|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:19 PM |
according to me calculationshs it is actully 5.1010983 studs tall
i measured it with a e minus to the power of 10- tan-1(1.0+5) i then halfed it to a 1/3 ratioafter factorising it to 2.1 . ∬▒R f(x,y)dA where f(x,y) = 3x + 5 and R = [1,6] ×[4,7] ∬▒R f(x,y)dA =510 . volume of the solid under z = √(1-x^2-y^2 ) and over the circular disk x^2+ y^2 ≤ 1 is:51.01. I then devided this while conceiving it to the next part of 3. . I thenCalculate the double integralto work out the robloxians width ∬▒R (8x+10y+80)dA where R (roblox) is the region : 0≤x≤5, 0≤y≤4 Answer3.1012 ∫_0^5 ∫_3^5 √(x+4y) dxdy Answer5.2003 ∬▒R y/(x+1) dA, R = [0,6]×[0,2] answer1.101 . ∬▒R e^(3x+4y) dA, R = [0,2]×[0,4] answer________
integral ∫∫Rxcos(2x+y)dA where R is the region: 0≤x≤π/3,0≤y≤π/2 answer4575.8765 . Evaluate the integral ∫_0^(π/6)▒∫_2^5(ycosx+1)dydx worked into an easily acquired. 5.101
So according to multiple statements i can officialy say, it is 5.101.
Here is a final equation to acuratly confirm the answer
√(4x + 5) - √(x + 4) = 2 (4x + 5) + (x + 4) - 2√(4x + 5)√(x + 4) = 4 5x + 9 - 4 = √(16x^2 + 84x + 80) 25(x + 1)^2 = 16x^2 + 84x + 80 25x^2 + 50x + 25 = 16x^2 + 84x + 80 9x^2 - 34x - 55 = 0 x = [34 ± √(1156 + 1980)] / 18 = (34 ± √3136) / 18 = (34 ± 56) / 18 = (17 ± 28) / 9 Solutions: x = -11/9 (extraneous) x = 5
THIS gave me an answer of 5. So with other factorisations
0.889 + 0.001 = 0.1 + 0.001 (previous equations) so 5.101
Thanks for reading
See these videos for more! maths
https://www.youtube.com/user/tristan1296 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Nemraz
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3879 |
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:20 PM |
"i measured it with a e minus"
your entire equation is illogical
*an |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:21 PM |
nemraz has just pulled off the greatest roast of this thread
every time i post on the forums my life expectancy decreases because why not |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
EuroCow
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 39918 |
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:22 PM |
| i feel like math is entirely wrong |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:23 PM |
@THE GUY WHO POSTED
An e minus is just a measuring tool i use (not litterely a sum)its litterel called The E Minus. Dissmissing it as oart of the rest of the sum and keeping it with Line one.
https://www.youtube.com/user/tristan1296 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
LouzyWoes
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Dec 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1417 |
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:24 PM |
@Dood you just killed my brain.. What are you doing?
This is worse then sniffing a sharpie |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Nemraz
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3879 |
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:24 PM |
no no no, i think you missed a few other things
"0.889 + 0.001 = 0.1 + 0.001"
seems legit |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:25 PM |
You can do semi-complex math (I didn't bother to check it), but cannot use proper grammar/spelling?
~MightyDantheman |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:26 PM |
@LouzyWoes
i think op also killed his own brain
there's a lot of wrong spellings like calculationshs???
every time i post on the forums my life expectancy decreases because why not |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:26 PM |
facepalm
i think nemraz is an idiot.
Read the whole equation before realing its connected, dumbass
https://www.youtube.com/user/tristan1296 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Nemraz
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3879 |
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:27 PM |
also,
"I then devided this while conceiving it to the next part of 3."
deviding is the semi-verb of dividing. it is extremely obscure but actually means multiplying. this thus brings a huge flaw to the entire equation and i think you need to reroad your entire thought. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:29 PM |
it is a spelling mistake. I am sorry.
https://www.youtube.com/user/tristan1296 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:30 PM |
...and possibly learn a little bit about grammar before posting here? The forums is supposed to only be for 13+. By 13 and above, you should be able to use proper grammar and punctuation (this also includes spelling).
~MightyDantheman |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:30 PM |
| uh you do realize you could easy have just multiplied 0.25 + 1 - 0.25 / 2 + 4 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:32 PM |
@Mighty Gtfo the internet is not a place to show off your grammar skills you scrub.
L2D MASTER |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:33 PM |
rub (someone or something) hard so as to clean them, typically with a brush and water
https://www.youtube.com/user/tristan1296 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Vexwood
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Oct 2013 |
| Total Posts: 2766 |
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:34 PM |
| Or ya'll could just to go studio and figure it out. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:34 PM |
At this point, I'm not even concerned about the math.
List of obvious grammar mistakes:
"according to me calculationshs it is actully 5.1010983 studs tall" According to my calculations, it is actually 5.1010983 studs tall."
"i measured it with a e minus to the power of 10- tan-1(1.0+5) i then halfed it to a 1/3 ratioafter factorising it to 2.1 . ∬▒R f(x,y)dA where f(x,y) = 3x + 5 and R = [1,6] ×[4,7] "
I measured it with an E minus, to the power of 10- tan-1(1.05+5). I then halved it to a 1/3 ration, after factorizing it to [...]
I'm just going to stop here...
~MightyDantheman |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
stickrage
|
  |
| Joined: 01 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 12231 |
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:37 PM |
| @mighy if he was under 13 he wouldn't be able to do this you dumb nut |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:38 PM |
@Bigbear336
>"Gtfo the internet is not a place to show off your grammar skills you scrub."
The reason why the internet isn't exactly a place for grammar is because of children who decide to ignore school. I would hope, because the forums is for ages 13 and above, that everyone here would be mature and at least use proper grammar. Of course, I've been on the internet (not just ROBLOX) long enough to realize that this is simply the reverse.
~MightyDantheman |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:41 PM |
@stickrage
>"if he was under 13 he wouldn't be able to do this you dumb nut"
Two things. First, ever heard of lying? He could've easily faked his age. Second, again, grammar:
>If he was under 13, he wouldn't be able to post this thread; you dumb nut.
~MightyDantheman |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Nov 2015 11:44 PM |
"-11/9"
That's not 5 boy
http://www.roblox.com/-----item?id=296825356 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Nov 2015 12:00 AM |
| a 6 year old looked at it and said "that is completely wrong" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Doumina
|
  |
| Joined: 24 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 2308 |
|
|
| 15 Nov 2015 12:04 AM |
| You just made this all up didn't you? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|