Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:43 AM |
..to shutdown the servers that got exploited.
You also made a rookie mistake by making it 5 AA for official in a 50 server size. You also made a rookie mistake by using a fort which timer is 750 with even spawns while RAT got to use a fort which they had several advantages in with a longer timer. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ShadowSTR
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 24465 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:43 AM |
"5 AA for official in a 50 server size"
....LMAO |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:44 AM |
| It should've been at least 15 AA. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
RotomWash
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 17727 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:44 AM |
" RAT got to use a fort which they had several advantages in with a longer timer."
don't forget that they asked for celeste |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:44 AM |
that's honestly sad if you do 5 AA for official server of 50..
i'd make it at least ten e.e |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zanziber
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 5088 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:45 AM |
its my first war, yeah i made mistakes
but nevertheless RAT asked me to use their terminal instead of our old one, and we would have wins if they had their base open GMT times and it worked. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:47 AM |
Rotom,
Him asking for Celeste wasn't a problem. Him using a fort with even spawns with a 750 timer was a problem. He should've moved his spawns a little closer like Celeste before the war started. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
RotomWash
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 17727 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:49 AM |
"Him asking for Celeste wasn't a problem."
him asking for an ancient base then not expecting problems with said base was the problem
instead of using our current base where none of this would have happened |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:51 AM |
| It was RAT's responsibility to check their terminal was working. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
RotomWash
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 17727 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:52 AM |
if i recall correctly it was the massive invade that broke it but I'm not a scripter so I have no idea
anyways I don't care enough to argue about this war, it was stupid from the get point and this was really the obvious thing to happen |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:53 AM |
"Him asking for Celeste wasn't a problem."
him asking for an ancient base then not expecting problems with said base was the problem
instead of using our current base where none of this would have happened [2]
moon man stronk |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:53 AM |
| That wouldn't cause a terminal to break. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:53 AM |
| Yeah you cannot blame RAT for raiding and accepting a win in an expolited server when it was your responsibility to shut the server down. You did not shut down the server, there was no fault in what RAT did there(carried on the raid). |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
RotomWash
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 17727 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:54 AM |
"That wouldn't cause a terminal to break. "
again, don't ask me man i have no idea. that's just what I heard |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:54 AM |
I agree with mohxy
AA did bad during negotiations |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zanziber
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 5088 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:54 AM |
| it wasnt an exploited server, we won the raid and left and forgot to shut it down or didnt see reason to as the giant message at the top saying "SERVER VOID AA HAS WON", we just thought youd leave not crop it out lol |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 10:56 AM |
They dont show full screen shots of the raid code. They cropp it out.
Spread it like peanut butter jelly. Do it like I owe you some moneh. Spread it like.... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Lecta
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 777 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 11:01 AM |
Aguaro, "⇒ [INV] Exploiting and cheating of any way, shape, or form is strictly prohibited. Any victories gained with the usage of these exploits will be invalidated."
from your very own war terms made by your very own leader....
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 11:06 AM |
| Also RAT server jumped like 10 times until they got 40v10 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mohxy
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5958 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 12:01 PM |
| Nothing wrong with server hopping. By making your fort 5 for official, you should've been ready to defend 5v45s. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Lecta
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 777 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 12:03 PM |
"[INV] There will be a maximum of 3 deployments in a row each day, and a cooldown of 30 minutes between each (you can win more than 3 times in a day if you create multiple servers, but you may only try 3 times)."
this is the rule hes refering to...
hi sir, im lecta!!! :> |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 12:03 PM |
| @Lecta Still Zanzi already said we have one valid win, therefore we are winning 1-0 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Lecta
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 777 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 12:08 PM |
We can't raid you at Celeste, so that's a warterm broken right there...
When we raided today you refuesed to defend 6 times, which again according to your own war terms gives us 6 wins?
⇒ [DV] Refusing to defend or not showing up in 10 minutes to a server that provides adequate room for the defenders will result in a win.
as this term has the [DV] tag, which means autowin to the raiders...
⇒ [DV]: Default Victory, should one faction violate a war term labeled with this tag, the opposing faction will gain one victory to their warscore
hi sir, im lecta!!! :> |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zanziber
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 5088 |
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 12:09 PM |
| your winning 1-0 yes, but you cant call a war win when your base has been closed or broken for the entire war and your high ranks refuse to defend. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Nov 2015 01:19 PM |
| You guys also had your base closed, and you guys called an end to the war, giving us the win since we were 1-0 up from what you believe, when we are really 5-0 up. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|