doing so. If you want to know how hard it is to get a federal gun license, go ask the dead corpses outside of the courthouse licensing office lol. This would apply to any weapon that is semi-automatic (Any gun that is re-chambered using the force of the previous fired round), and has a pistol grip, and or a rifle barrel.
So basically any gun that isn't an old western style repeater, or 10% of todays shotguns. Welcome to 'freedom' America.
-"Here I am spreading the glorious word of vaktus." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:14 PM |
I was never a fan of Obama to begin with. His goal is to have the U.S. under martial law so he can stay in office. That's why he hasn't spoken about the race wars or anything.
I'd be surprised if we were here another 10 years. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:17 PM |
I think he'll leave come 2016, but Hillary would probably be next. We all know that would be 20x worse. Not only a known Anti-firearm supporter, but a known liar.
-"Here I am spreading the glorious word of vaktus." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:17 PM |
| ...and the trick is that the government is simply trying to disarm you. Your second amendment right is to protect you from enemies both foreign and domestic--including a corrupt government. A lot of people don't see what is happening. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:18 PM |
But why exactly would anyone actually need to own any assault weapon?
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:19 PM |
"But why exactly would anyone actually need to own any assault weapon?"
To protect yourself from your own government, who just so happen to own assault weapons as well. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:22 PM |
True that.
-"Here I am spreading the glorious word of vaktus." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:22 PM |
Finally someone with some logic in their brain
I hate it when people pull the "for protection" or "for home invasions" card, because that's absolutely stupid. One pump of a shotgun (Even an empty one with a trigger lock) and the home invader will scuttle out of your house like a rat.
Big guns aren't necessary for "self defense" but they are necessary in the event that the government becomes to oppressive. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:26 PM |
| The 'for protection' card still applies to defending yourself from your own government. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:29 PM |
| If the evil, corrupt government was going to come kill us all, I feel like they would instead utilize a jet bomber instead of ground forces. Any firearm would really have no effect on that. Perhaps we should legalize anti-aircraft weaponry for civilian usage. Or nuclear weaponry. That will show them. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:31 PM |
"If the evil, corrupt government was going to come kill us all, I feel like they would instead utilize a jet bomber instead of ground forces."
I don't believe the goal of a corrupt government is to flatten their land, but rather ensure their people obey the dictatorship they are trying to force on people.
Bombing would cause too much damage. That's a little out there anyways, and you sound really ignorant to even bring up that claim. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:34 PM |
I just read this an realized the guy who posted this must be white and live in the south. There is no need for an assault weapon. Are we in war? No. Are we going into war? No. There's no point of having them unless you plan to use them anytime soon
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:35 PM |
| just wanted to point out that the GOP controls all the houses so blaming obama is irrelevant because his party wasn't the one to pass the law |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:36 PM |
| And in order to keep this country save some of our rights have to be removed. It's like school really. You have freedom of speech but you can't curse and stuff. Some places have rules that have to be followed. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:37 PM |
xKingSloth -
You are probably a kid who was raised by liberal parents. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:38 PM |
I don't know if that's really "out there" considering the hypothetical topic of discussion. Airstrikes are a safe way for some super evil government to take out opposition, or at least assassins; you know, where there isn't much hope of self-protection at all.
Of course, maybe I'm being pessimistic... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:38 PM |
| I was raised by people who know what's good and what's not. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:39 PM |
"But why exactly would anyone actually need to own any assault weapon?"
Ah. Typical kind of responses.
If we're going to use that logic, why does anyone need to own more than 2 cars? Why does anyone need to own more than 1 house?
It's because you have the right to. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:39 PM |
"Airstrikes are a safe way for some super evil government to take out opposition, or at least assassins; you know, where there isn't much hope of self-protection at all."
I believe he was talking about them bombing the entire United States (considering they would pretty much have to in order to start a dictatorship). |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:40 PM |
"I was raised by people who know what's good and what's not."
I'm not going to take any replies from you seriously because you're either trolling or extremely stupid about this topic. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:40 PM |
I really don't understand why people need automatics in their homes or whatever. I think a pistol is just fine, maybe a shotgun (SOME) are pushing it.
We have a police force ( Yes its corrupt) but they are there to supposedly protect us. We shouldn't be armed with autos and such, come on >.>
and plus, with all this violence cmon. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:41 PM |
LOL THIS GUY THINKS BEING CONSERVATIVE IS BETTER
NEWSFLASH KID: IT ISN'T! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:41 PM |
"I really don't understand why people need automatics in their homes or whatever. I think a pistol is just fine, maybe a shotgun (SOME) are pushing it."
It's their right lol
it doesn't matter whether you need it or not
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:41 PM |
awesomelilwayne29 -
"'But why exactly would anyone actually need to own any assault weapon?'
To protect yourself from your own government, who just so happen to own assault weapons as well. " |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
iKeno
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Jan 2008 |
| Total Posts: 27490 |
|
|
| 29 Dec 2015 12:43 PM |
not like i can just use a pistol to shoot an invader
noooo i need a flipping semi automatic assault rifle to kill an invader
like when the flip am i going to be invaded by a whole terrorist squad. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|