A320NEO
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4755 |
|
|
| 08 Dec 2015 06:23 PM |
They are #14 at 9-3 but Nebraska was #24 at 9-3 a few years back Michigan shouldn't be ranked higher than Florida who has 10 wins while Michigan has 9 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 08 Dec 2015 06:54 PM |
| Florida was good until they lost their QB |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Dec 2015 07:09 PM |
"but Nebraska was #24 at 9-3 a few years back"
i think this is very very very very very irrelevant |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
BroBro264
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 28121 |
|
|
| 08 Dec 2015 07:39 PM |
| if you want to talk about real bias, look at #25 USC according to the CFP |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
A320NEO
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4755 |
|
|
| 09 Dec 2015 06:10 PM |
| well the committee is pretty much biased with most of the previously good teams |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 Dec 2015 06:55 PM |
| (IMO)the play vs Michigan State, that shouldnt and didnt hurt their ranking..Michigan only lost to Utah, MSU, and OSU...which are all great teams...Flordia lost to LSU and FSU...which arent the greatest of teams |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
A320NEO
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4755 |
|
|
| 10 Dec 2015 11:47 PM |
| Utah is an average team, not saying they're bad but they were way too over-hyped and they are 9-3 too unlike MSU and OSU and Michigan has just been performing not so well this season so they have no business at rank #14 maybe somewhere at #18-22 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
A320NEO
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4755 |
|
|
| 10 Dec 2015 11:57 PM |
How is Nebraska irrelevant if their powerhouse history is pretty similar to Michigan's and their identical record from last year had them ranked at #24 while Michigan is #14 this year at 9-3?
Don't bother saying "Michigan's players performed better this year than Nebraska did in 2014" because we saw the best performances from Ameer Abdullah, Randy Gregory and Kenny Bell |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|